Skip to content

Stretching Versus Traction in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy.

Which is Better to Decompress the Nerve Roots in Cervical Radiculopathy: Stretching or Traction From Foraminal Opening Position

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03888573
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-03-25
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2019-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy

Keywords

Stretching, Traction Decompression

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of traction decompression and neck muscle stretching on the magnitude of Flexor Carpi Radialis H-Reflex(HR), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Detailed description

Cervical traction has long been used to relieve compression of nerve roots caused by intervertebral discs. Yet, there is lack of knowledge that compares the effect of traction decompression with neck muscles stretching in patients with cervical radiculopathy

Interventions

Patients within Stretch Group will receive stretching protocols to the cervical musculature at the side of symptoms. Traction Group will be treated with traction from 15-degree flexion, 30-degree lateral bending, and 15-degree rotation toward the painful side.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups; A and B. Patients within Group (A) will receive stretching protocols to the cervical musculature at the side of symptoms. Group (B) will be treated with traction from 15-degree flexion, 30-degree lateral bending, and 15-degree rotation toward the painful side.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients should have C5-C6 and C6-C7 paramedian disc protrusion manifested by unilateral symptoms in C6-C7 roots dermatome and myotomes of the upper extremities. * They were diagnosed as cervical disc protrusion (C5- C7) for at least three months. * All patients should have a second grade of disc bulge (2-3mm) which was detected from T2 axial view of MRI.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded from the study if they have upper cervical spine disc pathology, cord compression and upper motor neuron symptoms, curvature abnormalities of the neck including reversed curve (kyphotic) and deformities, cervical rib syndrome, double crush syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, text neck , short neck (Churchill neck), Marked facet joint, neuro-central joint arthropathic pathology, osteoporosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Flexor Carpi radialis H-reflexchange from Baseline after 6-week of treamentThe peak-to-peak amplitudes of the four FCR-HR traces will be measured and averaged for each patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Visual Analogue Scale Pain Scores(VAS)Change from Baseline after 6-week of treamentA 10-cm VAS was used for assessing pain intensity. It is a line whose ends are labeled as the extremes of pain; no pain and very extreme pain. The line is marked at intervals 1 cm each without any label. Patients will be simply asked to indicate which point along the line that best represents the intensity of perceived pain. The distance from the no pain end to the mark made by the patient will be measured as the patient's pain intensity score.
The Neck Disability Index (NDI)Change from Baseline after 6-week of treatmentThe NDI will be measured on a 6-point scale from 0 (no disability) to 5 (full disability). The numeric response for each item will be summed for a score varying from 0 to 50. The NDI consists of 10 sections, each section the total possible score is 5, if the first statement is marked; the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. The patients will choose the best choice that reflect his current state. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated by dividing the obtained score on the total number of scores e.g. if the score recorded by the patients was (40) so the NDI=(40/50)x100=80%

Contacts

Primary ContactAbeer Farag Hanafy, Lecturer
abeerfarag22@gmail.com01063044443
Backup ContactMahmoud Mohamed Aly, Master
dr3mpt@yahoo.com0237617691

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026