Skip to content

Saroglitazar Magnesium in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

A Phase 2, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg in Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03863574
Acronym
EVIDENCES VI
Enrollment
16
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2019-06-12
Completion date
2020-03-20
Last updated
2024-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Keywords

NASH

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg in patients with NASH. This study will be initiated after obtaining the approvals of Institutional Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (IEC/IRB) and the local regulatory authority.

Detailed description

Patients clinically suspected of NASH will be invited for a screening programme for inclusion in the study. Patients will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical evaluation will be conducted for baseline characteristics and anthropometry measurements such as body weight and height. After clinical evaluations, all baseline safety and efficacy parameters will be recorded as per Visit Schedule. All laboratory collections will be performed following overnight fasting (at least 8 hrs). Following confirmation of all clinical and laboratory inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will continue into the screening period. During the screening period liver biopsy will be performed. However, if a biopsy was performed within 6 months the slides and biopsy material, or block, must be made available for baseline documentation. Such Patients, whose historical biopsy report is available, should not use medication suspected of having an effect on NASH from the 3 months prior to the screening. Liver biopsy will be performed to confirm the diagnosis of NASH and record a baseline Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS). The histological evidence of NASH is defined as NAS ≥ 4 with a minimum score of 1 for all of its three components \[steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning and lobular inflammation\]. Following confirmation of inclusion/exclusion criteria and upon histological confirmation of NASH by liver biopsy, patients will be enrolled into the study. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg or 4 mg or placebo in a 2:2:1 ratio for 24 weeks. Upon completion of 24 weeks of treatment, liver biopsy will be performed and the NAFLD Activity Score recorded.

Interventions

DRUGSaroglitazar Magnesium 2mg

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.

