Skip to content

Automated Geriatric Co-Management Program in Older Patients With Solid Mass or Nodule Suspicious for Cancer

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Automated Geriatric Co-Management Program on Improving the Perioperative Care of Older Patients With Solid Mass or Nodule Suspicious for Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03885908
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-03-22
Start date
2019-03-19
Completion date
2022-12-21
Last updated
2024-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

Automated Geriatric Co-Management Program, Perioperative Care, Solid mass, Nodule, 19-066

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if it is possible to use the automated geriatric co-management program to manage the participants care before, during and after surgery.

Interventions

OTHERin-person geriatric co-management

The geriatrics service sees these patients for at least 2 postoperative days, if deemed clinically necessary by the geriatrician. During the inpatient hospital course, the geriatrics service will ensure the execution of preoperative recommendations and will discuss with the surgical team, who will act as a primary team, any additional recommendation in order to improve postoperative care. In-person geriatric consults to be done via telemedicine due to the current pandemic and consideration for patient safety.

OTHERautomated geriatric co-management

Following completion of the eRFA, the summary of impairments as well as the recommendations generated by the study team (hard-copy or email) will be provided in real-time to the surgery team for their attention.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Solid mass or nodule suspicious for cancer * Aged 65 or older * Being considered for surgical resection of the solid mass or nodule, with anticipated hospital length of stay of at least two days, * Completed the eRFA per routine care

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to read or comprehend English * Not having a completed electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment within 2 months of surgery\*\*Note) To avoid excluding patients based this item, patients have to complete another eRFA within two months of surgery. * Being discharged in one day or earlier from the hospital.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Automated Geriatric Co-management Program2 yearspercentage of recommendations that were followed by the surgery team

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
In-person Geriatric Co-management Group
In-person geriatric consults to be done via telemedicine due to the current pandemic and consideration for patient safety.
11
Automated Geriatric Co-management Program Group
automated geriatric co-management: Following completion of the eRFA, the summary of impairments as well as the recommendations generated by the study team (hard-copy or email) will be provided in real-time to the surgery team for their attention.
9
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPatient became ineligible becasue she underwent neoaedjuvant chemotherapy before surgery.10
Overall StudyPatient deemed to be ineligible due to language preference10
Overall StudyPatient did not undergo surgery within 2 months of consent.11
Overall StudyPatient unable to complete appointment - withdrawn from study01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIn-person Geriatric Co-management GroupAutomated Geriatric Co-management Program GroupTotal
Age, Continuous75 years76 years76 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 110 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of Automated Geriatric Co-management Program

percentage of recommendations that were followed by the surgery team

Time frame: 2 years

Population: N/A data were not collected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026