Skip to content

Clinical Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant

Prospective, Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03868124
Enrollment
560
Registered
2019-03-08
Start date
2018-09-17
Completion date
2024-06-19
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

Phase III study to compare the safety and efficacy of intraocular implants containing Travoprost at two different elution rates versus Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% (Timolol) in reducing elevated intraocular pressure in subjects with open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT)

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center trial comparing the efficacy and safety of the Model G2TR-063 Travoprost Intraocular Implant and the Model G2TR-125 Travoprost Intraocular Implant to topical Timolol in subjects with OAG or OHT. The staff who record key efficacy measures and the study subjects will remain masked to study treatment.

Interventions

Provided in Arm/Group descriptions

Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)

Sponsors

Glaukos Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension * C/D ratio ≤ 0.8 * Zero to two preoperative ocular hypotensive medications

Exclusion criteria

* Active corneal inflammation or edema * Retinal disorders not associated with glaucoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative3 MonthsChange from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3. Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean IOP (Control Group vs. Each Implant Group) Through 12 Months Postoperative12 MonthsDifference in mean IOP, between each test group and the control group, for IOP measurements through the Month 12 follow-up visit

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

subjects required to undergo washout of prior IOP-lowering medication(s) if applicable and to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Implant Group 1
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with high elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops. G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
185
Implant Group 2
G2-TR intraocular implant containing Travoprost 75 mcg with low elution rate, plus postoperative placebo eye drops. G2-TR intraocular implant containing travoprost: Provided in Arm/Group descriptions
183
Control Group
Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops Sham surgery + active-comparator eye drops: Sham surgery plus postoperative active-comparator eye drops (Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution, 0.5%)
192
Total560

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event003
Overall StudyDeath112
Overall StudyExplanted210
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up112
Overall StudyOngoing in study176180183
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject401

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImplant Group 1Implant Group 2Control GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
93 Participants83 Participants99 Participants275 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
92 Participants100 Participants93 Participants285 Participants
Age, Continuous63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP24.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.21
24.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
24.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
24.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
26 Participants22 Participants20 Participants68 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants2 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
150 Participants155 Participants162 Participants467 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Armenia
17 participants16 participants17 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
168 participants167 participants175 participants510 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants88 Participants105 Participants281 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants95 Participants87 Participants279 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1851 / 1832 / 192
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 18523 / 1837 / 192
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 1854 / 1832 / 192

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative

Change from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3. Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: intent to treatment analysis set which includes all randomized subjects with analyses performed according to original treatment assignment, regardless of actual treatment received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 8AM-8.26 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 10AM-8.20 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 8AM-6.83 mmHgStandard Error 0.26
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 10AM-6.92 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 8AM-6.29 mmHgStandard Error 0.28
Implant Group 1Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 10AM-6.21 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 10AM-6.79 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 8AM-8.40 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 10AM-6.83 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 8AM-6.66 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 10AM-8.28 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Implant Group 2Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 8AM-7.20 mmHgStandard Error 0.26
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 10AM-7.08 mmHgStandard Error 0.24
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 8AM-7.17 mmHgStandard Error 0.26
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 10AM-6.76 mmHgStandard Error 0.26
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeWeek 6, 10AM-7.15 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeDay 10, 8AM-7.16 mmHgStandard Error 0.26
Control GroupChange From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months PostoperativeMonth 3, 8AM-6.82 mmHgStandard Error 0.27
Comparison: Day 10, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-1.99, -0.5]
Comparison: Month 3, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-1.88, -0.52]
Comparison: Week 6, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.76, 0.69]
Comparison: Week 6, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.37, 1.01]
Comparison: Month 3, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.59, 0.91]
Comparison: Month 3, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 2 and timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.77, 0.71]
Comparison: Day 10, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 1 vs. Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-1.84, -0.36]
Comparison: Day 10, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 1 vs. Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-1.81, -0.45]
Comparison: Week 6, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 1 vs. Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.39, 1.06]
Comparison: Week 6, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 1 vs. Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.46, 0.93]
Comparison: Month 3, 8AM Difference between Implant Group 1 and Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.23, 1.28]
Comparison: Month 3, 10AM Difference between Implant Group 1 and Timolol~Note: Multiple imputation techniques were used to account for missing data such that the sample size at each visit /timepoint was the same for purposes of statistical analyses95% CI: [-0.19, 1.29]
Secondary

Mean IOP (Control Group vs. Each Implant Group) Through 12 Months Postoperative

Difference in mean IOP, between each test group and the control group, for IOP measurements through the Month 12 follow-up visit

Time frame: 12 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026