DRUGPlacebos

Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Placebo tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Zydus Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients able to provide written informed consent for participation in this trial. 2. Males or females, 18 to 75 years of age, both inclusive. 3. Female must be either of non-child bearing potential (surgically sterilized at least 6 months prior to screening or postmenopausal) or using one or more methods of contraception. 4. Histologic confirmation of NASH without cirrhosis (fibrosis stage 0, 1, 2, or 3) from liver biopsy performed either during the screening period or no more than 6 months prior to the first visit, with a NAS of ≥4 and a score of at least 1 in each (steatosis scored 0-3, ballooning scored 0-2, and lobular inflammation scored 0-3). If biopsy was performed within 6 months of screening, the slides, biopsy material or block should be available for baseline documentation. Such patients, whose historical biopsy report is available, should not use medications suspected of having an effect on NASH for at least 3 months prior to the screening. 5. BMI ≥25 kg/m\^2. 6. For hypertensive patients, blood pressure must be controlled by a stable dose of antihypertensive medications for at least 3 months prior to screening (and the stable dose can be maintained throughout the study) 7. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be included if they fulfil the following criteria; 1. Stable therapeutic regimen as defined by no changes in oral agents or dose for at least 3 months before screening and the stable dose can be maintained throughout the study. 2. HbA1c ≤ 9.5% 8. Patients agree to comply with the study procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant and lactating female. 2. Positive pregnancy test. 3. Patients with history of myopathies or evidence of active muscle diseases. 4. Patients with history of alcohol consumption of \>30 gm/day for men, \>20 gm/day for women for consecutive previous 2 years and/or drug abuse. 5. Known allergy, sensitivity or intolerance to the study drug or formulation ingredients. 6. Participation in an interventional clinical study and/or receipt of any investigational medication within 3 months prior to screening. 7. History of malignancy in the past 5 years and/or active neoplasm with the exception of superficial, non-melanoma, skin cancer. 8. Any of the following laboratory values at screening: 1. Direct bilirubin \>1.5 mg/dL, 2. Serum albumin \<2.5 g/dL. 3. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m2. 4. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>200 IU/L. 5. Patient with international normalized ratio (INR) \>1.5. 6. Creatinine kinase ≥ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). 7. Lipase ≥ULN. 8. Amylase ≥ ULN. 9. Unstable cardiovascular disease, including: 1. unstable angina, (i.e., new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease within the 3 months preceding screening), acute coronary syndrome within the 6 months preceding Screening, acute myocardial infarction within the 3 months preceding screening or heart failure of New York Heart Association class (III - IV) or worsening congestive heart failure, or coronary artery intervention, within the 6 months preceding screening 2. history of (within 3 months preceding Screening) or current unstable cardiac dysrhythmias 3. uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \[BP\] \> 155 mmHg and/or diastolic BP \> 95 mmHg) 4. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the 6 months preceding screening. 10. Previous history of bladder disease and/or hematuria. 11. Previous liver biopsy that demonstrated presence of cirrhosis or radiologic imaging consistent with cirrhosis or portal hypertension. 12. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. 13. Use of drugs that are known Cytochrome P4502C8 (CYP2C8) inhibitors/substrate. 14. Use of drugs associated with a clinical or histological picture consistent with fatty liver disease or NASH for more than 12 consecutive weeks in the 1 year prior to start of the study; (these include amiodarone, tamoxifen, methotrexate, glucocorticoids, anabolic steroids, tetracyclines, estrogens, valproate/valproic acid, chloroquine, anti-HIV drugs). 15. History of thyroid disease (hypothyroid patients who are euthyroid on thyroid hormone replacement can be included). 16. History of, or current, cardiac dysrhythmias. 17. History of bariatric surgery, or undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery. 18. Patients with a \>10% weight loss in the 3 months prior to screening. 19. History or other evidence of severe illness or any other conditions that would make the patient, in the opinion of the Investigator, unsuitable for the study (such as poorly controlled psychiatric disease, coronary artery disease, HIV or active gastrointestinal conditions that might interfere with drug absorption). 20. Patients on any treatment with other drugs used for treatment of NASH \[pentoxyphyllin, ursodeoxycholic acid, antioxidants such as vitamin E (\>800 IU/day), glutathione, orlistat, betaine, incretin mimetics or non-prescribed complementary alternative medications (including dietary supplements, megadose vitamins, herbal preparations and special teas)\] or any medicine in clinical trials for NASH. (However, patients who are taking stable dose of vitamin E for at least 3 months prior to screening will be enrolled in the study). 21. History of other causes of chronic liver disease \[autoimmune, primary biliary cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), Wilson disease, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, hemochromatosis etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NAS Score (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NAFLD] Activity Score)Baseline to Week 24The primary endpoint is to assess the changes in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) at week 24 from baseline and with no worsening of fibrosis in NASH patients. NAFLD Activity Score Steatosis \<5% - 0 5% -33% - 1 \>33% -66% - 2 \>66% - 3 Lobular Inflammation No foci - 0 \<2 foci per 200 X field -1 2-4 foci per 200 X field - 2 \>4 foci per 200 X field - 3 Ballooning None - 0 Few balloon cells -1 Many cells/prominent ballooning - 2 Final NAFLD Activity Score = Steatosis Score + Lobular Inflammation Score + Ballooning Score Minimum score for NAS is 0 Maximum score for NAS is 8 Higher score represents the worse disease activity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders Defined by the Disappearance of Steatohepatitis.Baseline to Week 24Percentage of responders defined by the disappearance of steatohepatitis
Changes in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Baseline to Week 24Changes in the stage of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning by evaluating the NAS Score (Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Activity Score) Steatosis \<5% - 0 5% -33% - 1 \>33% -66% - 2 \>66% - 3 Lobular Inflammation No foci - 0 \<2 foci per 200 X field -1 2-4 foci per 200 X field - 2 \>4 foci per 200 X field - 3 Ballooning None - 0 Few balloon cells -1 Many cells/prominent ballooning - 2 Higher score represents the worse disease activity
Changes in the Stage of Fibrosis.Baseline to Week 24Changes in the stage of fibrosis by evaluating the Fibrosis stages Fibrosis Score Definition None - 0 Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1 Mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal - 1A Moderate, zone3, perisinusoidal -1B Portal/periportal -1C Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal - 2 Bridging fibrosis - 3 Cirrhosis - 4 Higher score represents the worse disease activity
Changes in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Baseline to Week 24Liver function tests include ALT, AST, ALP, GGT
Changes in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinBaseline to Week 24Changes in albumin and total protein
Changes in the Liver Function Tests; Direct BilirubinBaseline to Week 24Change in direct bilirubin
Changes in the Lipid Profile.Baseline to Week 24Evaluation of Lipid profile parameters
To Evaluate the Percentage of Responders in the Treatment Groups.Baseline to Week 24Responder is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points spread across at least 2 of the NAS components \[steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and lobular inflammation\] with no worsening of fibrosis.
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Hemoglobin A1cBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of Hemoglobin A1c
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; InsulinBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of Insulin
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: C-peptideBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of C-peptide
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA -β)Baseline to Week 24Evaluation of HOMA of Beta Cell Function Homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function measures as following; HOMA -β = fasting insulin (μU/mL) ×360/{fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63}. HOMA-B provides a quantitative estimate of beta-cell function. A lower HOMA-B value indicates reduced beta-cell function, which can be a sign of progressing towards or already having type 2 diabetes. Conversely, a higher HOMA-B value suggests better beta-cell functionality.
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: HOMA of Insulin ResistanceBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of HOMA of Insulin Resistance Insulin Resistance Index measures insulin resistance, calculated by fasting insulin (μU/mL) multiplied by fasting glucose (mg/dL), and divided by a constant (405). A higher score indicates higher insulin resistance.
Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Total AdiponectinBaseline to Week 24Evaluation of Total Adiponectin
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Consuming Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mgBaseline to Week 24Number of Participants with Adverse Events.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 24 weeks. Saroglitazar Magnesium 2mg: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.
6
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 24 weeks. Saroglitazar Magnesium 4mg: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.
7
Placebo
Placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning before breakfast for 24 weeks. Placebos: Patients randomly assigned to this group will receive Placebo tablet orally once daily for 24 weeks.
3
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgSaroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous48.67 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91
50.57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.48
63.33 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
52.25 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46
Body Mass Index37.32 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.85
37.89 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27
37.67 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.76
37.63 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants7 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 70 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 65 / 72 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 62 / 70 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

