Skip to content

Prebiotic GOS and Lactoferrin With Iron Supplements

Prebiotic GOS and Lactoferrin for Beneficial Gut Microbiota With Iron Supplements

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03866837
Enrollment
288
Registered
2019-03-07
Start date
2020-01-15
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iron-deficiency

Keywords

Clinical trial, Microbiome, PolyFermS, Polyfermenter intestinal model, Iron-deficiency, Iron supplementation, Galacto-oligosaccharides, Lactoferrin, Ferrous fumarate

Brief summary

The ultimate goal of this research is to develop a means to safely administer iron supplements to infants in settings with a high infection burden. The investigators will conduct a randomized clinical trial in 6 month-old Kenyan infants in conjunction with mechanistic microbiota studies using a novel long-term continuous polyfermenter platform inoculated with immobilized fecal microbiota from Kenyan infants. Oral iron supplements are associated with a significant 15% increase in the rate of diarrhea in children in malaria-endemic areas. The most recent studies have shown that prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) can provide partial amelioration of the adverse effects of iron supplementation by enhancing the growth of barrier populations of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. The investigators hypothesize that the combination of GOS with bovine lactoferrin, adding iron sequestration as well as antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, will provide almost complete protection against the adverse effects of added iron on the intestinal microbiota.

Detailed description

Iron deficiency, the principal cause of anemia globally, affects more than two billion individuals, predominantly infants, children and women of childbearing age. Iron deficiency impairs cognitive and behavioral development in childhood, compromises immune responsiveness, decreases physical performance, and when severe, increases mortality among infants, children and pregnant women. Effective prevention and treatment of iron deficiency uses iron supplements or fortificants to increase oral iron intake. Generally, only a small fraction of the added iron is absorbed in the upper small intestine, with 80% or more passing into the colon. Because iron is an essential micronutrient for growth, proliferation, and persistence for most intestinal microbes, the increase in iron availability has profound effects on the composition and metabolism of intestinal microbiota. In particular, iron is a prime determinant of colonization and virulence for most enteric gram-negative bacteria, includingmSalmonella, Shigella and pathogenic Escherichia coli. Commensal intestinal microorganisms, principally of the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, require little or no iron, provide a barrier effect and can inhibit pathogen growth by a variety of methods, including sequestration of iron, competition for nutrients and for intestinal epithelial sites stabilization of intestinal barrier function, and production of antibacterial peptides and organic acids that lower the pH. Increases in unabsorbed iron can promote the growth of virulent enteropathogens that overwhelm barrier strains and disrupt the gut microbiota. We hypothesize that the combination of prebiotic GOS with bovine lactoferrin (bLF), adding iron sequestration, antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, will provide virtually complete protection against the adverse effects of added iron on the intestinal microbiota. Our research has two specific aims: 1. to conduct a randomized, controlled double-blind 9-month clinical trial in 6-month old Kenyan infants comparing the effects on gut microbiome composition among groups receiving in-home fortification for 6 months with micronutrient powders containing 5 mg iron (as sodium iron EDTA \[2.5 mg\] and ferrous fumarate \[2.5 mg\]) and (i) galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS; 7.5 g), (ii) bovine lactoferrin (bLF, 1.0 g), (iii) GOS (7.5 g) and bLF (1.0 g), and (iv) no GOS or bLF. Each infant will then be followed for an additional 3 months to determine the longer-term effects of the treatments. 2. to examine mechanisms of iron, prebiotic GOS and iron-sequestering bLF on microbiota composition, enteropathogen development, microbiota functions and metabolic activity, and inflammatory potential in vitro with treatments paralleling those in Specific Aim 1, using immobilized fecal microbiota from Kenyan infants to inoculate our established long-term continuous polyfermenter intestinal model (PolyFermS) to mimic Kenyan infant colon conditions, together with cellular studies. Combining in vivo clinical and in vitro approaches will help guide formulation of safer iron supplements and fortificants and improve our understanding of the mechanisms whereby prebiotic GOS and iron-sequestering bLF support commensal microbiota to prevent iron-induced overgrowth by opportunistic enteropathogens.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTGalacto-oligosaccharides

Galacto-oligosaccharides are classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, are components of cow's milk and have been used repeatedly in clinical trials without adverse effects.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBovine lactoferrin

Bovine lactoferrin is classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, is a component of cow's milk and has been used repeatedly in clinical trials without adverse effects.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTMultiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron

The multiple micronutrient powders are composed of Vitamin A, 400 μg; Vitamin D, 5 μg; Tocopherol Equivalents, 5 mg; Thiamine, 0.5 mg; Riboflavin, 0.5 mg; Vitamin B6, 0.5 mg; Folic Acid, 90 μg; Niacin, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.9 μg; Vitamin C, 30 mg; Copper, 0.56 mg; Iodine, 90 μg; Selenium, 17 μg; Zinc, 4.1 mg; Phytase, 190 FTU; Iron, 5 mg \[(as Ferrous fumarate, 2.5 mg and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), 2.5 mg\].

