Osteoporosis
Conditions
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Denosumab, Zoledronate, Bone mineral density
Brief summary
Denosumab is a potent anti-resorptive agent and is now widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent fracture in FREEDOM study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is reversible. After holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone resorption reaching twice baseline levels for about 6 months. How to prevent bone loss after denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when considering the compliance, persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. We want to verify if zoledronic acid could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to prevent rapid bone loss by randomized clinical trial.
Detailed description
Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the protein RANK-L, the principal regulator of osteoclast development. Thus, it acts as a potent anti-resorptive agent and is now widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Because it's easily to be used with very low risk of complications, patient has better compliance and persistence of denosumab than bisphosphonates. It's market share increasing very rapidly in Taiwan. Although denosumab has excellent effect to increase bone mass and prevent fracture in FREEDOM study with very low complications, even up to ten years, it's effect is reversible. After holding the drug, circulating denosumab levels fall rapidly, and bone resorption reaching twice baseline levels for about 6 months. Over the first 12 months off therapy, all the bone density gained on treatment is lost4. According to previous meta-analysis study, although the persistence of denosumab therapy is better than bisphosphonates, only 62% patients keep the treatment after two years. We could image how low the persistence is after five-year or ten-year treatment in the real world. How to prevent bone loss after denosumab therapy is an important issue, especially when considering the compliance, persistence, or other comorbidities of the patient. There is only one randomized controlled trial dealing with this problem, although the primary goal of the study is designed to compare the compliance and persistence1. After switching from denosumab to alendronate for one year, bone mineral density does not decrease rapidly, although there is mild elevation of bone turn over marker. We want to verify if zoledronic acid could be used as a sequential therapy after denosumab to prevent rapid bone loss by randomized clinical trial.
Interventions
Use Zoledronic acid as a sequential therapy after denosumab treatment for more than 2 years
Continuous Denosumab treatment in arm 1 for two years or as a 2nd year treatment in arm 2 for one year
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Postmenopausal women 2. Men \>50-year-old 3. After Denosumab treatment ≥ 2 years due to osteoporosis
Exclusion criteria
1. Patientshadeverusedantiosteoporosismedications other than Dmab 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<35 ml/min. 3. Malignancy 4. Continuous steroid treatment, hormone therapy or other medical treatment affecting bone metabolism 5. Secondary osteoporosis 6. Metabolic bone diseases 7. Contraindications to ZOL 8. Patients older than 80 years old 9. Hypocalcemia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes of lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck bone mineral density | baseline, 1 year, 2 year | Changes of lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck bone mineral density from baseline |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of bone turnover marker | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 24 months | Changes of bone turnover marker, including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and propeptide of procollagen type I (P1NP) |
| Clinical osteoporotic fracture | baseline, 1 year, 2 year | Incidence of clinical osteoporotic fracture |
Countries
Taiwan