Skip to content

The Effects of Minimal Shoes in Older People at Risk of Falls: The Feetback Shoe Study

Preventing Falls in Older People Using an Innovative Connected Shoe: Development & Biomechanics Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03874728
Acronym
FSS
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-03-14
Start date
2019-11-20
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2020-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Falls

Keywords

Falls, Gait, Stability, Muscle activity, Footwear, Minimal shoes, Smart shoe insoles

Brief summary

A third of people over 65, and half of people over 80, fall at least once a year. Falls are the most common cause of death from injury in the over 65s and result in a significant financial burden on the whole society. Shoes directly influence balance, gait, and the subsequent risk of slips, trips and falls by altering somatosensory feedback to the foot and ankle. Minimal shoes, that is shoes lacking a firm heel cup, a rigid sole or longitudinal arch support, have shown advantages in strengthening muscles and improving balance as compared to conventional shoes. However, limited research has studied the effect of minimal shoe in older people at risk of falls. The aim of the project will be to assess the effects of minimal shoes in older people at risk of falls, compared to conventional shoes and barefoot.

Detailed description

Study participants will attend a one-day testing session at the Movement Laboratory, University of Liverpool. Participants will be subjected to several standing and walking tests while wearing three types of footwear in a randomised order: (i) a minimal shoe, (ii) a conventional shoe, and (iii) barefoot. Participants' physical function, stability during standing and walking and an activity of lower leg muscles will be assessed in each of those three footwear conditions. Participants will also be asked about perceptions of footwear, regarding a minimal shoe and a conventional shoe. At the end of assessments, participants will be asked to complete several walking bouts while wearing a minimal shoe with smart shoe insoles, to determine smart insoles' validity in obtaining gait characteristics against a gold standard measure. Finally, those participants who volunteer to take part in a two-week follow-up study, will be asked to wear the minimal shoes with smart insoles during daily life for two weeks, After two weeks, they will be asked to fill in an online questionnaire asking them about total time they used the minimal shoes and insoles and about how satisfied they were with them.

Interventions

OTHERMinimal shoes

A minimal shoe (Vivobarefoot Ltd., London, UK) will be used.

OTHERStandardised conventional shoes

The Go Walk 4.0-Pursuit shoe for women (Skechers USA, Inc.) and the Superior 2.0-Jeveno shoe for men (Skechers USA, Inc) will be used.

Participants will conduct the assessments barefoot.

OTHERSmart shoe insoles

Arion pressure-measuring insoles (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) will be used in the study.

Sponsors

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: ≥ 60 years old * One of the vulnerability criteria for risk falls: (i) ≥ 1 self-reported falls after the age of 60; (ii) balance impairment as indicated by a score \<45 on the Berg Balance Scale, by a score \>2 on the simplified Tinetti Gait & Balance test or via any other validated and reliable clinical instrument used at the recruitment site; (iii) one or two criteria for physical frailty

Exclusion criteria

* Macro-vascular symptoms (angina, stroke or a peripheral vascular disease) * Neuromuscular diseases (Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer Disease or Parkinson Disease) * Diabetes * Use of a walking aid (cane or walker) * Ankle, knee, hip surgery ≤ 3 months * Pain in the lower extremities of ≥ 8 on the numeric rating scale

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived stabilityFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being extremely unstable and 100 mm being extremely stable
Perceived comfortFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being extremely uncomfortable and 100 mm being extremely comfortable
Perceived weightFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being extremely light and 100 mm being extremely heavy
Perceived fitFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being poorest fit possible and 100 mm being best fit possible
Perceived ease of useFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being most difficult as possible and 100 mm being as easy as imaginable
Timed Up and Go testFirst day of joining the studyTime (in seconds) to complete the Timed Up and Go test
Star Excursion Balance TestFirst day of joining the studyReach (in centimetres) to achieve during the Star Excursion Balance Test
Postural stabilityFirst day of joining the studyAnterior-Posterior and latero-medial movement (in centimetres) of the centre of pressure
Dynamic stabilityFirst day of joining the studyVariability (standard deviations) of spatio-temporal gait characteristics
Muscle activityFirst day of joining the studyElectromyography activity for selected lower leg muscles and expressed in millivolts
Perceived attractivenessFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being extremely unattractive and 100 mm being extremely attractive
Perceived attractiveness for othersFirst day of joining the studyScored on a 100-millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale with 0 mm being extremely unattractive for others and 100 mm being extremely attractive for others

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to wearing minimal shoes in daily lifeThe assessment will be performed at 2 weeksAdherence to wearing minimal shoes with smart shoe insoles assessed with an online questionnaire and expressed in total time in days and hours
Satisfaction of wearing minimal shoes in daily lifeThe assessment will be performed at 2 weeksSatisfaction of wearing minimal shoes with smart shoe insoles assessed with an online questionnaire and expressed on a 5-point Likert scale, with the following levels: 1 - Very dissatisfied, 2 - dissatisfied, 3 - unsure, 4 - satisfied, 5 - Very satisfied.
Gait characteristics during daily lifeThe assessment will be performed at 2 weeksGait characteristics, assessed with smart shoe insoles, during activities of daily life and expressed in spatio-temporal metrics
Validity of smart shoe insolesFirst day of joining the studyValidity of Arion insoles against Qualisys Motion Capture System

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026