Skip to content

β-blockers Withdrawal in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence: Effect on Functional Capacity (Preserve-HR)

Betablockers Withdrawal in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Chronotropic Incompetence: Effect on Functional Capacity Rationale and Study Design of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03871803
Acronym
Preserve-HR
Enrollment
52
Registered
2019-03-12
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2021-02-27
Last updated
2021-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronotropic Incompetence, Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Chronotropic incompetence, Functional capacity, Quality of life

Brief summary

The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is complex and multifactorial. Chronotropic incompetence has emerged as a crucial mechanism, particularly in elderly patients. Betablockers, drugs with negative chronotropic effect, are commonly used in HFpEF, despite current evidence does not support its routine use in these patients. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of betablockers withdrawal in patients with HFpEF and chronotropic incompetence on functional capacity assessed by the peak oxygen consumption at maximal exercise (peakVO2) at 15 and 30 days after the intervention

Detailed description

This is a prospective, crossover, randomized (1:1) and single center study. After randomization, clinical and cardiac rhythm will be continuously registered during 30 days. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 15 and 30-day in both groups. Patients with HFpEF, functional class NYHA II-III, chronic treatment with betablockers, and chronotropic incompetence will be enrolled. A sample size estimation \[alfa: 0.05, power: 90%, a 15% loss rate, and delta change of mean peakVO2: +1.2 mL/kg/min (SD±2.5)\] of 52 patients would be necessary to test our hypothesis. In conclusion, optimizing therapy that improve quality of life and autonomy has become a health care priority in HFpEF. The investigators believe this study will add important knowledge for the treatment of a subgroup of HFpEF.

Interventions

DRUGControlled withdrawal of beta-blockers

Controlled withdrawal of previos doses of beta-blockers after diagnosis of chronotropic incompetence

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to evaluate the chronotropic incompetence and the primary endpoint (functional capacity)

Sponsors

Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The examination tests will be performed by two blinded cardiologist to patients' allocation group

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, crossover, randomized (1:1) and single center study. After randomization, clinical and cardiac rhythm will be continuously registered during 30 days. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by CPET at 15 and 30-day in both groups. Patients with HFpEF, functional class NYHA II-III, chronic treatment with betablockers, and chronotropic incompetence will be enrolled. A sample size estimation \[alfa: 0.05, power: 90%, a 15% loss rate, and delta change of mean peakVO2: +1.2 mL/kg/min (SD±2.5)\] of 52 patients would be necessary to test our hypothesis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable symptomatic patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (NYHA class II-III). * NT-proBNP \>125 pg/mL in the last month * Previous treatment with beta-blockers during the last 3 months * Documented chronotropic incompetence, defined as: \[(heart rate at peak exercise- heart rate at baseline)\] / \[(220 - age) - (heart rate at baseline)\] \< 0.62

Exclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe valvulopathy or miocardiopathy associated * Patient with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction * Acute Coronary Syndrome in the previous 12 months * Angina or signs of myocardial ischemia on cardiopulmonary exercise testing * Baseline heart rate\>75 bpm. * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as \>140mmHg systolic blood pressure and/or \>90 mmHg diastolic blood pressure. * Moderate to severe pulmonary disease associated * Extracardiac comorbidity with a life expentancy less than 1 year. * Unable to perform an adequate cardiopulmonary exersice test * Previous treatment with digitalis or calcium channel blockers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal functional capacityThe change in peak oxygen consumption will be measured at baseline, at 15-day and at 30-dayMaximal functional capacity measured by peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The peak oxygen consumption is expressed in mL/kg/min.The investigators will measure the change of peak oxygen consumption .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive evaluationThe change in MMSE score will be measured at baseline, at 15-day and at 30-dayWe will asses the cognitive function by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) The MMSE is a cognitive test. The score is ranged from 0-30 (units of a scale). 30 points is the better outcome. The investigators will assess the change in the score.
Quality of life evaluationThe change in MLHFQ score will be measured at baseline, at 15-day and at 30-dayWe will asses the quality of life by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a quality of life questionnarie .The investigators will asses the changes in the full questionnarie. We will report the total score. The score is ranged from 0-105. 105 points is the worse outcome
Security: reporting on potential clinical adverse outcomesDifferences in the composite of adverse events between both arms will be measured at 15-day , at 30-day and 180-dayEvaluation of adverse clinical outcomes during the study. The investigators will evaluate the composite of the following adverse events: mortality and/or readmissions due to cardiovascular reasons. The investigators will assess differences between both groups/arms

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026