Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03863002
Enrollment
45
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2022-10-01
Last updated
2019-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Failure, Acute on Chronic

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cell

Brief summary

Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Detailed description

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) which occurs in patients with chronic liver disease, is a serious live-threatening disease. Currently, the clinical management, such as liver protection, anti-virus medicine, and artificial liver support, has not significantly improve the outcomes, the mortality still remains over 50%. Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment of ACLF, but this therapy is limited by the shortage of donor organs, potential surgical complications, immunological rejection and high medical costs. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) is one of adult stem cells, which has been suggested to play a role in amelioration of liver disease, such as: trans-differentiation of MSCs into hepatocytes, immunomodulation, inhibition of fibrosis development, protective effects on hepatic cell and restoration of hepatic cell proliferation capacity.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMesenchymal Stem Cell

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation via peripheral vein: 1.0-10x10\^5 MSCs/kg body weight administered via peripheral vein at week 0, 1, 2, 3 weeks

Sponsors

Tianjin Nankai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tianjin Weikai Bioeng., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

both participants and the study team are unblinded to the treatment allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Informed consent 2. Meeting the definition of ACLF: patients with previously diagnosed or undiagnosed chronic liver disease acute decompensated within 4 weeks; significant GI symptom as such fatigue, jaundice; serum total bilirubin \[TBil\] ≥10 X the upper limit of normal; coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \[INR\] ≥1.5 or prothrombin activity \[PTA\] \<40%); complicated within 4 weeks by ascites and/or encephalopathy as determined by physical examination. 3. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores ranging 17-30, (MELD(i) = 0.957 × ln(Cr) + 0.378 × ln(bilirubin) + 1.120 × ln(INR) + 0.643); 4. Chronic liver disease with definitive etiology such as viral hepatitis, alcohol liver disease, drug induced liver injury or autoimmune liver diseases 5. Body weight ≥50kg

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious complications in the previous 2 months (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding: hemoglobin below 90g/L, serious infection such as sepsis, ascites ultrafiltration, and/or dialysis); 2. Malignant jaundice induced by obstructive jaundice or hemolytic jaundice; 3. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed by radiologic imaging and/or alpha fetoprotein (AFP); 4. Tumor diagnosed by ultrasound, CT, MR examination; 5. Moderate or severe chronic heart failure (NYHA III-IV), renal replacement therapy, severe chronic pulmonary disease (GOLD III-IV) 6. Extrahepatic cholestasis 7. Hepatic, portal and splenic vein thrombosis diagnosed by doppler ultrasound 8. Artificial liver support 9. Previous liver transplantation 10. Drug abuse in the past 5 years; 11. Mental disorders and/or has a family history of mental disorder. 12. HIV infection 13. Pregnant or breast-feeding females 14. Highly allergic 15. Patients can not cooperate or mobility 16. Enrolled in other clinical trials with 3 months 17. Patients who can not provide prior informed consent or refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survival rate72 weeks after treatmentNumber of participants alive

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
White blood cellWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of white blood cell count
PlateletWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of platelet count
HemoglobinWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of hemoglobin level
CreatinineWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of creatinine level as a surrogate marker of liver function
ALTWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level as a marker of liver function
ALBWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of albumin (ALB) level as a maker of liver function
Adverse reactionsWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Number of participants with adverse reactions (e.g. fever, rash, and diarrhea )
INRsWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of international normalized ratio (INRs) level as a marker of liver function
AFPWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level as a marker of liver function
MELD scoresWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease is measured as absolute change to baseline score
Tumor formationWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Number of participants with hepatocellular carcinoma or extrahepatic malignant tumors
Liver failure-associated serious complicationsWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Number of participants with liver failure-associated serious complications, such as infections, encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding and HRS
TBilWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Change of total Bilirubin (TBil) level as a marker of liver function

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiuli Cong, MD, PhD
cong_xiuli@163.com+86 18512507567

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026