Diabetic Macular Edema
Conditions
Brief summary
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of photobiomodulation compared with sham on central subfield thickness (CST) in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision.
Detailed description
This study is being conducted to assess the effects of photobiomodulation on CST compared with sham in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision. Photobiomodulation is irradiation by light in the 630-900 nanometer region of the spectrum. Furthermore, this pilot study is being conducted to determine whether the conduct of a pivotal trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome and provide information on outcome measures needed to design a pivotal trial.
Interventions
670nm wavelength light
Broad spectrum light device
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Optical coherence tomography technicians and visual acuity testers, including refractionists, will be masked to treatment group at outcome visits. Study participants will be masked to their treatment group assignment. Every effort will be made to keep investigators masked. Study coordinators who will be involved with training and compliance assessment will not be masked to treatment group
Intervention model description
Random assignment (1:1) to photobiomodulation (PBM) or sham
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present: 1. Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes. 2. Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes. 3. Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or the World Health Organization criteria. 4. Able and willing to provide informed consent. Atleast one eye meeting the following criteria: 1. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 79 (i.e., 20/25 or better) 2. Ophthalmoscopic evidence of central-involved DME, confirmed by CST on spectral domain OCT: Zeiss Cirrus: ≥290µm in women, and ≥305µm in men, Heidelberg Spectralis: ≥305µm in women, and ≥320µm in men 3. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant
Exclusion criteria
* History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. * A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status that might preclude completion of follow-up). * Initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months. * Participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment within 30 days of randomization with any drug/device that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied. Note: study participants cannot participant in another investigational trial that involves treatment with an investigational drug or device while participating in the study. * Systolic blood pressure above 180 or diastolic blood pressure above 110. If blood pressure is brought below 180 systolic and 110 diastolic by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible. * Systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization. These drugs should not be used during the study. * For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or intending to become pregnant within the next 8 months. Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed. * Individual is expecting to move out of the area during the 8 months of the study. A participant will be excluded if the study eye meets any of the following criteria: * Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than DME. An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or investigator assessment of OCT suggests that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are contributing to the macular edema. * An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, any visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition). * An ocular condition is present (other than DME) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect visual acuity during the course of the study or require intraocular treatment (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.) * Cataract is present that, in the opinion of the investigator, may alter visual acuity during the course of the study. * History of major ocular surgery (including cataract, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated during the study period. * Any history of prior laser or other surgical, intravitreal, or peribulbar treatment for DME or DR (such as panretinal photocoagulation, focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, or anti-VEGF) within the prior 12 months. If treatment was given more than 12 months prior, no more than 4 prior intraocular injections. Enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 15 percent of the planned sample size with any history of anti-VEGF treatment and a maximum of 15% with any history of PRP. * Anticipated need to treat DME or DR during the study period * History of topical steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment within 30 days prior to randomization. * History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization * Any history of vitrectomy. * Aphakia * Uncontrolled glaucoma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 4 Months | Baseline to 4 months | Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N=3 \[PBM\]; N = 1 \[placebo\]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific. OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 5 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change in Retinal Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 4 Months | Baseline to 4 months | CST = central subfield thickness, OCT = optical coherence tomography, PBM = photobiomodulation |
| Number of Eyes With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography at 4 Months | baseline to 4 months | DME = diabetic macular edema, OCT = optical coherence tomography |
| Number of Eyes Receiving Alternative Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema | 4 months | — |
| Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 4 Months | baseline to 4 months | Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40, the legal unrestricted driving limit in most states. A 5-letter change for an individual is approximately equal to a 1-line change on a vision chart. Visual acuity (VA) change truncated to mean ±3 SD (-0.3 ± 3 × 5.3). Eyes that received alternative treatment for DME before primary outcome visit (3 PBM, 1 placebo); last measurements taken before DME treatment was initiated were the pre-specified outcome data. Missing data for eyes that didn't get alternative treatment for DME imputed with multiple imputation. |
| Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From 4 to 8 Months | 4 to 8 months | Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of OCT data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N = 3 \[PBM\]; N = 1 \[placebo\]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative DME treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific. OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 58) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Visit completion at 4 months was prespecified as completion of any study visit from 12 to 24 weeks but due to the COVID19 pandemic, the window was extended to 32 weeks and participants in Phase 2 could also discontinue device use.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) 670nm wavelength device twice a day for 90 seconds through 4 months. At the 4-month visit, participants who have not already received alternative treatments for DME will return the original device and receive the alternative treatment group device (i.e. the sham group will receive an active treatment device and the active treatment group will receive a sham device).
