Skip to content

Injections in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome

Comparison of Facet Nerve Block Versus Intra-articular Injection in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03871192
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-03-12
Start date
2018-08-15
Completion date
2020-08-15
Last updated
2019-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facet Joint Pain, Facet Joints; Degeneration, Facet Syndrome of Lumbar Spine

Keywords

FACET JOINTS, FACET INJECTIONS, NERVE BLOCK

Brief summary

In suspected facet joints pain, it is recommended to perform nerve blocks to establish the diagnosis with positive results being and indicator of successful of most permanent treatment of facet pain by rhizolysis. Nevertheless, the usefulness of intraarticular joint injection for diagnosis and prediction of successful neurolysis have been scarcely studied. The main purpose of this trial is to compare both methods, nerve block and intra articular injection, in diagnosis and treatment of facet joints pain.

Detailed description

Facet joint pain is considered as a nonspecific cause of spinal pain with an estimated prevalence of 12-61% of the population. At present, there are no unanimous clinical criteria to achieve and accurate diagnosis and the imaging findings do not show a direct correlation with the clinical symptoms. Facet syndrome treatment is also controversial and, although most clinical guidelines recommend nerve block as a diagnostic test, followed by neurolysis as therapeutic technique, there are many detractors of this therapeutic sequence. The confusion is even greater when considering the variability of specialists who perform these techniques, the variability of methods used ranging from blind injections to injections guided by ultrasound, fluoroscopy or CT, or the amount of medication injected. The investigators have long experience in the percutaneous treatment of pain and in the use of different imaging techniques. Although the investigators objectives are multiple, the main one is to know if there are any difference in the outcome of the facet syndrome treated by intra-articular injections and the block of the medial branch of the dorsal branch of the spinal nerve. Along with the collaboration of other specialists the investigators want to address secondary objectives such as the usefulness of ultrasound and fluoroscopy in the treatment of facet syndrome and its comparison with those performed under CT guidance that is considered as the standard technique for its greater precision.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFACET JOINT UNDER CT GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under CT guidance

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNERVE BLOCK UNDER CT GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under CT guidance

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFACET JOINT UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under fluoroscopy guidance

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNERVE BLOCK UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under fluoroscopy guidance

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFACET JOINT UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under ultrasound guidance

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNERVE BLOCK UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE

injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under ultrasound guidance

Sponsors

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patients and the evaluator don't know if the injection was performed inside the joint or around the nerve

Intervention model description

the patients are randomly assigned to intraarticular injection or nerve block

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1- Lumbar facet syndrome diagnosed by the referring specialist: Rehabilitation, Traumatology or Neurosurgery 2 -Mechanical low back pain that increases with rotation and flexion-extension, without radicular irradiation. 3- failure of conservative treatment (pharmacological and physical therapy). 4-Symptoms present more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous back surgery and other ablative treatments. 2. Contraindication for the use of corticosteroid or local anesthetic. 3. Uncontrolled acute or chronic medical illness. 4. Pregnancy or lactation. 5. Presence of inflammatory arthropathy or neuropathy. 6. Wounds or skin lesions in the area. 7. Diabetes mellitus. 8. Psychiatric disorders 9. Refusal to participate in the study. 10. Demonstration by imaging techniques of other causes that could justify the symptomatology.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain (VAS score)1 yearscore from no pain (0) to maximum pain (10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry scale1 yearscore from no disability(0) to maximum disability (10)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactALBERTO MARTINEZ MARTINEZ, MD
rralbert.martinez@gmail.com+34645558225
Backup ContactAna María Del Valle Díaz De La Guardia, MD
anam.valle.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es+34958895414

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026