Skip to content

The Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Refractory CIDP Patients With IgG4 Autoantibodies

The Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab (Genetical Recombination) in Refractory Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Patients With Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) Autoantibodies in the Exploratory Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03864185
Acronym
RECIPE
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-03-06
Start date
2019-03-28
Completion date
2021-05-27
Last updated
2021-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

Keywords

IgG4 autoantibody, Neurofascin-155, Contactin-1, Rituximab

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (genetical recombination) intravenously administered to CIDP patients with positive or negative IgG4 autoantibody.

Interventions

Administer 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (genetical recombination) IV infusion once weekly for 4 doses.

OTHERPlacebo

Administer placebo IV infusion once weekly for 4 doses.

Sponsors

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nagoya University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with definite CIDP diagnosed according to the modified diagnostic criteria of European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) (2010) by the time of enrollment in the study 2. Patients meeting one of the following conditions: (i) Patients with positive serum IgG4 autoantibody (CNTN-1 or NF-155) confirmed by the time of enrollment in the study (ii) Patients with negative serum IgG4 autoantibody (CNTN-1 and NF-155) confirmed by the time of enrollment in the study 3. Patients with refractory CIDP not responding adequately to treatment with corticosteroid for 12 weeks, and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg) for 8 weeks by the time of enrollment in the study, or those who are unable to administer or continue corticosteroid and IVIg 4. Patients with total adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Scale scores of 2 to 8 at both preliminary enrollment and enrollment, and with the total score at enrollment equal to or worse than that at preliminary enrollment 5. Patients aged 12 years or older at informed consent 6. Patients who give their voluntary written consent after having received adequate information on this study (legally acceptable representatives should also give consent for underage patients, and informed assent should be obtained from children aged 12 to 15)

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with disease meeting one of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of patients with improvement in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scaleUp to 52 weeksPrimary analysis will compare scores of adjusted INCAT Disability Scale evaluated prior to treatment (at the time of enrollment) and scores at each timepoint after week 26 to calculate the proportion of patients who achieve an improvement of one and more from the baseline. The INCAT Disability Scale is an index to evaluate disorders in lower (gait) and upper (elevation of the upper arms and fine movement of the fingertips) extremities. The INCAT score is a 10-point scale and ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (worst). For the adjusted INCAT score, a change in upper extremity score from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 will not be considered meaningful in this evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) scoreUp to 52 weeksThe differences of R-ODS score between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized. R-ODS is consist of a 24-item questionnaire about daily living task with 3 response options: (0) impossible to perform, (1) performed with difficulty, and (2) easily performed. The R-ODS score is a 48-point scale (range: 0-48), and is converted into a centile metric score with values ranging from 0 (most severe activity and social participation limitations) to 100 (no activity and social participation limitations).
Change in Medical Research Council (MRC) Sum ScoreUp to 52 weeksThe differences of MRC Sum Score between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized. The MRC Sum Score is a scale to assess for 8 muscle groups (right and left side) as follow: Shoulder abduction, Elbow flexion, Wrist extension, Index finger abduction, Hip flexion, Knee extension, Foot dorsiflexion, Great toe dorsiflexion.The MRC Sum Score is a 80-point scale and ranges from 0 (paralysis) to 80 (normal strength).
Change in motor nerve distal latencyUp to 52 weeksThe differences of distal latency between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized.
Change in motor nerve proximal latencyUp to 52 weeksThe differences of proximal latency between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized.
Change in motor nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP)Up to 52 weeksThe differences of CMAP between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized.
Change in motor nerve conduction velocityUp to 52 weeksThe differences of motor nerve conduction velocity between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized.
Cerebrospinal fluid protein levelUp to 52 weeksCerebrospinal fluid protein level at each timepoint are summarized.
B cell counts (CD19 positive and CD20 positive cell counts) and T cell counts (CD3 positive, CD4 positive, and CD8 positive cell counts)Up to 52 weeksB cell counts (CD19 positive and CD20 positive cell counts) and T cell counts (CD3 positive, CD4 positive, and CD8 positive cell counts) at each timepoint are summarized.
Expression of HACAUp to 52 weeksThe number of patients expressing HACA, and the proportion and its 95% confidence interval of these patients at each timepoint are summarized.
Change in grip strength (kPa)Up to 52 weeksThe differences of Grip strength (kPa) between prior to treatment and at each timepoint are summarized.
Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of rituximab (genetical recombination)Up to 52 weeksCmax of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Area under the curve (AUC) of blood concentration of rituximab (genetical recombination)Up to 52 weeksAUC of blood concentration of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Half-life (t1/2) of rituximab (genetical recombination)Up to 52 weekst1/2 of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Clearance (CL) of rituximab (genetical recombination)Up to 52 weeksCL of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Mean residence time (MRT) of rituximab (genetical recombination)Up to 52 weeksMRT of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Volume of distribution (Vds) of rituximab (genetical recombination) levelUp to 52 weeksVds of rituximab (genetical recombination) is summarized.
Serum antibody titers of IgG4 (CNTN-1 and NF-155) and these IgG subclassUp to 52 weeksSerum titers (CNTN-1 and NF-155, and these IgG subclasses 1 to 4) at each timepoint are summarized.
Serum neurofilamentUp to 52 weeksSerum neurofilament level at each timepoint is summarized.
Serum rituximab (genetical recombination) levelUp to 52 weeksSerum rituximab (genetical recombination) level at each timepoint are summarized.

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026