Skip to content

Denosumab Sequential Therapy

Department of Orthopedics, National Taiwan University Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03868033
Acronym
DST
Enrollment
101
Registered
2019-03-08
Start date
2019-04-12
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Denosumab, Zoledronate, Bone mineral density

Brief summary

Denosumab is a potent anti-resorptive agent and is now widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent fracture in FREEDOM study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is reversible. After holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone resorption reaching twice baseline levels for about 6 months. How to prevent bone loss after denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when considering the compliance, persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. We want to verify if zoledronic acid could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to prevent rapid bone loss by randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the protein RANK-L, the principal regulator of osteoclast development. Thus, it acts as a potent anti-resorptive agent and is now widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Because it's easily to be used with very low risk of complications, patient has better compliance and persistence of denosumab than bisphosphonates. It's market share increasing very rapidly in Taiwan. Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent fracture in FREEDOM study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is reversible. After holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone resorption reaching twice baseline levels for about 6 months. Over the first 12 months off therapy, all the bone density gained on treatment is lost4. According to previous meta-analysis study, although the persistence of denosumab therapy is better than bisphosphonates, only 62% patients keep the treatment after two years. We could image how low the persistence is after five-year or ten-year treatment in the real world. How to prevent bone loss after denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when considering the compliance, persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. There is only one randomized controlled trial dealing with this problem, although the primary goal of the study is designed to compare the compliance and persistence1. After switching from denosumab to alendronate for one year, bone mineral density does not decrease rapidly, although there is mild elevation of bone turn over marker. We want to verify if zoledronic acid could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to prevent rapid bone loss by randomized clinical trial.

Interventions

DRUGZoledronic Acid

Use Zoledronic acid as a sequential therapy after denosumab treatment for more than 2 years

DRUGDenosumab

Continuous Denosumab treatment in arm 1 for two years or as a 2nd year treatment in arm 2 for one year

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Postmenopausal women 2. Men \>50-year-old 3. After Denosumab treatment ≥ 2 years due to osteoporosis

Exclusion criteria

1. Patientshadeverusedantiosteoporosismedications other than Dmab 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<35 ml/min. 3. Malignancy 4. Continuous steroid treatment, hormone therapy or other medical treatment affecting bone metabolism 5. Secondary osteoporosis 6. Metabolic bone diseases 7. Contraindications to ZOL 8. Patients older than 80 years old 9. Hypocalcemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck bone mineral densitybaseline, 1 year, 2 yearChanges of lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck bone mineral density from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of bone turnover markerbaseline, 6 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChanges of bone turnover marker, including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and propeptide of procollagen type I (P1NP)
Clinical osteoporotic fracturebaseline, 1 year, 2 yearIncidence of clinical osteoporotic fracture

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026