Skip to content

Home-based SSP on Individuals With PWS

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Home-based SSP on Individuals With PWS

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03871751
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-03-12
Start date
2019-04-08
Completion date
2019-12-16
Last updated
2022-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prader-Willi Syndrome

Keywords

Polyvagal Theory, Social Behavior, Hyperacusis, Prosody, Auditory intervention

Brief summary

The Polyvagal Theory focuses on how function and structure changed in the vertebrate autonomic nervous system during evolution. The theory is named for the vagus, a major cranial nerve that regulates bodily state. As a function of evolution, humans and other mammals have a new vagal pathway that links the regulation of bodily state to the control of the muscles of the face and head including the middle ear muscles. These pathways regulating body state, facial gesture, listening (i.e., middle ear muscles), and vocal communication collectively function as a Social Engagement System (SES). Because the Social Engagement System is an integrated system, interventions influencing one component of this system (e.g., middle ear muscles) may impact on the other components. Individuals with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) exhibit many behaviors that are consistent with a compromised Social Engagement System. Atypical function of the Social Engagement System results in problems associated with state regulation (e.g., impulsivity, tantrums, and difficulty with change in routine), ingestion (e.g., difficulties in sucking at birth, hyperphagia), coordination of suck/swallow/breathe, intonation of vocalizations, auditory processing and hypersensitivity, and socialization. The investigatiors propose to confirm that several features of the behavioral phenotype of PWS may be explained within the context of a dysfunctional SES, which may be partially rehabilitated via an intervention designed as a 'neural exercise' of the SES (i.e., the Safe and Sound Protocol, SSP). Specific Aims: Aim I: To demonstrate the effectiveness of the Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) on improvement of social and regulation behaviors in individuals with PWS. Aim II: To evaluate a new methodology for collecting and evaluating vocal samples for analyses of prosody, one of the indices of the functioning of the SES.

Interventions

The auditory intervention will consist of listening to computer-altered acoustic stimulation, designed to modulate the frequency band of vocal music passed to the participant. The frequency characteristics of the acoustic stimulation are selected to emphasize the relative importance of specific frequencies in conveying the information embedded in human speech. Modulation of the acoustic energy within the frequencies of human voice, similar to an exaggerated vocal prosody, are hypothesized to recruit and modulate the neural regulation of the middle ear muscles and to functionally reduce sound hypersensitivities and improve auditory processing.

Sponsors

Integrated Listening Systems
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking.

Intervention model description

All participants will receive the auditory intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Child participants must meet criteria for Prader-Willi Syndrome (per parent membership in Prader-Willi Parent Support Group). 2. Child participants must be between ages 3-17 years. Parent must be 18 years or older. 3. Child participants must have normal hearing (confirmed via parental report on Qualtrics questionnaire)

Exclusion criteria

1\) Child participants who are hearing-impaired (without correction)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in sensory sensitivities at 1 weekpre-intervention (within 1 week before intervention), post-intervention (within 1 week after intervention)Brain-Body Center Sensory Scales (BBC Sensory Scales) (parental questionnaire)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in disruptive behavior at 1 weekpre-intervention (within 1 week before intervention), post-intervention (within 1 week after intervention)Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC2) (questionnaire)
Change from baseline in social behavior at 1 weekpost-intervention (within 1 week after intervention)Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) Parent Questionnaire
Change from baseline in Foundational Abilities (balance, gross & fine motor control, sensory, social/emotional, auditory/language and attention/organization and sleep) at 1 weekpre-intervention (within 1 week before intervention), post-intervention (within 1 week after intervention)Measure of Foundational Abilities (MFA) questionnaire
Change from baseline in prosody at 1 weekpre-intervention (within 1 week before intervention), post-intervention (within 1 week after intervention)Prosody assessment of recorded speech

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026