Skip to content

The Effectiveness of a Stress Incontinence Care Protocol

The Effectiveness of a Care Protocol Developed Using the Star Model on Female Patients With Stress Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03866356
Acronym
SICP
Enrollment
68
Registered
2019-03-07
Start date
2016-12-01
Completion date
2018-01-15
Last updated
2019-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nursing, Stress Incontinence, Female

Keywords

Nursing, evidence-based practice, Star model, stress incontinence, nursing care protocol, female

Brief summary

This study seeks to contribute to nursing practices by developing and stress incontinence care protocol with the help of the Star model and implementing this care protocol for the purpose of standardizing patient care outcomes.

Detailed description

To identify the effectiveness of a care protocol developed using the Star model on outcomes in female patients with stress incontinence. Information and evidence needs to be translated into nursing practice and applied to clinical decision-making in stress incontinence cases. Evidence-based study models such as the Star model provide guidance on using evidence to develop clinical guidelines and care protocols. The Star model is designed to improve patient outcomes by creating a bridge between research and clinical practice. There is currently no published stress incontinence care protocol based on the Star model. Although there is one published study of a care protocol for urinary incontinence, this protocol was not drawn up on the basis of an evidence-based model. Women that matched the sample criteria were recruited into the study. After their consent was obtained, the women were randomized into an intervention and a control group. The women in the intervention group were provided care according to stress incontinence care protocol. The control group received no intervention during the eight-week intervention period.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALintervention group

The women in the intervention group were provided care according to SICP

Sponsors

Kırıkkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The inclusion criteria were being female, ≥ 18 years, having an initial diagnosis of SI, being literate, having no sensory disorder affecting communication, and agreeing to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

* The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
King's Health Questionnaire20 minutesThis 32-item tool measures quality of life. Scores range from 0 - 100, with low scores indicating good quality of life.
Broome Pelvic Muscle Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale15 minutesThis instrument was developed to measure perceived self-efficacy in pelvic floor muscle exercise. It consists of 23 items organized in two subscales. The total score ranges from 0 - 100 and scores are classified as follows: ≤ 32(low self-efficacy); 33 55 points (medium self-efficacy); ≥ 56 points (high self-efficacy).
Three-day voiding diary3 daysThis is a semi-objective tool used to record voiding frequency, amount of urine, amount and type of liquid intake, incontinence frequency and the frequency of pad-changing.
One-hour pad test1 hourThis test provides an objective measure of the quantity of urine leakage in a one-hour period. Before the test, the dry pad is weighed using precision scales and this weight is deducted from the wet weight to give the weight of leaked urine (Krhut et al., 2014). First the patient is given the pre-weighed pad and is then asked to drink 500 cc water and to rest in a seated position for a half-hour. In the following half- hour, the patient stands up and sits down 10 times, coughs 10 times, runs in place for 1 minute, bends to pick something up from the floor 5 times, and then climbs a flight of stairs. After one hour, the pad is taken from the patient and re-weighed on the same precision scales. The weight of the dry pad is deducted from the weight of the wet pad and the weight of urine is recorded.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026