Skip to content

Trochanteric Fractures - How to Improve the Results of Reduction and Implant Positioning

Structured Educational Program and the Use of a Practical Algorithm for Reduction and Stabilisation of Trochanteric Fractures With in Intramedullary Nail Improved Radiologic Reduction and Implant Positioning. A Prospective Study With 6 Months Follow-up.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03875443
Acronym
PERTROCH
Enrollment
250
Registered
2019-03-14
Start date
2020-01-08
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Keywords

implant positioning, reduction, intraoperative fluoroscopy, reduction algorithm

Brief summary

This prospective study (including patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures type 31A1, 31A2 and 31A3) is to assess the effect of an educational intervention for operating surgeons with respect to an improvement of the quality of reduction and internal stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures. A historic cohort of patients operated at the University Hospital Basel for an intertrochanteric fracture from 2014-2015 will be used for comparison.

Detailed description

Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most frequent fracture type in the elderly population usually occurring in patients older than 60 years of age. Almost all fractures are treated operatively with reduction and stabilisation of the fracture using either a dynamic hip screw or an intramedullary nail. The reduction of the fracture and positioning of the implant are surgeon dependent factors and can be influenced by educational interventions. The investigators hypothesized that a structured educational program on the optimal use of intraoperative fluoroscopy to control the quality of reduction and the position of the implant, as well as the provision of a practical algorithm intraoperatively guiding reduction and stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures would improve the radiologic outcome.

Interventions

Video (produced by AO Trauma and Prof. Daniel Rikli) includes a stepwise and structured explanation of the different fluoroscopic views necessary to evaluate intraoperatively with the fluoroscope different aspects of the proximal femur. The video is publically available under: (https://www.aointeract.org/#/watch/video/L3YxL3ZpZGVvcy8xOTc=/intraoperative-imaging-of-femur).

OTHERReduction algorithm

Intraoperative reduction algorithm (developed by PD Henrik Eckardt); each step in the algorithm will be checked and documented with the fluoroscope and archived using the store function of the fluoroscope.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture type 31A1 or 31A2 or subtrochanteric fracture type 31A3 * Surgeon must have completed the teaching video on how to evaluate intraoperatively the fracture, the reduction and the implant positioning and complete the reduction algorithm documenting that all intraoperative steps have been correctly accomplished

Exclusion criteria

* Patients operated without adherence to the reduction algorithm * Patients operated by surgeons who did not attend the teaching session

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shortening of the femoral neck (mm)6 months after hip surgeryRadiologic result: Shortening of the femoral neck as measured with sliding of the femoral neck screw inside the nail
Change of the shaft-neck angle (degree)6 months after hip surgeryRadiologic result: Change of the shaft-neck angle on the antero-posterior view in comparison to postoperative value
Displacement of the calcar segment in the lateral view6 months after hip surgeryRadiologic result: Displacement of the calcar segment in the lateral view
Central placement of the femoral neck screw (degree)6 months after hip surgeryRadiologic result: Central placement of the femoral neck screw as measured with the Tip-Apex-Distance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hip re-operations6 months after hip surgeryNumber of re-operations due to loss of reduction
Reduction of the calcar segment in the lateral view (mm)second postoperative dayRadiologic result: Reduction of the calcar segment in the lateral view
Mortality6 months after hip surgeryNumber of patients that have died
Operation time from incision until closure of the wound (minutes)second postoperative dayOperation time from incision until closure of the wound
Central placement of the femoral neck screw (degree)second postoperative dayRadiologic result: Central placement of the femoral neck screw as measured with the Tip-Apex-Distance

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026