Sponsors

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Stratified randomization will be carried out by the Trial Statistician using computer-generated randomly permuted blocks of size 2, 4 or 6 with stratification by gender and assignment of eligible infants to one of the 4 intervention groups using 4 color codes. Allocation will be known solely by the Trial Statistician and the Clinical Trial Safety Officer and concealed from all other study personnel.

Intervention model description

The study is a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, 9-month clinical trial with a 2X2 factorial design to determine the efficacy of galacto-oligosaccharides and bovine lactoferrin in preserving a beneficial gut microbiota during iron supplementation in Kenyan infants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Weeks to 27 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* vaginal or cesarean delivery * an infant age of 6 months (±3 weeks) * mother ≥15 years of age * infant still breastfeeding * anticipated residence in the area for the study duration.

Exclusion criteria

* inability to provide informed consent * hemoglobin \< 70 g/L * Z scores for weight-for-age (WAZ) or weight-for-height (WHZ) \<3, * any maternal or infant chronic illness * administration of any infant vitamin or mineral supplements for the past 2 months * history of infant antibiotic treatment within 7 days before study enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month1 monthThe primary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 1 month.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months9 monthsA key secondary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 9 months.
Microbiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).1, 6 and 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the microbiota composition among study groups as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) measures of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) and of beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera at 1, 6, and 9 months. This outcome is reported as the mean log10 fold change from the beneficial to harmful bacteria ratio (BHR) of the baseline microbiota composition, abbreviated as log10 FC in BHR.
Number of Participants Who Experienced DiarrheaUp to 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of diarrhea among study groups.
Number of Participants Who Experienced MalariaUp to 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of malaria among study groups.
Proportion of Participants Who Experienced AnemiaBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with anemia among study groups, defined as Hemoglobin \< 11.5 g/L by laboratory diagnosis.
Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months6 monthsA key secondary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 6 months.
Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with iron deficiency anemia among study groups, defined as Hemoglobin \< 11.5 g/L and Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) \> 8.3 mg/L
Proportion of Participants Who Experienced InflammationBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with inflammation among study groups, defined as C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 5 mg/L
Number of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract InfectionsUp to 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of Respiratory tract infections among study groups.
Other IllnessesUp to 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of other illnesses among study groups.
Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron DeficiencyBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 monthsA secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with iron deficiency among study groups, defined as plasma Ferritin \< 12 µg/L or/and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) \> 8.3 mg/L

Countries

Kenya, Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOS
This study group received daily in-home fortification for 6 months with multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron (as sodium iron EDTA \[2.5 mg\] and ferrous fumarate \[2.5 mg\]) and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), 7.5 mg. Multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron: The multiple micronutrient powders are composed of Vitamin A, 400 μg; Vitamin D, 5 μg; Tocopherol Equivalents, 5 mg; Thiamine, 0.5 mg; Riboflavin, 0.5 mg; Vitamin B6, 0.5 mg; Folic Acid, 90 μg; Niacin, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.9 μg; Vitamin C, 30 mg; Copper, 0.56 mg; Iodine, 90 μg; Selenium, 17 μg; Zinc, 4.1 mg; Phytase, 190 FTU; Iron, 5 mg \[(as Ferrous fumarate, 2.5 mg and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), 2.5 mg\].
72
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLF
This study group received daily in-home fortification for 6 months with multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron (as sodium iron EDTA \[2.5 mg\] and ferrous fumarate \[2.5 mg\]), bovine lactoferrin (bLF), 1.0 g. Multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron: The multiple micronutrient powders are composed of Vitamin A, 400 μg; Vitamin D, 5 μg; Tocopherol Equivalents, 5 mg; Thiamine, 0.5 mg; Riboflavin, 0.5 mg; Vitamin B6, 0.5 mg; Folic Acid, 90 μg; Niacin, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.9 μg; Vitamin C, 30 mg; Copper, 0.56 mg; Iodine, 90 μg; Selenium, 17 μg; Zinc, 4.1 mg; Phytase, 190 FTU; Iron, 5 mg \[(as Ferrous fumarate, 2.5 mg and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), 2.5 mg\].
72
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLF
This study group received daily in-home fortification for 6 months with multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron (as sodium iron EDTA \[2.5 mg\] and ferrous fumarate \[2.5 mg\]), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), 7.5 mg, and bovine lactoferrin (bLF), 1.0 g. Multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron: The multiple micronutrient powders are composed of Vitamin A, 400 μg; Vitamin D, 5 μg; Tocopherol Equivalents, 5 mg; Thiamine, 0.5 mg; Riboflavin, 0.5 mg; Vitamin B6, 0.5 mg; Folic Acid, 90 μg; Niacin, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.9 μg; Vitamin C, 30 mg; Copper, 0.56 mg; Iodine, 90 μg; Selenium, 17 μg; Zinc, 4.1 mg; Phytase, 190 FTU; Iron, 5 mg \[(as Ferrous fumarate, 2.5 mg and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), 2.5 mg\].
72
Study Group D: MMP + Iron
This study group received daily in-home fortification for 6 months with multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron (as sodium iron EDTA \[2.5 mg\] and ferrous fumarate \[2.5 mg\]) alone, with no galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), and no bovine lactoferrin (bLF). Multiple micronutrient powders with 5 mg iron: The multiple micronutrient powders are composed of Vitamin A, 400 μg; Vitamin D, 5 μg; Tocopherol Equivalents, 5 mg; Thiamine, 0.5 mg; Riboflavin, 0.5 mg; Vitamin B6, 0.5 mg; Folic Acid, 90 μg; Niacin, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.9 μg; Vitamin C, 30 mg; Copper, 0.56 mg; Iodine, 90 μg; Selenium, 17 μg; Zinc, 4.1 mg; Phytase, 190 FTU; Iron, 5 mg \[(as Ferrous fumarate, 2.5 mg and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA), 2.5 mg\].
72
Total288

