Brachytherapy, Radioisotope, Rectum Cancer, Recurrent
Conditions
Keywords
Three-Dimensional Printing, Rectum Cancer, Recurrent, Radioactive Iodine-125 seed implantation
Brief summary
This study observes the efficacy and side effects of 3D-printing non co-planar template(3D-PNCT) assisted with CT-guidance for radioactive Iodine-125 seed(RIS) brachytherapy in pelvic recurrent rectum carcinoma retrospectively, and analyzes the influence of clinical and dosimetric factors on the outcomes.
Detailed description
3D-PNCT assisted with CT-guidance for radioactive Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy is a conventional treatment in Peking University Third Hospital. Radioactive Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy is the implantation of Iodine-125 seed into tumors.The radioactive Iodine-125 seed can release low dose of irradiation persistently which kills tumors cell and causes less damage to normal tissue at the same time. 3D-printing non co-planar template is made individually which guides the implantation of Iodine-125 seed into the tumor and ensures the accuracy of the position.This study collects the data of patients with pelvic recurrent rectal carcinoma who underwent 3D-PNCT assisted with CT-guidance for radioactive Iodine-125 seed implantation from 2015 to 2018. We evaluate the dose that covers 90% target volume(D90),the volume that 100% prescription dose covers(V100) and other dosimetric parameters after the implantation. The efficacy and adverse effects were observed. Local control(LC) time and overall survival(OS) time are evaluated.
Interventions
3D-PNCT assisted with CT-guidance for radioactive Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy is a conventional treatment for patients with local recurrent rectal carcinoma. Retrospective data on the effectiveness and adverse effects of the past radioactive Iodine-125 seed implantation is collected.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* treated with 3D-printing non co-planar template assisted with CT-guidance for Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy in Peking University Third Hospital * histological proven recurrent rectal cancer * inoperable local recurrent cases * previous external beam radiotherapy, incapable of re-irradiation * expected life span\>3 months
Exclusion criteria
* serious medical illness * unable to tolerate anesthesia * blood coagulation dysfunction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival time | From date of implantation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last observation. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019. | The time from the date of implantation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last observation. Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. |
| Local control time | From date of implantation to the date of recurrence of the implanted tumor or the date of last observation. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019. | The time from the date of implantation to the date of recurrence of the implanted tumor or the date of last observation. Outcomes were followed up every 3 months after enrollment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain relief rate | 3 months after the implantation. The last follow-up point is February 2019. | Numerical rating scales(NRS) was used to evaluate the grade of pain. Grade 7-9 was defined as serve pain. Grade 4-6 was defined as moderate pain and grade 1-3 was defined as mild pain. The pain before and after the implantation was evaluated and the pain relief rate was measured. |
| Incidence of adverse events | From date of implantation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last observation. The last follow-up timepoint is February 2019. | The adverse events were evaluated by the toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The rate of each adverse event was measured. |