Skip to content

Hemodynamics During Induction of General Anesthesia After Prophylactic Ephedrine, Phenylephrine or Norepinephrine.

Haemodynamic Stability During Induction of General Anesthesia With Propofol and Remifentanil: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study Comparing Equipotent Prophylactic Doses of Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine vs Placebo.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03864094
Acronym
VH
Enrollment
128
Registered
2019-03-06
Start date
2022-03-15
Completion date
2023-12-14
Last updated
2024-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, General, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Hemodynamic Instability

Keywords

Cardiac Output (CO), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR), Heart Rate (HR), Stroke Volume (SV), Lithium Dilutional Cardiac Output (LiDCO), Minimal Invasive Hemodynamic Monitor, Propofol, Remifentanil, Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine

Brief summary

In this trial the investigators want to examine if there is any difference in hemodynamic stability when giving equipotent prophylactic injections of ephedrine 0,1 mg/kg, phenylephrine 1 microg/kg, norepinephrine 0,1 microg/kg or sodium chloride (NaCl) 9 mg/ml during induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

Detailed description

The LiDCOplus monitoring system (Lithium Dilutional Cardiac Output (LiDCO) Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom) is a minimally invasive monitor for measuring stroke volume (SV) using two different algorithms. The PulseCO (PulseCO ™, Cambridge, United Kingdom) is based on analyses of the the arterial pressure wave giving nominal values. The LiDCO uses lithium-dilution for calibration to give absolute values. In this trial, the investigators will use the PulseCO looking at relative changes in uncalibrated hemodynamic variables. Continual changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) will be measured. Earlier studies have shown that propofol 2.5 mg/kg induction without opioid reduces CO (-15%), SV (-5 %), MAP (-33%) and SVR (-11%) and a slight reduction i HR. High-dose remifentanil anesthesia (2 microg/kg/min), in coronary patients reduced cardiac index (-25%), SV (-14%) and MAP (-39%) in a similar manner as propofol/remifentanil (propofol target 2 microg/ml and remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg/min), but systemic vascular resistance index decreased (-14%) in propofol/remifentanil combination. Several procedures have been proposed to minimize the negative hemodynamic changes during induction. Administration of a crystalloid or a colloid did not prevent the decrease in MAP after induction of general anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. The hemodynamic effects in propofol-fentanyl anesthesia of preoperative ephedrine 0.07-0.15 mg/kg vs phenylephrine 1.5 microg/kg in valve surgery and concludes that ephedrine 0.07-0.1 mg/kg is safe and effective in counteracting hypotension. A dose of 0.15 mg/kg ephedrine is suggested for preventing hypotension during anesthesia induction with propofol 2.5 mg/kg and remifentanil 3 microg/kg.

Interventions

DRUGEphedrine

0,1 mg/kg

DRUGPhenylephrine

1 microg/kg

DRUGNorepinephrine

0,1 microg/kg

DRUGSodium chloride

0,1 ml/kg

DRUGPropofol

2 mg/kg

DRUGRemifentanil

1,7 microg/kg

Sponsors

Helse Fonna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization made by a person not involved in trial in other ways. Allocation masked in sealed envelopes, stored in a locked cash box only opened by two drug preparing nurses not involved in patient care. Syringe labelled with patient identification (ID) (eg 04Vaso). Patient, Care Provider and Investigator blinded for actual concentration of drug. Allocation break after data data wash and processing.

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled, double-blind.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy women * Age 18-50 years * Gynecological procedures * General anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing hypertension * Diabetes for several years * Ischemic heart disease * Cerebrovascular disease * Heart valve disease * Verified cardiac arrhythmia * Anaemia * Kidney or hepatic disease * Hypersensitivity for soya, eggs or peanuts * Pregnancy * Poor health state * Illicit substance use * BMI \<20 or \>35 kg/m2 * SBP \>150 mmHg * HR \>100 beats/min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)First 7,5 minutes from start of inductionChange in SBP during induction as measured by the LiDCOplus monitoring system
Heart Rate (HR)First 7,5 minutes from start of inductionChange in HR during induction as measured by the LiDCOplus monitoring system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroke Volume (SV)First 7,5 minutes from start of inductionChange in SV during induction as measured by the LiDCOplus monitoring system
Cardiac Output (CO)First 7,5 minutes from a start of inductionChange in CO during induction as measured by the LiDCOplus monitoring system
Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR)First 7,5 minutes from start of inductionChange in SVR during induction as measured by the LiDCOplus monitoring system

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026