NAS Score (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NAFLD] Activity Score)

The primary endpoint is to assess the changes in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) at week 24 from baseline and with no worsening of fibrosis in NASH patients. NAFLD Activity Score Steatosis \<5% - 0 5% -33% - 1 \>33% -66% - 2 \>66% - 3 Lobular Inflammation No foci - 0 \<2 foci per 200 X field -1 2-4 foci per 200 X field - 2 \>4 foci per 200 X field - 3 Ballooning None - 0 Few balloon cells -1 Many cells/prominent ballooning - 2 Final NAFLD Activity Score = Steatosis Score + Lobular Inflammation Score + Ballooning Score Minimum score for NAS is 0 Maximum score for NAS is 8 Higher score represents the worse disease activity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgNAS Score (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NAFLD] Activity Score)-1.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgNAS Score (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NAFLD] Activity Score)-1.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
PlaceboNAS Score (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NAFLD] Activity Score)-1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
p-value: 0.7689t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.6007t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: C-peptide

Evaluation of C-peptide

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: C-peptide-1.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.26
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: C-peptide0.08 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: C-peptide0.27 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.95
p-value: 0.3605t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.8394t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Fasting Plasma Glucose

Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Fasting Plasma Glucose2.67 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.18
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Fasting Plasma Glucose-0.86 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.1
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Fasting Plasma Glucose7.67 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.5
p-value: 0.6988t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.7413t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Hemoglobin A1c

Evaluation of Hemoglobin A1c

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Hemoglobin A1c-0.52 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.65
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Hemoglobin A1c-0.09 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.28
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Hemoglobin A1c0.03 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.35
p-value: 0.22t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.5798t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: HOMA of Insulin Resistance

Evaluation of HOMA of Insulin Resistance Insulin Resistance Index measures insulin resistance, calculated by fasting insulin (μU/mL) multiplied by fasting glucose (mg/dL), and divided by a constant (405). A higher score indicates higher insulin resistance.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: HOMA of Insulin Resistance0.45 percentage of HOMA of Insulin ResistanceStandard Deviation 8.3
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: HOMA of Insulin Resistance2.73 percentage of HOMA of Insulin ResistanceStandard Deviation 5.77
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: HOMA of Insulin Resistance2.34 percentage of HOMA of Insulin ResistanceStandard Deviation 4.18
p-value: 0.7267t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.9211t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA -β)

