Skip to content

Strengthening Effect on Hamstring's Passive Mechanical Properties

Effects Of Different Strengthening Methods On Hamstring Muscle Group's Passive Mechanical Properties in Healthy Individuals

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03884738
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-03-21
Start date
2019-03-21
Completion date
2019-12-01
Last updated
2020-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Muscle Tonus, Elasticity, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Physical Conditioning, Human

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of different strengthening methods on hamstring muscle group's passive mechanical properties and to investigate this effect's relation with performance changes in healthy individuals. 42 healthy sedentary male participated in this study. Passive mechanical properties and strength of hamstring and quadriceps muscles, flexibility of hamstring muscles, anaerobic explosive strength, reaction time, agility were measured. Participants randomized evenly into one of three groups; eccentric, concentric and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). After 8 weeks training period, participants were measured again.

Interventions

Leg Curl Machine: 1st week - 1st day is 10 maximum repeat test. 2nd week - 2 days of training - 2 sets of 6 repeats. %60 percent of maximum load. 3rd week - 3 days of training - 3 sets of 6-8 repeats. %60-80 of maximum load. 4th-8th week - 3 days of training - 3 sets of 8-12 repeats. when 3 sets of 12 achieved, load was increased with 2.5kg.

OTHERNordic Eccentric exercise

1. st week - 1 day - 2 sets of 5 repeats. 2. nd week - 2 days - 2 sets of 6 repeats. 3. rd week - 3 days - 3 sets of 6-8 repeats. 4. th week - 3 days - 3 sets of 8-10 repeats. 5-8th weeks - 3 days - 3 sets of 12-8 repeats. When achieved 3 sets of 12 repeats with full range, speed was increased.

OTHERNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

8 weeks, three times per week, 15 minutes of bilateral hamstring stimulation. 100 Hz. frequency, 600 microsecond duration rectangular current

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomization into three groups and measurement before and after intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being sedentary

Exclusion criteria

* Having knee, hip and/or back pain * Having a cardiovascular condition/disease * History of previous knee and/or hip surgery * Having a diagnose of any systemic disease * History of previous hamstring injury * Being physically active within last year ( Regular activity at least 3 days a week and continuity of at least 2 months was accepted as being physically active)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Passive Mechanical PropertiesChange from baseline passive mechanical properties at 8 weeksTone, Elasticity and Stiffness evaluation. Evaluated with Myotonometer-3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flexibility MeasurementChange from baseline flexibility at 8 weeksSit and reach test was used for hamstring flexibility
Muscle Strength MeasurementChange from baseline muscle strength at 8 weeksHamstring and Quadriceps strength were measured with LaFayette Manuel Muscle Tester
Agility MeasurementChange from baseline agility time at 8 weeksIllinois Agility Test was used for agility measurement
Anaerobic Explosive PowerChange from baseline anaerobic explosive power at 8 weeksJump and Reach test was administered
Reaction TimeChange from baseline reaction time at 8 weeksruler drop test was used for reaction timing

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026