Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Conditions
Keywords
pulmonary rehabilitation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Brief summary
Pulmonary rehabilitation should be initiated and lifelong at the time of diagnosis for patients with IPF. However, the symptoms of the disease and its progression limit clinical options in terms of participation and sustainability in rehabilitation programs. For this purpose, patients with IPF need physiotherapy and rehabilitation options that will not increase the symptoms associated with exercise and contribute to the program in the long term. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a rehabilitation option that can be applied to specific muscle groups without the ventilator and cardiac load especially in patients who can not actively exercise or have decreased muscle strength. In adult patients with an advanced disease characterized by reduced muscle strength, the use of NMES in addition to aerobic exercise programs is recommended as part of rehabilitation programs. In the literature, no studies investigating the efficacy of NMES have been found in individuals with IPF or interstitial lung disease. NMES application in addition to aerobic exercise seems to be a reasonable option when considering the symptoms of patients with IPF and the progression of the disease. The aim of this project is to investigate the efficacy of NMES in addition to aerobic exercise in IPF patients based on evidence by objective methods.
Detailed description
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fibrotic interstitial lung disease characterized by progressive dyspnoea, reduced exercise capacity, quality of life, and classified as a rare disease. With the increase in medical treatment options, the progression of the disease slows down. Increased time of survival has increased the need for pulmonary rehabilitation programs that have been shown to be effective in patients' exercise capacity, participation in daily living activities, and improvement in the quality of life. Patients with IPF have been shown to be able to improve dyspnoea, fatigue, exercise capacity, daily living activities and quality of life with home-based or supervised breathing, posture, strengthening and aerobic/endurance exercise programs. Pulmonary rehabilitation should be initiated and lifelong at the time of diagnosis for patients with IPF. However, the symptoms of the disease and its progression limit clinical options in terms of participation and sustainability in rehabilitation programs. For this purpose, patients with IPF need physiotherapy and rehabilitation options that will not increase the symptoms associated with exercise and contribute to the program in the long term. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a rehabilitation option that can be applied to specific muscle groups without the ventilator and cardiac load especially in patients who can not actively exercise or have decreased muscle strength. In adult patients with an advanced disease characterized by reduced muscle strength, the use of NMES in addition to aerobic exercise programs is recommended as part of rehabilitation programs. In the literature, no studies investigating the efficacy of NMES have been found in individuals with IPF or interstitial lung disease. NMES application in addition to aerobic exercise seems to be a reasonable option when considering the symptoms of patients with IPF and the progression of the disease. The aim of this project is to investigate the efficacy of NMES in addition to aerobic exercise in IPF patients based on evidence by objective methods.
Interventions
OTHERAerobic exercise
A 20-30 minutes low-medium intensity aerobic exercise training with cycling ergometer.
OTHERNeuromuscular electrical stimulation
Bilateral NMES application on Quadriceps femoris muscle will be applied as symmetrical biphasic square wave current with a wave frequency of 35-60 Hz, phase transition time of 8 seconds and active resting time of 15 seconds
Sponsors
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Istanbul University
Biruni University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The assessor will be blind to the randomization and the investigator will be blind to the results of assessments.
Intervention model description
Thirty IPF patients aged 40-80 years who are followed up at Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty Chest Disease Department will include in the study. Participants will be divided into two groups as the NMES group and the Sham Training Group, using a computer-assisted randomization table.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* A diagnosis of IPF according to current ATS / ERS guidelines has been followed by a pulmonary specialist for at least 6 months * Patients who are clinically stable, have no flare or infection.
Exclusion criteria
* Orthopedic and neurological problems that may interfere with exercise training, * Modification of medical treatment during the study, * Unstable cardiac diseases, * Participation in another pulmonary rehabilitation program over the past 12 months, * Inadequate cooperation, * Contraindications for the application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (risk of embolism, neoplasm, infection in the region of application, pacemaker, sensory defect).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of exercise capacity | 2 months | Exercise capacity will be assessed with 6-minutes walk test. The six minutes walking distance will be recorded in metres. |
| Assessment of endurance capacity | 2 months | Endurance capacity will be assessed with Shuttle Endurance Walking test. The number of shuttles will be recorded and maximum VO2 will be calculated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of peripheral muscle strength | 2 months | Peripheral muscle strength will be assessed with hand held dynamometer for quadriceps muscles. |
| Assessment of fatigue | 2 months | Fatigue will be assessed with Fatigue Severity Scale. The scale consists 9 questions. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 63. Higher scores indicate worse fatigue level. |
| Assessment of activities of daily living | 2 months | The activities of daily living will be assessed by The London Chest Daily Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. The scale has 4 subgroups; self-care (4 question), about home (six question), physical activity (2 question) and leisure time (3 question). The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 75. Higher scores indicate worse conditions. |
| Assessment of quality of life: Saint George Quality of Life Survey | 2 months | The quality of life will be assessed by Saint George Quality of Life Survey. The scale consists 50 questions. The minimum score is 0 and the maksimum score is 100. Higher scores indicate poor quality of life. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed