Skip to content

Using Interactive Virtual Presence to Remotely Assist Parents With Child Restraint Installations

Using Interactive Virtual Presence to Remotely Assist Parents With Child Restraint Installations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03877744
Enrollment
1498
Registered
2019-03-18
Start date
2020-01-23
Completion date
2024-02-28
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Car Seat Installation

Brief summary

Motor vehicle crashes cause the death of an American child every 3 hours, more than any other cause. When installed correctly, car seats reduce risk of serious injury and death to infants and young children. Unfortunately, a large portion of child restraints is installed incorrectly. A network of trained technicians work across the country to assist parents in achieving correct use of child restraints through scheduled car seat checks, where technicians work with parents to install restraints in their vehicles. Car seat checks are effective in reducing errors in child restraint installations. However, the services are highly underutilized. The present study evaluates use of interactive virtual presence technology (also called interactive merged reality) to remotely assist parents to install child restraints correctly into their vehicles. Building from small pilot studies on the topic, the investigators will conduct a randomized non-inferiority trial to evaluate whether parents who install child restraints while communicating with a remote expert technician via interactive virtual presence achieve installations and learning that are not inferior in their safety to parents who install restraints live with a remote technician onsite. The investigators will recruit 1476 parents at 7 locations nationwide and randomly assign consenting parents to install their child restraint either via interactive virtual presence or with a live technician. The correctness of installation safety will be assessed using objective checklists, both following installation and again four months later. The investigators aim to demonstrate that child restraint installation is accurate (\>90% correct) when conducted remotely via interactive virtual presence, that such installations are not inferior to the accuracy of installation with a live on-site expert, and that parents learn and retain information about correct child restraint installation.

Detailed description

Motor vehicle crashes cause the death of an American child every 3 hours, more than any other cause. When installed correctly, car seats (also called child restraints) reduce risk of serious injury and death to infants and young children roughly threefold. Unfortunately, a large portion of child restraints is installed incorrectly. A network of trained technicians, many affiliated with Safe Kids Worldwide, work across the country to assist parents in achieving correct use of child restraints through scheduled car seat checks, where technicians work with parents to install restraints in their vehicles. Car seat checks are effective in reducing errors in child restraint installations. However, the services are highly underutilized due to barriers in access, scheduling complications, and resources to staff the car seat checks sufficiently to meet demand. The present study evaluates use of interactive virtual presence technology (also called interactive merged reality) - joint and simultaneous remote verbal and visual interaction and exposure to the same 3D stimuli - to remotely assist parents to install child restraints correctly into their vehicles. If effective, this technology could supplement or replace car seat checks, significantly reduce the number of errors made in car seat installations nationwide, and revolutionize how government, industry, and non-profit agencies help parents install restraints. Building from small pilot studies on the topic, the investigators propose a large randomized non-inferiority trial to evaluate whether parents, including especially underserved parents in rural areas and/or of underrepresented racial or ethnic minority background, who install child restraints while communicating with a remote expert technician via interactive virtual presence achieve installations and learning that are not inferior in their safety to parents who install restraints live with a remote technician onsite. Non-inferiority trials are a type of randomized trial whereby a novel treatment (in this case, interactive virtual presence to install child restraints) is compared to an existing treatment known to be effective (in this case, live one-on-one installation of restraints) to demonstrate the novel treatment does not perform inferiorly to the existing treatment known to be effective. To accomplish the study goals, the investigators will recruit 1476 parents at 7 Safe Kids locations nationwide and randomly assign consenting parents to install their child restraint either via interactive virtual presence or with a live technician. The correctness of installation safety will be assessed using objective checklists, both following installation and again four months later. The investigators aim to demonstrate that child restraint installation is accurate (\>90% correct) when conducted remotely via interactive virtual presence, that such installations are not inferior to the accuracy of installation with a live on-site expert, and that parents learn and retain information about correct child restraint installation.

Interventions

parents will install car seat through remote guidance via interactive virtual presence

BEHAVIORALlive technician

parents will install car seat through guidance from a live certified technician who is present

Sponsors

Safe Kids Worldwide
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomized non-inferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* own a vehicle and have a child who rides in that vehicle using a child restraint fastened with a harness.

Exclusion criteria

* not physically capable of installing a child restraint into a vehicle, which may exclude individuals with various disabilities. * not able to communicate orally in English or Spanish, although significant demand for training in other languages may alter this

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Inspection Points Correctly Installed From Pre Installation to Post Installationbaseline to post intervention about an hour laterPercentage of inspection points in car seat installation that are correctly installed, as assessed using objective scoring scheme

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interactive Virtual Presence
Participants will engage remotely with a certified child restraint technician via interactive virtual presence. They will work together to help the participant install his or her child restraint properly into his or her vehicle. Standard Safe Kids Worldwide protocols will be followed, with the exception that the interaction will occur remotely via interactive virtual presence. interactive virtual presence: parents will install car seat through remote guidance via interactive virtual presence
699
Live Technician
Participants will engage live with a certified child restraint technician. They will work together to help the participant install his or her child restraint properly into his or her vehicle. Standard Safe Kids Worldwide protocols will be followed. live technician: parents will install car seat through guidance from a live certified technician who is present
799
Total1,498

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInteractive Virtual PresenceLive TechnicianTotal
Age, Continuous35.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13
34.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.91
35.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.55
Participants who drive a vehicle with young children699 Participants799 Participants1498 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American or Black
85 Participants113 Participants198 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Asian-American, or Pacific Islander
91 Participants71 Participants162 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian or White
409 Participants449 Participants858 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
110 Participants135 Participants245 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
46 Participants59 Participants105 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixxing
46 Participants59 Participants105 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American, American Indian, or Alaskan Native
10 Participants19 Participants29 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
512 Participants556 Participants1068 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
38 Participants53 Participants91 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Prefer not to answer
31 Participants49 Participants80 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
699 participants799 participants1498 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
female
548 Participants622 Participants1170 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
male
116 Participants126 Participants242 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
missing
29 Participants45 Participants74 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
non-binary
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
other
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
prefer not to answer
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6990 / 799
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6990 / 799
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6990 / 799

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Inspection Points Correctly Installed From Pre Installation to Post Installation

Percentage of inspection points in car seat installation that are correctly installed, as assessed using objective scoring scheme

Time frame: baseline to post intervention about an hour later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interactive Virtual PresencePercentage of Inspection Points Correctly Installed From Pre Installation to Post Installation95.78 percentage of inspection pointsStandard Deviation 6.92
Live TechnicianPercentage of Inspection Points Correctly Installed From Pre Installation to Post Installation97.33 percentage of inspection pointsStandard Deviation 6.12
p-value: 0.0008Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026