Skip to content

Short Interventions to Prevent Trapezius Muscle Fatigue in Computer Work

Trapezius Muscle Fatigue of Long Duration: a Likely Neuromuscular Control Issue

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03863340
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2016-03-14
Completion date
2016-09-05
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Fatigue, Trapezius Muscle Strain

Keywords

muscle fatigue, work-related disorders, trapezius myalgia, sustained working task, high-density EMG

Brief summary

This study is expected to demonstrate that during experimental days of seated computer work sustained and focalized low-level muscle activity contributes to the development of long-lasting fatigue effects (and thus possible disorder). On days with and without frequent interruptions, signs of fatigue and the activity pattern of the trapeze muscle are registered and compared using electromyographic registrations of the trapezius muscle.

Detailed description

30 healthy adults without chronic neck pain participated in a laboratory study designed to simulate two full workdays of computer work. Within each session, participants performed five 50-min working activities separated by 10-min breaks: i) Use a computer keyboard to type a text presented on the left side of the screen; ii) do the typing task with the desk height set10 cm above elbow height; iii) play the computer game Spider Solitaire implemented in Windows 10; iv) Stroop test (This test consists of reading the name of a color whose text is in a color different from the name. The color name was then selected from a multiple-choice panel displaying color names; v) the same online puzzle game was presented to all participants. Assembling the puzzle was performed by drag and drop actions. The work periods were not disrupted (on the control day) whereas two short interruptions of 5-min were introduced at 1/3 and 2/3 of each working period on the intervention day. During these interruptions, participants were asked to perform muscle disrupting/relaxing activities. For each experimental session a 30-min lunch break took place between the third and the fourth work periods. The specific sequence of work activity type and disrupting/relaxing activities was randomized across participants; however, for each participant the order of work activities remained the same for the two experimental sessions (control and intervention days). The order of control and intervention days was also randomized between participants. A set of six measures were performed at specific time intervals during each experiment: before the first work activity, before and after lunch, immediately and 1 hour after the fifth (last) work activity: i) upper trapezius activation, assessed through the temporal EMG profile recorded by a single bipolar signal; and ii) through the spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels); iii) muscle fatigue, quantified by changes in electrically induced muscle twitch force signals, iv) isometric performance, v) dynamic performance; iii) cognitive and physical load and stress level. In addition, personality traits (anxiety level), perceived workload and musculoskeletal symptoms were evaluated as covariates.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALinterruptions of work tasks

During each activity two interruptions/breaks were selected randomly from a set of ten predetermined actions: Active break types: * Move shoulder and upper back * Swing arms near the body * Three slow but forceful elevations of the shoulders, a relaxation exercise based on the principles developed by Jacobson * Stand up and stretch * Slowly turn head in all possible directions. Passive break types: * Tell a couple of jokes * Stand up and have a drink * Relaxing the trapezius * Questions on actual posture and feelings of comfort / discomfort. * A short rest on the couch

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Lausanne
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participants were informed that the study investigates neuro-motor mechanisms but not about the more specific research questions.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled laboratory experiment. 30 subjects are randomly assigned to two full day experiments either starting with the conditions including additional short interventions or without them.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy experienced computer workers

Exclusion criteria

* chronic pain (more than 30 days within the last 12 months according to the Nordic Questionnaire (Kuorinka et al 1987); * pathologies of the neck, * prior and actual shoulder or neck pain caused by an accident, * skin disease in the neck or shoulder area, * BMI \> 30, * sleep disorders (e.g. apnea, restless legs syndrome), * use of medications such as psychotropic drugs, muscle relaxants or analgesics within the last 3 days prior to the experiment, * pregnancy. * any shoulder/neck pain on the day before the experiment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle fatigue: Change of muscle twitchChange between 30 min before the beginning of the simulated working activity and 30 min after the end of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention day3-D muscle twitch acceleration pattern measured at the acromion
Muscle fatigue: Change of dynamic force control accuracyChange between 30 min before the beginning of the simulated working activity and 30 min after the end of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayForce control accuracy (mean squared error between the produced force (N) and the target force (N)) in an isometric dynamic tracking task
Spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity: Area of muscle activityContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayThe spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity is detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels) and the following outcomes are determined: Area of muscle active region (n. of channels)
EMG profile recorded by a single bipolar electrode: Rest-timeContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayRest-time (percentage of time below 5% of the standard activity level). The percentage of registration time without any rest time is called sustained low level muscle activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity: Number of active epochsContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayThe spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity is detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels) and the following outcomes are determined: Number of active epochs
EMG profile recorded by a single bipolar electrode: Static activityContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayp10 (level of the 10th percentile of the trapezius muscle activity) as an indicator of static activity primarily associated with continuous activity of the same pool of motor units.
Spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity: Magnitude of activityContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayThe spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity is detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels) and the following outcomes are determined: Magnitude of activity of muscle active regions (RMS sEMG).
Muscle fatigue: Change of static force controlChange between 30 min before the beginning of the simulated working activity and 30 min after the end of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayForce control accuracy (mean squared error between the produced force (N) and the target force (N)) in isometric isotonic low level contraction
Muscle fatigue: Change of force control in ramp contractionChange between 30 min before the beginning of the simulated working activity and 30 min after the end of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayForce control accuracy (mean squared error between the produced force (N) and the target force (N)) in isometric ramp contraction.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual and general fatigueAt the start, and 70min, 130min, 190min, 310min, 370 min after the beginning of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention day10 cm visual analog scales
Spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity: Centroid of active regionsContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayThe spatio-temporal distribution of EMG activity is detected by a 2D array of electrodes (64 channels) and the following outcomes are determined: Centroid of active regions
EMG profile recorded by a single bipolar electrode: Dynamic activityContinuously from the beginning to 370 min (end) of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayp90 (level of the 90th percentile of the trapezius muscle activity) as an indicator of dynamic activity which may promote variability in the recruitment of motor units
Localized musculoskeletal discomfortAt the start, and 70min, 130min, 190min, 310min, 370 min after the beginning of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention dayhead-neck-shoulders-lower back-elbows-wrists-hip-upper legs-knees-ankles-feet-discomfort rated on 10 cm visual analog scales (adapted from Nordic questionnaire (Kuorinka et al 1987)
EffortAt the start, and 70min, 130min, 190min, 310min, 370 min after the beginning of the simulated working activity of both the control and intervention day6-20 Borg scale (6= no effort, 20=maximal possible effort)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026