Skip to content

Serratus Anterior Plane Block , Paravertebral Block and Quality of Analgesia in Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma

Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Patients With Unilateral Multiple Rib Fractures: Comparative Randomized Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03890757
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-03-26
Start date
2019-05-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia

Brief summary

Pain associated with rib movement cause inability to cough and breathe deeply that leads to reduction in the tidal volume and predisposes to significant atelectasis, sputum retention, pneumonia and a reduction in functional residual capacity .These factors in turn lead to decreased lung compliance, ventilation perfusion mismatch, hypoxemia and respiratory distress. Therefore, effective pain relief remains the cornerstone of management to prevent serious respiratory complications .

Detailed description

Thoracic paravertebral block and other regional techniques like intrapleural block and intercostal nerve blocks have variable success and high potential for local anaesthetic toxicity. Serratus anterior plane block is relatively novel technique that is less invasive, easier to perform and improve pulmonary function that reduces the incidence of pneumonia, number of ventilator days, and mortality, especially those sustaining five or more rib fractures

Interventions

OTHERultrasound guided paravertebral or serratus anterior block

Patients groups will be as follow: Group (I): Serratus plane block will be performed with the patient in the lateral position and the arm abducted. Using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe ,Group (II): thoracic paravertebral block will be performed in the sitting position. The spinal level chosen for needle insertion will be two segments below the upper most fractured rib or midway between the upper most and lowest fractured rib, 2-2.5 cm distance from the midline in the same injury site

Sponsors

Samaa Rashwan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aging from 20 to 70 years old. * ASA physical status status I-II -- Patients suffering from blunt chest trauma with unilateral multiple rib fractures.

Exclusion criteria

• Spinal cord injury. * Epidural or spinal cord haematoma. * Thoracic vertebral body fracture. * Spinal injury awaiting assessment. * Coagulopathy (platelets \<50×109 litre-1, INR\>1.5). * Local infection or sepsis. * Allergy to local anaesthetic. * Inability to position patient due to associated injuries. * Severe traumatic brain injury. * Unstable lumbar or cervical spinal fractures. * Hypotension. * Hypovolaemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary outcome of this study was to compare ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane block and ultrasound guided paravertebral block as regard the efficacy of analgesia in patients with blunt chest trauma with unilateral multiple rib fracturesVAS will be recorded before performing the technique , this will be the base line record, then it will be compared by the value of VAS 30 minutes after performing the technique and the value of VAS at 1, 3, 6,12 and 24 hourspain will be assessed by the visual analogue scale(VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
total dose of rescue analgesiathe observation will be for 24 hoursAnalgesic requirement in the form of 25 mg pethidin intravenously if VAS score \>3

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSamaa A Rashwan, MD
samakassemrashwan@gmail.com020120159125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026