Skip to content

Mind-Body Approaches for Medical Conditions

Effectiveness of Mind-Body Approaches for Three Distinct Medical Conditions: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Television Broadcast Experiment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03888261
Enrollment
90
Registered
2019-03-25
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2020-01-01
Last updated
2019-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Psoriasis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

Chronic diseases are currently the most prevalent and most costly health conditions world-wide, and morbidity is expected to increase over coming years. Factors such that increased life-expectancy and certain life style-related factors, such as smoking, high-fat diet and alcohol-consumption, are commonly associated with the increase in most of the common chronic diseases. However, more complex psychosocial factors such as depression, stress, work-related dynamics and thinking patterns are thought be associated with poor health status and impaired health related quality of life among patients with suffering from chronic physical conditions (i.e. a biopsychosocial approach). Therefore, psychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. The aim of this randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of mind-body multidisciplinary rehabilitation on health-related quality of life, and disease specific endpoints in people with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or heart failure.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMind-Body Approaches for Medical Conditions

The intervention programme of the present trial is delivered in a group-based format (15 participants per group) and overall applies three therapeutic components: 1. Contemplative practices 2. Psychoeducation 3. Dialogue, including therapist-group dialogue as well as participant-participant dialogue.

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Department of psychology, University of Copenhagen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Rheumatoid arthritis: * RA according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria * Not selected on the basis of their level of activity. * The treatment of both the RA and any other medical condition have to be stable and constant for at least three months at the time of enrolment, and no future planned changes of therapy exist at the time of inclusion. * Oral corticosteroids, if used previously, will be allowed at a maximum prednisone dose with an equivalent of 10mg/day. Psoriasis: * Diagnosed plaque psoriasis for 6 months or longer * Psoriasis medical condition have to be stable and constant for at least three months at the time of enrolment (i.e. no future planned changes of therapy exist at the time of inclusion). *

Exclusion criteria

are other immune-mediated conditions requiring current systemic immunosuppressant treatment except psoriatic arthritis. Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction: * Symptomatic patients (NYHA class II or III, or NYHA class IV if CRT planned at enrolment) with systolic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) will be considered eligible for enrolment. * The qualifying left ventricular ejection fraction (measured on stable heart failure medication).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WHO-Five Well-being IndexAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. The WHO-5 consists of five statements. The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability
SF36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.
Illness Perception QuestionnaireAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. Every item is rated using a 0-10 response scale, a higher score reflecting a more threatening view of the illness.
Pittsburgh sleep quality indexAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. Blood sample
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale-5At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. To score the scale, simply compute a mean of the 15 items. Higher scores reflect higher levels of dispositional mindfulness
Self-Compassion ScaleAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. As a rough guide, a score of 1-2.5 for your overall self-compassion score indicates you are low in self-compassion, 2.5-3.5 indicates you are moderate, and 3.5-5.0 means you are high.
Cohen's Perceived Stress ScaleAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. ► Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. ► Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. ► Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineAll participants. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. The HADS uses a scale and therefore the data returned from the HADS is ordinal. Higher score indicates worse depression or anxiety.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tender jointsAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineRheumatoid Arthritis.28 joints palpates with a 4 kg pressure. The patient state the perception on pain on a scale from 1-10 cm. A higher score indicates higher pain.
Swollen jointsAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineRheumatoid Arthritis. Assessed by a train physician.
VAS-PainAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineRheumatoid Arthritis. Score range from 1-100. Higher score indicates worse pain.
VAS-Patient global assessmentAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineRheumatoid Arthritis. using visual analog scale (VAS) (participant global VAS). DAS28 was calculated using following formula: DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*Patient's Global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Psoriasis Area and Severity IndexAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselinePsoriasis. ASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 to 72.Higher score indicates worse psoriasis.
Physician Global Assessment (PGA)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselinePsoriasis. Scores range from 100 (extremely high functioning) to 1 (severely impaired).
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselinePsoriasis. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The DLQI can also be expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score of 30.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireAt baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineHeart Failure with reduced ejection fraction. In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status
Disease activity score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP)At baseline, 10-12 weeks (1-2 weeks post-intervention), and 26 weeks from baselineRheumatoid Arthritis.

Contacts

Primary ContactLina Khoury Aerts, PhD
lkho0011@regionh.dk0045 61660623
Backup ContactLone Skov, Professor
lone.skov.02@regionh.dk0045 38673204

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026