Skip to content

"Impact of Pelvic Floor Prehabilitation Using Biofeedback on the Severity of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing a Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer"

"Impact of Pelvic Floor Prehabilitation Using Biofeedback on the Severity of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing a Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer"

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03876561
Acronym
CONTICARE
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-03-15
Start date
2019-05-27
Completion date
2025-12-17
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Brief summary

There is currently no specific treatment and only few measures to prevent the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The LARS often results in a severe alteration of quality of life. This study is designed to assess pelvic floor prehabilitation using biofeedback in the prevention of LARS following total mesorectal excision for cancer. The pelvic floor rehabilitation with biofeedback has already been tested postoperatively in patients suffering from LARS with heterogeneous results. However, this rehabilitation has never been evaluated in the prevention of LARS. The prehabilitation is an innovative concept currently evaluated in the prevention of functional complications following orthopedic surgery and also prostate surgery. In high-risk abdominal surgery, cardiopulmonary prehabilitation offers satisfying results in terms of morbidity and mortality rates. This study will be the first to assess pelvic floor prehabilitation in the prevention of LARS.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPelvic floor prehabilitation

The systematic pelvic floor prehabilitation will start 4 weeks before stoma closure and will include 1 session per week before stoma closure and 1 session per week during 6 weeks following stoma closure. The prehabilitation will be performed according to a predefined protocol based on a biofeedback strategy.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 years old * Total mesorectal excision with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis protected by an ileostomy or a colostomy for rectal cancer * Absence of anastomotic leakage or stenosis * Informed consent to participate in the study * Social security insurance affiliation

Exclusion criteria

* History of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency and/or chronic diarrhea requiring a specific treatment before rectal cancer management * Absence of ileostomy or colostomy * Anastomotic leakage * Sensorial or cognitive disorders impeding pelvic floor rehabilitation exercise * Pregnant women * Minors * Adults under guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS score)6 months following stoma closurequestionnaire assessing the five symptoms of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome : fecal incontinence, gas incontinence, stool frequency, stool clustering and urgency.Total score is reported (minimum score :0 / maximal score : 42)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of fecal incontinence symptoms evaluated by the dedicated and validated score : Jorge and Wexner score6 months following stoma closurequestionnaire to assess the severity of fecal incontinence symptoms, including stool frequency, stool and gas leakage, social impact and the frequency of pads.a total score is reported (minimum score :0 / maximal score : 20)
Impact on quality of life evaluated by the dedicated and validated questionnaire6 months following stoma closurequestionnaire quality of life to assess the global quality of life in patients suffering from colorectal cancer Total score is reported
Morbidity of pelvic floor prehabilitation using biofeedback.6 months following stoma closureBiofeedback prehabilitation requires a small rectal manometry probe. This outcome will evaluate the morbidity of the rectal introduction of the probe following a colorectal anastomosis.
Medico-economic impact of pelvic floor prehabilitation including the fecal incontinence related costs6 months following stoma closureThe fecal incontinence related costs will be quantified by the data obtained from the social security insurance and the patients' estimation. The differential benefit of the pelvic floor prehabilitation will be correlated to the quality of life estimated by the QALYS using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026