Skip to content

Study of Two-step Anesthesia in Intravitreal Injection

A Prospective, Randomised, Single-masked Comparison of Topical Anesthesia and Topical Combined Subconjunctival (Two-step) Anesthesia in Intravitreal Injection

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03871062
Acronym
TAIVI
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-03-12
Start date
2019-03-08
Completion date
2020-01-01
Last updated
2019-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local

Keywords

intravitreal injection, pain, anesthesia

Brief summary

A prospective, randomised, single-masked comparison of local anaesthetic approaches including topical anesthesia combined sub-conjunctival anesthesia (two-step anesthesia) for intravitreal injection #TAIVI# vs topical anesthesia

Detailed description

Purpose: Patient pain for intravitreal injection is evaluated between topical anesthesia combined sub-conjunctival anesthesia (two-step anesthesia) and topical anesthesia. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trail is conducted at Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital. Selected group of 60 patients will be randomized divided into 2 groups and underwent intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic agents and steroids. Group1 uses two-step anesthesia , whereas Group 2 uses topical anesthesia. A 5-point Visual Analogue Pain Scale is used to assess patients' pain score and surgeon's ease while operating. Any complications therefore will be made note of.

Interventions

conjunctival cul-de-sac anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride drops three times + 2% lidocaine 0.2 ml subconjunctival injection

conjunctival cul-de-sac anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride drops three times

Sponsors

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wAMD); Pathologic myopia with choroidal neovascularisation (PM-CNV); Diabetic macular edema (DME); Retinal vein occlusion with macular edema (RVO-ME); Other diseases: uveitis with macular edema or choroidal neovascularisation.

Exclusion criteria

Communication problems; Allergy to amide-type local anaesthetic agents; History of vitreoretinal surgery or orbital surgery; Orbital deformity; With episcleral adjunct surgery; Trauma; Keratitis; Conjunctivitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scoresDuring surgery5-point Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS): Grade 1: No pain or discomfort; Grade 2: mild pain or discomfort; Grade 3: moderate pain or discomfort; Grade 4: severe pain or discomfort

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgeon's easeDuring surgeryGrade 1: No discomfort; Grade 2: mild discomfort; Grade 3: moderate discomfort; Grade 4: severe discomfort

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactDong Lin
lindong_1219@126.com+86-13080707858

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026