Evaluation of HOMA of Beta Cell Function Homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function measures as following; HOMA -β = fasting insulin (μU/mL) ×360/{fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63}. HOMA-B provides a quantitative estimate of beta-cell function. A lower HOMA-B value indicates reduced beta-cell function, which can be a sign of progressing towards or already having type 2 diabetes. Conversely, a higher HOMA-B value suggests better beta-cell functionality.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA -β)-34.35 percentage of HOMA of Beta Cell FunctionStandard Deviation 84.41
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA -β)14.49 percentage of HOMA of Beta Cell FunctionStandard Deviation 358.04
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA -β)30.10 percentage of HOMA of Beta Cell FunctionStandard Deviation 46.15
p-value: 0.2665t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.9133t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Insulin

Evaluation of Insulin

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Insulin-1.05 μIU/mLStandard Deviation 20.05
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Insulin6.74 μIU/mLStandard Deviation 15.34
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance; Insulin8.13 μIU/mLStandard Deviation 12.32
p-value: 0.4981t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.8939t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Total Adiponectin

Evaluation of Total Adiponectin

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Total Adiponectin1.84 μg/mLStandard Deviation 2.17
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Total Adiponectin0.68 μg/mLStandard Deviation 3.28
PlaceboChanges in the Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance: Total Adiponectin1.50 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.02
p-value: 0.8683t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.7436t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Lipid Profile.

Evaluation of Lipid profile parameters

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in non-HDL Cholesterol4.83 mg/dLStandard Deviation 33.68
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in High-density Lipoprotein6.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.85
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Total Cholesterol11.17 mg/dLStandard Deviation 40.45
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Very low-density lipoprotein-8.17 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.41
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Low-density lipoprotein13.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.89
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Triglyceride-40.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 38.37
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein A110.50 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36.74
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Small dense LDL1.27 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.99
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein B1.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.53
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Low-density lipoprotein-12.57 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.11
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Triglyceride-16.71 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.31
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Total Cholesterol-16.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.12
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Small dense LDL-9.29 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.85
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in High-density Lipoprotein-0.14 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.47
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Very low-density lipoprotein-3.29 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.88
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in non-HDL Cholesterol-15.86 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29.23
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein A1-14.29 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.98
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein B-14.71 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.04
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Small dense LDL5.87 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.66
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Triglyceride-6.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.04
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in non-HDL Cholesterol-7.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.29
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Total Cholesterol-0.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.02
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein B-1.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.62
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Low-density lipoprotein-6.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.29
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in High-density Lipoprotein7.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.36
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Apo lipoprotein A17.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.08
PlaceboChanges in the Lipid Profile.Change in Very low-density lipoprotein-1.33 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.51
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Triglyceridep-value: 0.2329t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Triglyceridep-value: 0.7211t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variables: Total Cholesterolp-value: 0.652t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Total Cholesterolp-value: 0.4302t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: High-density Lipoproteinp-value: 0.9432t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: High-density Lipoproteinp-value: 0.2133t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Low-density lipoproteinp-value: 0.2446t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Low-density lipoproteinp-value: 0.7075t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Very low-density lipoproteinp-value: 0.2195t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Very low-density lipoproteinp-value: 0.7435t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: non-HDL Cholesterolp-value: 0.5702t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: non-HDL Cholesterolp-value: 0.6441t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Apo lipoprotein A1p-value: 0.8415t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Apo lipoprotein A1p-value: 0.0786t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Apo lipoprotein Bp-value: 0.8878t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome variable: Apo lipoprotein Bp-value: 0.3219t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Small dense LDLp-value: 0.6557t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Small dense LDLp-value: 0.0763t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).

