Skip to content

The RENEW Trial: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

The RENEW Trial: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03879863
Enrollment
422
Registered
2019-03-19
Start date
2019-04-16
Completion date
2019-10-04
Last updated
2025-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The RENEW Trial is a Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Vehicle in Subjects with Dry Eye Disease

Interventions

DRUGReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered QID for twelve weeks

DRUGVehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered QID for twelve weeks

DRUGReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID to BID

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered QID for four weeks, followed by BID administration for eight weeks

DRUGVehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID to BID

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered QID for four weeks, followed by BID administration for eight weeks

Sponsors

Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race; * Have a reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1; * Have a history of use or desire to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1

Exclusion criteria

* Have any clinically significant slit-lamp findings at Visit 1, including active blepharitis; meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD); lid margin inflammation; or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, or, in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the assessment of the safety or efficacy of reproxalap or vehicle; * Have or be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1; * Have worn contact lenses within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the study; * Have used any eye drops within 2 hours of Visit 1; * Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months; * Have used ophthalmic cyclosporine or lifitegrast 5.0% ophthalmic solution within 90 days of Visit 1; * Have any planned ocular and/or lid surgeries over the study period or any ocular surgery within 6 months of Visit 1; * Have used temporary or permanent punctal plugs within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or anticipate their use during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))The efficacy assessment period (Day 1 through 85) was assessed at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12; baseline was Day 1.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular dryness score VAS (0 = no discomfort - 100 = maximal discomfort), where a higher score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline calculated using baseline score, treatment arm, visit, and the interaction of treatment arm and visit as fixed effects.
Fluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)The efficacy assessment period (Day 15 through 85) was assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12; baseline was Day 1.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for fluorescein staining of the nasal region (0 = none - 4 = severe), where a higher score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline calculated using baseline fluorescein nasal score, treatment arm, visit, and the interaction of treatment arm and visit as fixed effects.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered QID for twelve weeks
105
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered QID for twelve weeks
106
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID to BID
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered QID for four weeks, followed by BID administration for eight weeks
105
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID to BID
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered QID for four weeks, followed by BID administration for eight weeks
106
Total422

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QIDVehicle Ophthalmic Solution QIDReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID to BIDVehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID to BIDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
65 Participants56 Participants62 Participants57 Participants240 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants50 Participants43 Participants49 Participants182 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants8 Participants8 Participants8 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
96 Participants98 Participants97 Participants98 Participants389 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Black
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Blue
32 Participants38 Participants34 Participants26 Participants130 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Brown
41 Participants37 Participants44 Participants53 Participants175 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Gray
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Green
12 Participants10 Participants14 Participants12 Participants48 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Hazel
18 Participants20 Participants13 Participants12 Participants63 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Black
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Blue
32 Participants38 Participants34 Participants26 Participants130 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Brown
41 Participants37 Participants44 Participants53 Participants175 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Gray
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Green
12 Participants10 Participants14 Participants12 Participants48 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Hazel
18 Participants20 Participants13 Participants12 Participants63 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants9 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants7 Participants6 Participants7 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
92 Participants91 Participants90 Participants90 Participants363 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
105 Participants106 Participants105 Participants106 Participants422 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants77 Participants75 Participants82 Participants312 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants29 Participants30 Participants24 Participants110 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1050 / 1060 / 1050 / 106
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 1057 / 10694 / 1051 / 106
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1053 / 1061 / 1052 / 106

Outcome results

Primary

Fluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for fluorescein staining of the nasal region (0 = none - 4 = severe), where a higher score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline calculated using baseline fluorescein nasal score, treatment arm, visit, and the interaction of treatment arm and visit as fixed effects.

Time frame: The efficacy assessment period (Day 15 through 85) was assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12; baseline was Day 1.

Population: Intent-to-Treat Fluorescein Nasal Score Population with observed data only

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QIDFluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QIDFluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID to BIDFluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)-0.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.056
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID to BIDFluorescein Nasal Region Score (0 = None - 4 = Severe)-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.053
Primary

Subject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular dryness score VAS (0 = no discomfort - 100 = maximal discomfort), where a higher score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline calculated using baseline score, treatment arm, visit, and the interaction of treatment arm and visit as fixed effects.

Time frame: The efficacy assessment period (Day 1 through 85) was assessed at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12; baseline was Day 1.

Population: Intent-to-treat Ocular Dryness Population with observed data only

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QIDSubject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))-11.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.44
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QIDSubject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))-15.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.39
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) QID to BIDSubject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))-17.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution QID to BIDSubject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026