Skip to content

Effects of a Compliant Arm Support on Post-stroke Upper Extremity Range of Motion

Effects of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assistance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03867838
Enrollment
6
Registered
2019-03-08
Start date
2019-06-14
Completion date
2020-10-01
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to show that a wearable compliant arm support consisting of inflatable bladders with adjustable straps to connect them to the waist and arm can meaningfully increase the reachable workspace of persons with post-stroke arm weakness.

Interventions

DEVICEcompliant support

Participants will be given compliant arm support and their reachable workspace measured

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* greater than 6 months post-stroke * passive abduction to 90 degrees at shoulder * reduced active (retro)flexion/extension at shoulder when abducted to 90 degrees * reduced active flexion/extension at elbow

Exclusion criteria

* unable to give informed consent * unable to comprehend and follow instructions * have a condition (other than stroke) affecting sensorimotor function * show evidence of unilateral spatial neglect * unable to sit in a chair without armrests for 2 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Reachable Workspacebaseline, while using support device, and 30 minutes following removal of support device (up to 4 minutes per assessment)Reachable workspace was measured using a PhaseSpace motion capture system, recorded as an area (in square meters).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Biceps Activationbaseline and while using support device (up to 10 seconds per assessment)Biceps activation measured using surface electromyography during an isometric hold to approximate the contributions of erroneous flexor synergies.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were screened to include only those whose most recent stroke occurred more than 6 months before the study date and to exclude those with conflating health problems, sensory deficits, or that experience pain during passive movements of the arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Stroke survivors with upper extremity motor impairments
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Biceps activation0.19 mV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
Correct scapulohumeral rhythm6 Participants
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Reachable workspace0.10 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Spatial neglect0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Reachable Workspace

Reachable workspace was measured using a PhaseSpace motion capture system, recorded as an area (in square meters).

Time frame: baseline, while using support device, and 30 minutes following removal of support device (up to 4 minutes per assessment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsPercent Change From Baseline in Reachable WorkspaceOn support device27 percent changeStandard Deviation 84
All ParticipantsPercent Change From Baseline in Reachable WorkspacePost support device-71 percent changeStandard Deviation 41
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Biceps Activation

Biceps activation measured using surface electromyography during an isometric hold to approximate the contributions of erroneous flexor synergies.

Time frame: baseline and while using support device (up to 10 seconds per assessment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsPercent Change From Baseline in Biceps Activation-16 percent changeStandard Deviation 71

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026