Retilux: 670nm wavelength light | 69 |
| Placebo Broad spectrum light device twice a day for 90 seconds through 4 months. At the 4-month visit, participants who have not already received alternative treatments for DME will return the original device and receive the alternative treatment group device (i.e. the sham group will receive an active treatment device and the active treatment group will receive a sham device)
Sham Light Device: Broad spectrum light device | 66 |
| Total | 135 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Phase 2 | Completed the study by receiving alternate treatment for diabetic macular edema | 1 | 0 |
| Phase 2 | Death | 0 | 2 |
| Phase 2 | Dropped | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | 63 years | 62 years | 62 years |
| Atleast one prior treatment for diabetic macular edema | 15 participants | 12 participants | 27 participants |
| Diabetes Type Type 1 | 5 participants | 10 participants | 15 participants |
| Diabetes Type Type 2 | 64 participants | 56 participants | 120 participants |
| Diabetic retinopathy severity Microaneurysms only | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Diabetic retinopathy severity Mild/moderate NPDR | 58 participants | 48 participants | 106 participants |
| Diabetic retinopathy severity Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or prior scatter laser or both. | 4 participants | 6 participants | 10 participants |
| Diabetic retinopathy severity Severe NPDR | 7 participants | 11 participants | 18 participants |
| E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score | 84.0 units on a scale | 85.0 units on a scale | 84 units on a scale |
| Hemoglobin A1c 7.5% or more | 34 participants | 41 participants | 75 participants |
| Hemoglobin A1c Less than 7.5% | 33 participants | 23 participants | 56 participants |
| Iris color Blue | 19 Eyes | 28 Eyes | 47 Eyes |
| Iris color Brown | 31 Eyes | 27 Eyes | 58 Eyes |
| Iris color Other | 19 Eyes | 11 Eyes | 30 Eyes |
| Lens Status on Clinical Exam Phakic (natural lens) | 19 participants | 15 participants | 34 participants |
| Lens Status on Clinical Exam Prosthetic intraocular lens | 50 participants | 51 participants | 101 participants |
| Optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness | 352 Microns | 355 Microns | 354 Microns |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black/African American | 4 participants | 7 participants | 11 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 5 participants | 7 participants | 12 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 59 participants | 52 participants | 111 participants |
| Retinal Volume | 7.72 mm^3 | 7.68 mm^3 | 7.70 mm^3 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 22 Participants | 28 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 47 Participants | 38 Participants | 85 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 69 | 0 / 66 | 0 / 61 | 2 / 62 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 69 | 7 / 66 | 8 / 61 | 6 / 62 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 69 | 9 / 66 | 4 / 61 | 1 / 62 |
Outcome results
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 4 Months
Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N=3 \[PBM\]; N = 1 \[placebo\]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific. OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 5
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 4 Months | 13 microns | Standard Deviation 53 |
| Placebo | Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 4 Months | 15 microns | Standard Deviation 57 |
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From 4 to 8 Months
Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of OCT data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N = 3 \[PBM\]; N = 1 \[placebo\]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative DME treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific. OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 58)
Time frame: 4 to 8 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From 4 to 8 Months | -1 microns | Standard Deviation 44 |
| Placebo | Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From 4 to 8 Months | -2 microns | Standard Deviation 41 |
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 4 Months
Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40, the legal unrestricted driving limit in most states. A 5-letter change for an individual is approximately equal to a 1-line change on a vision chart. Visual acuity (VA) change truncated to mean ±3 SD (-0.3 ± 3 × 5.3). Eyes that received alternative treatment for DME before primary outcome visit (3 PBM, 1 placebo); last measurements taken before DME treatment was initiated were the pre-specified outcome data. Missing data for eyes that didn't get alternative treatment for DME imputed with multiple imputation.
Time frame: baseline to 4 months
Population: Multiple imputation (m=100) used for missing values of VA change, with imputation models that were stratified by treatment and included variables for baseline VA, change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 4 Months | -0.2 Letter Score | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Placebo | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 4 Months | -0.6 Letter Score | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
Mean Change in Retinal Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 4 Months
CST = central subfield thickness, OCT = optical coherence tomography, PBM = photobiomodulation
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Population: Multiple imputation (m=100) was used for missing values of CST and retinal volume change, with imputation models that were stratified by treatment and included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. OCT retinal volume change was missing for 8 PBM and 5 placebo eyes.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Mean Change in Retinal Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 4 Months | 0.12 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Placebo | Mean Change in Retinal Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 4 Months | 0.10 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Number of Eyes Receiving Alternative Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Time frame: 4 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Number of Eyes Receiving Alternative Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema | 3 Eyes |
| Placebo | Number of Eyes Receiving Alternative Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema | 1 Eyes |
Number of Eyes With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography at 4 Months
DME = diabetic macular edema, OCT = optical coherence tomography
Time frame: baseline to 4 months
Population: Eyes that received alternate DME treatment (N = 3 (Photobiomodulation); N = 1 (Placebo)) used the last OCT measurement prior to receiving treatment. Missing values were not imputed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Photobiomodulation (PBM) | Number of Eyes With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography at 4 Months | 61 Eyes |
| Placebo | Number of Eyes With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography at 4 Months | 57 Eyes |