Liver function tests include ALT, AST, ALP, GGT

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALT-22.83 U/LStandard Deviation 14.29
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in AST-10.33 U/LStandard Deviation 5.32
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALP-24.00 U/LStandard Deviation 9.92
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in GGT-23.83 U/LStandard Deviation 18.55
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in GGT-28.43 U/LStandard Deviation 33.3
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALT-29.57 U/LStandard Deviation 26.76
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALP-23.86 U/LStandard Deviation 15.18
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in AST-16.29 U/LStandard Deviation 11.63
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in GGT-1.67 U/LStandard Deviation 19.5
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in AST-19.33 U/LStandard Deviation 47.44
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALP3.67 U/LStandard Deviation 5.13
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALT], Aspartate Aminotransferase [AST], Alkaline Phosphatases [ALP], and Gamma-glutamyl Transferase [GGT]).Change in ALT-14.67 U/LStandard Deviation 48.95
Comparison: Outcome variable: Alanine Aminotransferasep-value: 0.8019t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Alanine Aminotransferasep-value: 0.5396t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Aspartate Aminotransferasep-value: 0.774t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Aspartate Aminotransferasep-value: 0.9221t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Alkaline Phosphatasep-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Alkaline Phosphatasep-value: 0.0177t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Gamma Glutamyl Transferasep-value: 0.1399t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Gamma Glutamyl Transferasep-value: 0.2384t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total Protein

Changes in albumin and total protein

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Modified intend-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in albumin-0.05 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.22
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in total protein-0.08 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.4
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in albumin-0.04 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.17
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in total protein0.09 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.41
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in albumin0.13 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Albumin and Total ProteinChange in total protein0.27 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.06
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Albuminp-value: 0.2218t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Albuminp-value: 0.1483t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Total Proteinp-value: 0.0839t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Total Proteinp-value: 0.2895t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Liver Function Tests; Direct Bilirubin

Change in direct bilirubin

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Direct Bilirubin-0.01 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.03
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Direct Bilirubin-0.01 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChanges in the Liver Function Tests; Direct Bilirubin-0.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.02
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Direct Bilirubinp-value: 0.6808t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Direct Bilirubinp-value: 0.5351t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Stage of Fibrosis.

Changes in the stage of fibrosis by evaluating the Fibrosis stages Fibrosis Score Definition None - 0 Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1 Mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal - 1A Moderate, zone3, perisinusoidal -1B Portal/periportal -1C Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal - 2 Bridging fibrosis - 3 Cirrhosis - 4 Higher score represents the worse disease activity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Stage of Fibrosis.-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Stage of Fibrosis.-0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
PlaceboChanges in the Stage of Fibrosis.0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
p-value: 0.1705t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.174t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Changes in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.

Changes in the stage of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning by evaluating the NAS Score (Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Activity Score) Steatosis \<5% - 0 5% -33% - 1 \>33% -66% - 2 \>66% - 3 Lobular Inflammation No foci - 0 \<2 foci per 200 X field -1 2-4 foci per 200 X field - 2 \>4 foci per 200 X field - 3 Ballooning None - 0 Few balloon cells -1 Many cells/prominent ballooning - 2 Higher score represents the worse disease activity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of lobular inflammation-0.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of steatosis-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of ballooning-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of lobular inflammation-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of steatosis-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of ballooning-0.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of steatosis-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of ballooning-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChanges in the Stage of Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation and Ballooning.Changes in the stage of lobular inflammation-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Steatosisp-value: 0.6845t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Steatosisp-value: 0.4625t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Lobular Inflammationp-value: 0.1705t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome variable: Lobular Inflammationp-value: 0.3122t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Hepatocyte Ballooningp-value: 0.1705t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Outcome Variable: Hepatocyte Ballooningp-value: 0.3877t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Consuming Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg

Number of Participants with Adverse Events.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Consuming Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg3 Participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Consuming Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Consuming Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mg and 4 mg2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders Defined by the Disappearance of Steatohepatitis.

Percentage of responders defined by the disappearance of steatohepatitis

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgPercentage of Responders Defined by the Disappearance of Steatohepatitis.5 Participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgPercentage of Responders Defined by the Disappearance of Steatohepatitis.6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders Defined by the Disappearance of Steatohepatitis.0 Participants
p-value: 0.0476Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0333Fisher Exact
Secondary

To Evaluate the Percentage of Responders in the Treatment Groups.

Responder is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points spread across at least 2 of the NAS components \[steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and lobular inflammation\] with no worsening of fibrosis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: modified intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Saroglitazar Magnesium 2 mgTo Evaluate the Percentage of Responders in the Treatment Groups.4 Participants
Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mgTo Evaluate the Percentage of Responders in the Treatment Groups.3 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Percentage of Responders in the Treatment Groups.1 Participants
p-value: 0.5238Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.9999Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026