Skip to content

Effects of Virtual Reality on Transtibial Amputation Physiotherapy Outcomes

Effects of Virtual Reality on Transtibial Amputation Ouality of Life,Performance, Balance,Prothesis Adaptation and Gait Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03872193
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-03-13
Start date
2016-07-10
Completion date
2018-06-10
Last updated
2019-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Virtual Reality

Keywords

Amputation, Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation. 20 Transtibial amputee were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed additionally standart physiotherapy, only standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation.20 transtibial amputee with 36 mean age were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed, standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking. For this purpose, SF-36 Questionnaire, 6-minute walking test, one leg rest time, Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scale, wearable biometric device and footprint method were utilized. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in pre-treatment and post-treatment performance, balance and gait parameters in the groups of individuals (p \<0.05). The quality of life pain parameter was statistically decline in the group receiving virtual reality (p\<0.05). On the other hand, significant differences in the quality of life and prosthesis adaptation of the individuals were not found between the groups (p\> 0.05). The results of this study showed that virtual reality practices and standard physiotherapy methods are effective on performance, balance and walking in transtibial amputee rehabilitation. It is thought that it will be important to perform virtual reality applications in amputee rehabilitation separately in both methods, in addition to standard physiotherapy methods, to include in rehabilitation process, to bring an ability of alternative application to professionals working in this area and to work about amputees with using different suspension systems and with different amputation levels.

Interventions

OTHERExercise

Virtual Reality Exercies

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One group only physiotherapy second group takes physiotherapy and virtual reality exercises.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* transtibial and unilateral amputation * At least 1 year prothesis usage, 18- 65 year age, * At least 15 min independent walking ability, * Stabile stump volume, * Standart stump lentgh, * Enough kognition for evaluation and tests.

Exclusion criteria

* walking and other activities to prevent; shortness of muscle, limitation of joint motion and phantom pain in stump, presence of any discomfort or systemic health problem that may affect the gait outside the amputation * presence of visual problems to prevent participation in virtual reality applications, * use of walking aids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life measured of individuals: SF-36 Scale10 minuteSF-36 Quality of Life Scale, higher values represent a better
Balance Test5 minuteSingle Leg Balance Test,higher values represent a better
Performance Test6 minute6 minute walk test,higher values represent a better
Prothesis Satisfaction: Trinity Amputation Prothesis Experience Scale5 minuteTrinity Amputation Prothesis Experience Scale; 5 point likert scale,5-75 point, activity limitation,physicosocial adaptation,prothesis satisfaction
Gait Parameters6 minuteWearable Biometric Device

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026