Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Conditions
Keywords
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, gastric neoplasm, artificial intelligence, quality control
Brief summary
The aim of our study was to develop an automatic quality-control system and assess the performance of this system in quality control of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Detailed description
In this study, the researchers firstly developed an automatic quality-control system, name as EAS. Next, the researchers applied the system in a endoscopic center and designed a prospective randomised controlled trial to investigate the performance of the system in quality control of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Interventions
OTHERautomatic quality-control system
Automatic quality-control system could real-time measuring endoscopic inspection completeness, detecting gastric neoplasms and evaluating gastric mucosal visibility.
Sponsors
Yanqing Li
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients undergoing EGD examination with anaesthesia; * patients able to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* patients with the contraindications to EGD examination; * patients with a prior EGD examination within 1 year before the trial; * patients with frankly upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions that were apparent on endoscopy; * a history of upper gastrointestinal cancers; * allergic to anaesthetic in previous medical history; * patients refused to participate in the trial; * the EGD procedure cannot be completed due to stenosis, obstruction, solid food, or complications of anaesthesia.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| detection rate of gastric neoplasms | 8 months | detection rate of gastric neoplasms in different groups |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| mean number of gastric neoplasms detected | 8 months | mean number of gastric neoplasms detected per procedure in different groups |
| mean inspection completeness | 8 months | inspection completeness per procedure in different groups |
| mean inspection time | 8 months | inspection time per procedure in different groups |
| errors of EAS | 8 months | errors of EAS in EAS-aided group |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed