Wound Infection; Wounds; Dehisence; Cosmesis; Home Care; Length of Hospital Stay
Conditions
Brief summary
Post-operative wound issues in abdominal surgery have a significant impact on patient outcomes. The impact of different types of wound therapy are not clear in the literature. The hypothesis of this study is that NPWT has the potential to reduce Surgical Site Infections, however no study has compared the most commonly used products against standard dressings.
Detailed description
In the era of enhanced recovery, improving modifiable peri-operative and post-operative factors is essential to better patient outcomes. Surgical site complications in the form of wound infections are a major burden to the healthcare system. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as delivered by a surgical incision management system (SIMS) is a novel approach to improve wound healing when applied to closed incisions. However, data is limited in its application to laparotomy incisions in the acute and elective care surgery setting. Surgical site infections can complicate a patient's post-operative course significantly, often necessitating a longer length of stay, antibiotic therapy, intervention for wound collections and impair patient mobility and overall recovery. In addition to this, laparotomy wound complications can possibly delay adjuvant therapy and also increases healthcare costs both as an inpatient and in the community. Despite significant measures to reduce such complications in the form of wound care bundles, changing of gloves prior to wound closure etc, surgical site complications continue to represent a huge healthcare burden. Aim; 1\. To determine if prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy confers a lower rate of Superficial Site Infection or reduces wound complications in Emergency or Elective Laparotomy wounds thereby improving post-operative patient recovery and reducing healthcare costs.
Interventions
To investigate if negative wound pressure improves wound outcome
To investigate if negative wound pressure improves wound outcome
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
3 separate treatment arms
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All patients over the age of 18 years of age undergoing a laparotomy are eligible for entry into this study. Benign and malignant conditions are eligible for inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant patients and those undergoing re-look laparotomies are to be excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| superficial site infection via southampton scoring system (higher score - worse outcome) | 5 days | seroma/haematoma/abscess formation |
| Wound Dehisence | 5 days | disruption of wound continuity |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wound healing/Cosmesis | week 6 post op | scar healing (via observer scar assesment scale - higher score wore outcome) |
| Length of hospital stay | 30 days | wound complications causing prolonged hospital stay |
| home care therapy | 30days | lenth of home care dressings |
Countries
Ireland