Skip to content

Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dual Mobility Cup

Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dual Mobility Cup in the Treatment of Old Active Patients With Displaced Neck of Femur Fracture

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03875014
Enrollment
104
Registered
2019-03-14
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dislocations

Keywords

dual mobility cup, total hip repcament, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, dislocation

Brief summary

This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff.

Detailed description

This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff. This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted at our tertiary care level 1 trauma center .ERC approval wwill taken from Ethical Review Committee of the hospital. Patients of age group more than 60 year who underwent hip arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty or THA with dual mobility implant) between 2015 and 2017 for displaced neck of femur fracture with a complete follow up for one year were included. Both groups will be assessed for postoperative complications including surgical complications (dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and surgical site infection), one year mortality and functional outcome via Harris hip score at the latest follow up. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 20.Chi-sqaure test was used to compare categorical variables whereas independent sample T-test was used to compare continuous variables. P-value of \<0.05 was considered significant

Interventions

DEVICEsurgery with implant for hip fracture

hip replacement with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty dual mobility done and patients was followed

Sponsors

Aga Khan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* . Patients of age group more than 60 year who underwent hip arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty or THA with dual mobility implant) between 2015 and 2017 for displaced neck of femur fracture with a complete follow up for one year

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who underwent hip arthroplasty for other indications, patients younger than 60 years patient with pathological fractures, patient with missing records and patients lost to follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mortalityone yeardeath within one year of index surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
functional outcomeone yearharris hip score used to determine functional outcome

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026