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSStudy Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFStudy Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFStudy Group D: MMP + IronTotal
Age, Continuous6.07 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42
6.17 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
6.15 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.37
6.27 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35
6.11 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
log(10) Beneficial to Harmful Bacteria Ratio2.279 log(10) ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.338
2.553 log(10) ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.663
2.070 log(10) ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.565
1.956 log(10) ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.597
2.215 log(10) ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.582
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
72 participants72 participants72 participants72 participants288 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants36 Participants36 Participants36 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants36 Participants36 Participants36 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 720 / 720 / 721 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 7255 / 7259 / 7265 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 721 / 720 / 721 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month

The primary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 1 month.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month2.208 (unitless)Standard Error 0.202
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month1.530 (unitless)Standard Error 0.207
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month2.075 (unitless)Standard Error 0.22
Study Group D: MMP + IronRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 1 Month1.292 (unitless)Standard Error 0.176
Secondary

Microbiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).

A secondary outcome measure will be the microbiota composition among study groups as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) measures of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) and of beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera at 1, 6, and 9 months. This outcome is reported as the mean log10 fold change from the beneficial to harmful bacteria ratio (BHR) of the baseline microbiota composition, abbreviated as log10 FC in BHR.

Time frame: 1, 6 and 9 months

Population: 8 participants in Group A, 6 participants in Group B, 7 participants in Group C, and 7 participants in Group D withdrew during the duration of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).6 months-0.742 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.247
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).9 months-0.269 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.29
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).1 month-0.022 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.258
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).1 month-1.025 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.239
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).6 months-0.786 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.291
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).9 months-0.607 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.314
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).9 months-0.174 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.351
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).6 months-0.308 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.306
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).1 month-0.002 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.314
Study Group D: MMP + IronMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).6 months-0.241 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.284
Study Group D: MMP + IronMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).9 months-0.114 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.284
Study Group D: MMP + IronMicrobiota Composition as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).1 month-0.637 log 10 (fold change)Standard Error 0.239
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Diarrhea

A secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of diarrhea among study groups.

Time frame: Up to 9 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSNumber of Participants Who Experienced Diarrhea7 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Diarrhea6 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Diarrhea7 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronNumber of Participants Who Experienced Diarrhea4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Malaria

A secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of malaria among study groups.

Time frame: Up to 9 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSNumber of Participants Who Experienced Malaria7 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Malaria4 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Malaria3 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronNumber of Participants Who Experienced Malaria3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract Infections

A secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of Respiratory tract infections among study groups.

Time frame: Up to 9 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSNumber of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract Infections40 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract Infections36 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFNumber of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract Infections41 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronNumber of Participants Who Experienced Respiratory Tract Infections38 Participants
Secondary

Other Illnesses

A secondary outcome measure will be the prevalence of other illnesses among study groups.

