Skip to content

Comparison of Different Drilling Speed to Classify Bone Quality by Tactile Sensation on a Saw Bone Model

Comparison of Different Drilling Speed to Classify Bone Quality by Tactile Sensation on a Saw Bone Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03877419
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-03-15
Start date
2019-06-28
Completion date
2020-01-17
Last updated
2020-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant, Missing Teeth

Keywords

dental implant, bone quality, tactile sensation, drilling speed

Brief summary

Comparison of different drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model

Detailed description

Bone quality is one of the major factors influencing the dental implant survival rate. Bone quality is believed to have effects on initial implant stability and success of osseointegration. Different implant designs and surgical protocols were developed for improving the survival rate in different bone quality. Although bone quality can be partly diagnosed by radiographic images, lots of experienced surgeons also evaluate bone quality with tactile sensation when they drill the bone. However, variations in evaluation of bone density maybe exist among different surgeons. The drilling speed also may have effect on the outcome of evaluation. For less experienced dentists, it is difficult to diagnose bone quality with tactile sensation in the beginning. The purpose of this study is to find proper drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model. Saw bones of variant densities are used as training & testing materials. The proper drilling speed to distinguish different bone quality will be evaluated and offered to junior dentists for better implant treatment outcome.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult dentist, with license no more than 5 years * No clinical implant surgery experience or with experience less than 10 implants.

Exclusion criteria

-Subject who couldn't hold the test procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Units on a Visual Analog Score for bone density30 minutesthe range of the visual analog score was from 0 to 100, 0 indicated drilling into the air, 100 indicated drilling into the hardest jaw bone. The investigators will provide participants several saw bone blocks with different density. Participants needed to answer each bone density of blocks on the scale by drilling feedback sensation after drilling. It's better result that the answers close to the correct bone density of the saw bone blocks.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026