Skip to content

Antibiotic Loaded Calcium Sulfate RCT

Performance of Antibiotic Impregnated Calcium Sulfate: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03875963
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-03-15
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2022-11-23
Last updated
2023-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fracture Non Union, Infection

Keywords

Infection, Antibiotic bone cement, Tibia nonunion

Brief summary

This is a multi-centered, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing current standard of care for defect management to placement of antibiotic loaded Stimulan as a bone void filler in patients undergoing treatment of infected tibial defects or infected tibial nonunions.

Detailed description

There is a tremendous burden of disease associated with infected bone defects and infected nonunions and their management is challenging. Infected bone defects and nonunions have a profound clinical and economic impact and outcomes are limited by high rates of re-operation and poor functional outcomes. Reconstruction of infected bone defects or nonunions is difficult with multiple treatment options that may be considered. A comprehensive approach includes the treatment of infection, the management of dead space, skeletal stabilization, stimulation of soft tissue healing and healing of the bone defect or nonunion. There is little evidence and a distinct lack of consensus regarding the definitive management of infected bone defects and infected nonunions. A two stage approach is still the gold standard for management and it remains unclear when alternative approaches should be considered. The first stage of the procedure includes adequate debridement, skeletal stabilization as required and placement of a polymethyl methacrylate cement spacer with or without antibiotics at the site of the bone defect. The second stage typically occurs between 6-8 weeks later with removal of the cement spacer and bone grafting into the preserved defect. There is no clear preferred management strategy and there remains a significant evidence gap. There has been a significant interest in the use of bone graft substitutes for defect management as part of the management of infected bone defects and infected nonunions. The use of calcium sulfate as an alternative synthetic bone graft material has long been established (1-4), and the combination of calcium sulfate with antibiotics has been reported in the literature almost as long as antibiotics have been available (5, 6). The clinical performance of calcium sulfate in combination with a single antibiotic, Tobramycin, is well documented (7, 8). However, in recent years, the use of calcium sulfate in combination with multiple antibiotics has grown in use as a means of providing protection from bacterial colonization by a wider variety of gram negative and gram positive pathogens (9-12). This study will evaluate the clinical performance of a high purity calcium sulfate bone void filler, STIMULAN® Rapid Cure. STIMULAN® Rapid Cure is intended to be gently packed into bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., extremities, pelvis, and posterolateral spine). STIMULAN® Rapid Cure provides a bone graft substitute that resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process. STIMULAN® Rapid Cure is biodegradable and biocompatible and may be used at an infected site. The proposed study is a multi-centered, prospective, randomized controlled trial, comparing current standard of care for defect management to placement of antibiotic loaded Stimulan as a bone void filler in patients undergoing treatment of infected tibial defects or infected tibial nonunions. Patients with an infected tibial bone defect or infected tibial nonunion meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized to receive either standard of care for defect management (Group A) or placement of antibiotic loaded Stimulan (10cc Stimulan Rapid Cure, 1g Vancomycin, 240mg Tobramycin) as a bone void filler (Group B), with a standardized intervention and post-intervention protocol.

Interventions

OTHERAntibiotic loaded bone filler

Defect management by placement of antibiotic loaded Stimulan as a bone void filler \[calcium sulfate bone void filler (10 cc of STIMULAN(R) Rapid Cure, Biocomposites Ltd, UK) combined with the following antibiotic combination: 1g Vancomycin, 240mg Tobramycin\].

Sponsors

Biocomposites Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Determination of union assessed by two independent assessors blinded to treatment arm

Intervention model description

The proposed study is a multi-centered, prospective, randomized controlled trial, comparing current standard of care for defect management to placement of antibiotic loaded Stimulan as a bone void filler in patients undergoing treatment of infected tibial defects or infected tibial nonunions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥16 years old. * Isolated infected tibia defect or infected tibial nonunion (characterized by clinical symptoms present for greater than 90 days, the presence of necrotic bone, and bacteria cultured from prior procedures, surgical biopsy, or draining sinuses).

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of previous vascular injury or pathologic fracture * Associated lower limb injuries that would interfere with rehabilitation or outcome * Refusal to participate * Inability to provide informed consent * Inability to speak/understand or read English without a registered interpreter. * Allergy or sensitivity to Vancomycin or Tobramycin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of re-operations2 years post-injuryNumber of re-operations to obtain union or manage malunion, implant failure, or to eradicate infection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Index In Trauma (FIX-IT) MeasureBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsThe scale consists of two subscales - a weightbearing subscale and a pain subscale. The weight-baring subscale consists of two weight-bearing measures (Single Leg Score and Ambulation Score) and the pain subscale consists of two pain assessment measures (Palpation Score and Stress Score). Each of the four measures are rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values representing a better outcome. For the weight bearing subscale, the Single Leg-Stand and the Ambulation Scores are added together, and for the pain subscale, the Palpation and the Stress Scores are added together for a total maximum score out of 6. The two subscales are added together at the end for a total maximum score of 12.
Patient reported outcomesBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsShort Musculoskeletal Function Assessment
EuroQol Group Quality of Life Scale with 5 Dimensions and 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsThe EuroQol5D-5L measures overall health and quality of life in 5 dimensions - Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression. Each subscale is given a score from 0 to 4, with higher scores representing a worse outcome. The 5 subscale scores are added together for a total maximum score out of 20. There is one additional question which asks the participant to rate their overall perceived health today on a scale from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst health they can imagine and 100 representing the best health they can imagine.
Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsPain measured using valid and reliable numeric pain rating scale. The scale measures the intensity of pain on a scale of 0 (meaning no pain) to 10 (worst pain). The scale asks the participant to rate the intensity of their pain in three ways -- their current pain level, their best pain level in the past 24 hours, and their worst pain level in the past 24 hours. The mean of all three scores is calculated by the research staff for a final average score. A lower score would indicate a better outcome, while a higher score would indicate a worse outcome.
Economic analysisBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsAmbulatory and Health Care Record to record economic burden on patient
Radiographic assessmentBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsa) Anteroposterior and lateral tibial x-rays of all patients will be obtained at the standard follow-up intervals and will be blinded and scored by two established orthopaedic surgeons who are familiar with the RUST and modified RUST assessment scales b) Defect size pre-treatment will be measured using anteroposterior and lateral tibial x-rays
Number of patients with complicationsBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 monthsComplications assessed will include nonunion, malunion, leg length discrepancy, infection, wound healing problems, and drainage

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026