Time frame: Up to 9 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesGastroenteritis1 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesGastritis3 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesDermatitis3 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesTinea capitis4 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesFolliculitis2 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesScabies4 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesRhinitis7 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesPneumonia12 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesSkin infection2 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesCold16 Participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSOther IllnessesImpetigo3 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesGastroenteritis3 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesImpetigo4 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesPneumonia3 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesCold10 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesDermatitis5 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesFolliculitis1 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesGastritis0 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesRhinitis4 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesScabies6 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesSkin infection5 Participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFOther IllnessesTinea capitis3 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesGastritis7 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesScabies6 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesCold17 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesGastroenteritis5 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesTinea capitis1 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesRhinitis3 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesDermatitis2 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesSkin infection2 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesFolliculitis3 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesPneumonia6 Participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFOther IllnessesImpetigo2 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesCold28 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesGastritis8 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesPneumonia8 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesImpetigo5 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesRhinitis5 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesTinea capitis1 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesScabies3 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesGastroenteritis5 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesDermatitis2 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesFolliculitis4 Participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronOther IllnessesSkin infection3 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia

A secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with anemia among study groups, defined as Hemoglobin \< 11.5 g/L by laboratory diagnosis.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 months

Population: 8 participants in Group A, 6 participants in Group B, 7 participants in Group C, and 7 participants in Group D withdrew during the duration of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced AnemiaBaseline0.43 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia1 month0.43 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia6 months0.35 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia9 months0.36 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia1 month0.49 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia6 months0.33 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia9 months0.45 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced AnemiaBaseline0.54 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia6 months0.31 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia1 month0.57 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia9 months0.31 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced AnemiaBaseline0.61 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia9 months0.23 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia1 month0.56 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced AnemiaBaseline0.49 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Anemia6 months0.31 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation

A secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with inflammation among study groups, defined as C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 5 mg/L

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 months

Population: 8 participants in Group A, 6 participants in Group B, 7 participants in Group C, and 7 participants in Group D withdrew during the duration of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced InflammationBaseline0.09 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation1 month0.12 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation6 months0.18 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation9 months0.13 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation1 month0.11 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation6 months0.17 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation9 months0.20 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced InflammationBaseline0.15 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation6 months0.20 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation1 month0.13 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation9 months0.18 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced InflammationBaseline0.15 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation9 months0.18 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation1 month0.14 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced InflammationBaseline0.14 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Inflammation6 months0.18 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency

A secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with iron deficiency among study groups, defined as plasma Ferritin \< 12 µg/L or/and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) \> 8.3 mg/L

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 months

Population: 8 participants in Group A, 6 participants in Group B, 7 participants in Group C, and 7 participants in Group D withdrew during the duration of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency9 months0.65 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron DeficiencyBaseline0.66 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency1 month0.3 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency6 months0.65 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency1 month0.3 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency6 months0.68 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron DeficiencyBaseline0.61 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency9 months0.73 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency6 months0.60 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron DeficiencyBaseline0.61 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency1 month0.39 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency9 months0.66 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency6 months0.60 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency9 months0.63 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron DeficiencyBaseline0.58 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency1 month0.37 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)

A secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with iron deficiency anemia among study groups, defined as Hemoglobin \< 11.5 g/L and Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) \> 8.3 mg/L

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 9 months

Population: 8 participants in Group A, 6 participants in Group B, 7 participants in Group C, and 7 participants in Group D withdrew during the duration of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)1 month0.59 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)Baseline0.34 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)6 months0.29 Proportion of participants
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)9 months0.29 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)1 month0.58 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)6 months0.30 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)9 months0.39 Proportion of participants
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)Baseline0.39 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)6 months0.22 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)1 month0.6 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)9 months0.22 Proportion of participants
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)Baseline0.45 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)9 months0.22 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)1 month0.59 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)Baseline0.39 Proportion of participants
Study Group D: MMP + IronProportion of Participants Who Experienced Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)6 months0.26 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months

A key secondary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 6 months.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months1.575 (unitless)Standard Error 0.169
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months1.699 (unitless)Standard Error 0.205
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months1.779 (unitless)Standard Error 0.215
Study Group D: MMP + IronRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 6 Months1.646 (unitless)Standard Error 0.2
Secondary

Ratio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months

A key secondary outcome measure will be the ratio of the abundances of potentially harmful (enteropathogenic and/or enterotoxigenic E. coli, C. difficile, members of the C. perfringens group, B. cereus, S. aureus, sum of Shigella spp., and Salmonella) to beneficial (bifidobacteria and the group of Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.) bacterial genera in fecal microbiota as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at 9 months.

Time frame: 9 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study Group A: MMP + Iron + GOSRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months2.084 (unitless)Standard Error 0.192
Study Group B: MMP + Iron + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months1.881 (unitless)Standard Error 0.183
Study Group C: MMP + Iron + GOS + bLFRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months1.916 (unitless)Standard Error 0.257
Study Group D: MMP + IronRatio of Harmful to Beneficial Bacterial Genera in Fecal Microbiota as Determined by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at 9 Months1.748 (unitless)Standard Error 0.201

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026