Keratoconus
Conditions
Brief summary
To our knowledge, this study is one of the first to compare the visual results of non-topography-guided and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) applying sequential and simultaneous corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment for keratoconus. Considering recent advances in cross-linking and imaging in keratoconus, the outcomes of this study can lead us to several non-invasive algorithm management options.
Detailed description
Interventional and comparative prospective study: Sixty-nine eyes (38 patients) suffering from keratoconus (stages 1-2 Amsler-Krumeich classification) were divided into four groups. The four groups underwent topography- and non-topography-guided PRK with sequential and simultaneous CXL. The main outcome measures were pre- and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, and keratometry.
Interventions
PROCEDUREPhotorefractive keratectomy in mile keratoconus
Topo-guided photorefractive keratectomy will be performed using an excimer laser (Allegretto Wave Topolyzer, Alcon, Inc.) with a 6 mm optical area and a transition area of 2 mm in all eyes. At that point, the partial topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy laser treatment will be finished. The arrangement will be to treat 70% of the cylindrical and spherical part to not surpass 50μm of stromal expulsion. The estimation of 50μm as the most extreme removal depth recommended by Kanellopoulos in Athens protocol will be chosen
Sponsors
Shahid Beheshti University
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
34 Years to 41 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* age 34 (range from 34 to 41) * stable corneal topography and refraction for at least six months * estimated residual bed thickness of \>410 µm Exclusion * presence of macular or retinal disease, * dry eye * history of recurrent corneal erosions * anterior segment abnormalities * unstable refractive error * post-surgically residual stromal bed thickness of under 350 mm * autoimmune disease * collagen vascular disease * immunosuppressive therapy or current use of systemic corticosteroids * diabetes mellitus * pregnancy * lactation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| visual acuity | 3 months | Visual acuity (VA) commonly refers to the clarity of vision |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Aberrometry properties by iTrace Ray-tracing aberrometry | 3 year | Optical aberrations are a major cause for poor quality of vision. It occurs when light from one point, after transmission through an optical system, does not converge to or diverge from a single point. Any deviation of the optical system from paraxial optics results in aberrations. In the eye, the various refracting surfaces like tear film, cornea and lens are primarily responsible for inducing ocular aberrations. The difference in shape of the wave-front entering the eye and that exiting the eye defines the type of aberration. The ocular aberrations are classified into lower order aberration (LOA) (zero order- piston; first order- horizontal and vertical tilt; second order- spherical defocus and astigmatism) and higher order aberrations (HOA) (third order - coma and trefoil; fourth order - quatrefoil, secondary astigmatism and spherical aberrations; fifth order - pentafoil; sixth order - hexafoil). |
Countries
Iran
Outcome results
None listed