Skip to content

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Digital Mental Health Intervention for Teen Wildfire Survivors

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Digital Mental Health Intervention to Reduce Symptoms of Post-Disaster Traumatic Stress, Depression, and Anxiety in Teens Impacted by Wildfires: A Randomized Multiple-Baseline Single-Case Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03868761
Enrollment
7
Registered
2019-03-11
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2020-11-22
Last updated
2020-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Disaster, PTSD, Stress, Trauma

Keywords

Mobile app, Disaster, Digital Medicine, Teens

Brief summary

In October, 2017, Northern California experienced devastating and historic wildfires. Sonoma Rises is an app designed for anyone who was impacted by this event and is intended to help survivors of disaster find their new normal. This study will assess the feasibility and efficacy of a self-help post-disaster mental health intervention delivered via a mobile app with a sample of teens who are experiencing post-disaster mental health symptoms.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSonoma Rises

All participants will receive the intervention, Sonoma Rises, a mobile app designed by psychologists at the National Center for PTSD for wildfire survivors to facilitate recovery from disaster. Users can access evidence-informed tools to help cope with stress, heal from loss, prioritize self-care, connect with others, manage anger, and track their mood using validated assessments. There are also tools designed just for teens and users are linked to psychoeducation on disaster and health and other mental health resources and services.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study will be a randomized, open label non-concurrent multiple-baseline experimental study with participants acting as their own controls.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Males & females aged 13-17 years directly impacted by the 2017 wildfires having lost their home or been temporarily displaced 2. Screen positive for PTSD (Child Trauma Screening Questionnaire = 5 or higher) 3. Have regular access to a smart phone and a computer 4. Have a personal email address 5. Speak and read English fluently 6. Have parental consent

Exclusion criteria

1. A positive self-reported history of psychosis, bipolar, or schizophrenia 2. Serious self-reported physical health concerns necessitating surgery or with prognosis \<6 months 3. A positive screen for a current Substance User Disorder (CRAFFT = 2 or higher) 4. Current self-reported suicidal ideation 5. Self-reported pregnancy 6. Self-reported less than four weeks of stable prescription medication for anxiety, anti-depressant, and sleep promoting medications prior to the screening assessment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PTSD functional impairment4 monthsChild PTSD Symptom Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5; score ranges from 0-7; higher scores indicate more PTSD related functional impairment
Feasibility: intervention promotion4 monthsNet promoter score (i.e., How likely are you to recommend this to a friend? score range 0-5; lower score indicates higher likelihood of promotion)
Feasibility: engagement rate4 monthsEngagement rate (i.e., Number and average length of logins to the mobile app intervention)
PTSD Symptom Severity4 monthsChild PTSD Symptom Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5; score ranges from 0-80; higher scores indicate more PTSD symptom severity
Feasibility: intervention retention: number of treatment completers4 monthsretention (i.e., number of treatment completers)
Feasibility: intervention safety: number of adverse events4 monthssafety (i.e., number of adverse events)
Feasibility: intervention adherence: number of treatment components completed4 monthsadherence rates (i.e., number of treatment components completed)
Feasibility: intervention satisfaction/acceptability4 monthssatisfaction/acceptability (i.e., participant satisfaction with treatment how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the program?- range 0-10 - higher score indicates more satisfaction)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Externalizing symptoms4 monthsBehavior and Feelings Survey- Youth; range 0-24; higher scores indicate more externalizing symptoms (behavior problems)
Psychosocial functioning4 monthsOhio Youth Scale - Functioning Subscale; Score range 0-80; higher score indicated better functioning
Internalizing symptoms4 monthsBehavior and Feelings Survey - Youth; range 0-24; higher scores indicate more internalizing symptoms (anxiety, depression, stress)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026