Skip to content

The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease (PD)

The Effect of High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03879551
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-03-18
Start date
2019-03-15
Completion date
2019-06-15
Last updated
2021-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease With Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the therapeutic role of rTMS on parkinson's patients with cognitive impairment. Patients diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease and cognitive impairment will be recruited. All patients will be admitted and will be allocated randomly into two groups one of which will receive real sessions of high frequency rTMS for each hemisphere for 10 consecutive sessions totally over period of 10 days with repeated booster sessions every month during the period of follow up. The other will receive sham sessions.

Detailed description

This study aims to assess the therapeutic role of rTMS on parkinson's patients with cognitive impairment. Thirty PD patients with cognitive impairment using United Kingdom (UK ) bank criteria for PD will be recruited from outpatient clinic in Assiut University. All patients will be admitted at Neuropsychiatric Department, Assiut University Hospital/ Assiut, Egypt.Each patient fulfilled the inclusion criteria as having score less than 24 on Mini-Mental Status Examination will be recruited. The patients will be allocated randomly into two groups one of which will receive real sessions of high frequency rTMS (25 HZ), with intensity of 80% of resting motor threshold detected from the hand motor area, with total 2000 pulses for each hemisphere for 10 consecutive sessions totally over period of 10 days with repeated booster session every month during the period of follow up among three months. The other will receive sham sessions. All subjects will be followed up by selected clinical rating scales at different intervals pre session, post 10 sessions, and after one, two and three months.

Interventions

DEVICErepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

By defining intensity of 80% of the resting Motor Threshold detected from motor area for Rt Abductor digiti minimi (ADM), we will apply repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) using 70-mm diameter air-cooled figure-of-8 coil and SuperRapid2 Magnetic Stimulator with high frequency (25Hz), Stimuli will be delivered for total 2000 pulse (divided on 50 trains with 40 pulses per train with inter-train interval 30 seconds) for each hemisphere (coil placed tangential over the optimal position of hand motor area detected for Real group and the same coil placed perpendicular with hand of coil pointing upward over occipital cortex for Sham group). Sessions will be consecutive for ten days period with repetition of consecutive 5 sessions as boosting doses on 5 days period over the follow up visits every month for the next 3 months.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with Parkinson's Disease who were diagnosed according to UK bank criteria for PD, Aged 45-75 years, with criteria for cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental Status Examination\< 24), and consent obtained from the patient or his caregiver.

Exclusion criteria

* History of repeated head injury * History of repeated cerebrovascular strokes * History of defined encephalitis * Oculogyric crisis, supranuclear gaze palsy * Family history of more than one relative * History of drug intake as antipsychotics or 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) exposure * Moderate and Severe depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score \>16) * severe dysautonomia * Cerebellar signs * Babinski sign * Strictly unilateral features after 3 years * Hydrocephalus or intracranial lesion on neuroimaging * We also excludes patients with intracranial metallic devices or with pacemakers or any other device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)three monthsany changes in MMSE along the course of follow up (baseline, post treatment, one, two and three months later). Any score greater than or equal to 24 points (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition. Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points) or mild (19-23 points) cognitive impairment.
changes in Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA)3 monthsany changes of Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA)along the course of follow up (baseline, post treatment, one, two and three months later). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal. In a study, people without cognitive impairment scored an average of 27.4; people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) scored an average of 22.1; people with Alzheimer's disease scored an average of 16.2.
Event related potential P30010 dayschanges in Event related potential P300 latency and amplitude (pre sessions -post sessions)As cognitive impairment elongates the P300 latency, we hypotheses that P300 could be a monitoring biomarker for rTMS effect, on cognitive function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
motor part of Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS)3 monthschanges in motor part of Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS)along the course of follow up (baseline, post treatment, one, two and three months later)
changes in cortical excitability10 dayschanges in cortical excitability (baseline, post treatment)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026