Skip to content

Low Intensity Shock-wave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in Penile Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy

Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in Penile Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03862599
Acronym
LiST-PRP
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2025-05-01
Last updated
2023-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

Keywords

erectile dysfunction, shockwave, treatment, prostatectomy

Brief summary

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is reported in up to 85% of men who have undergone a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. A few small studies have recently shown that low-intensity shockwave therapy may improve sexual performance in men with ED. However, the optimal dosage and length of treatment is yet to be determined. The investigators propose a randomised trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy in men with ED following prostatectomy surgery.

Detailed description

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is reported in up to 85% of men who have undergone a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. At present, this debilitating consequence of surgery is managed in a step-wise approach including oral medication, injections and in severe cases, insertion of a penile prosthesis. A few small studies have shown that low-intensity shockwave therapy may improve sexual performance in men with ED. However, the optimal dosage and length of treatment is yet to be determined. The investigators propose a randomised trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy in men with ED following prostatectomy surgery. Low-intensity shockwave therapy would be a non-invasive treatment to preserve and improve patient's sexual function.

Interventions

low-intensity extra-corporeal shockwave therapy

OTHERStandard care

Cialis and vacuum pump

Sponsors

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking of probe applicator at device manufacturer before ESWT use

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 40 - 65 * Diagnosed with low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer: * PSA \< 20 ng/ml * Gleason score \< 8 * PCa stage =\< T2b * Baseline IIEF-ED 17-30 without erectogenic aids * No pre-operative urinary incontinence (no usage of urinary pads) * Sexually active * Able to understand and complete patient questionnaires * Consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Anatomical abnormalities in the genitalia or pelvic region * Post-RP complications that could impact safety or effectiveness of ESWT (eg. hematoma, fistula, unresolved anastomotic leak) * Incomplete tumor removal (positive surgical margin) * Tumor upstaging beyond T2b * Nerve sparing score \> 5 * Previous or scheduled treatment with pelvic radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy * Untreated hypogonadism (serum total testosterone \< 300 mg/dL) * Anti-coagulant medication, except acetylsalicyclic acid up to 100mg daily * Any other condition that would prevent the patient from completing the study, as judged by the principle investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual Function6 monthsMeasurement of average change in IIEF-ED from baseline (pre-RP) to 24 week-FU 22-25: No erectile dysfunction 17-21: Mild erectile dysfunction 12-16: Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction 8-11: Moderate erectile dysfunction 5-7: Severe erectile dysfunction 5 being the worst outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Penile length12 monthsClinical measurement of change in stretched flaccid penile length from baseline and time points to 12 months
Urinary Incontinence12 monthsMeasurement of average change in EPIC questionnaire from baseline (pre-RP) to 24 week-FU and time points to 12 months
Adverse Events12 monthsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactTet Yap, FRCS (Urol)
tet.yap@gstt.nhs.uk07748182772
Backup ContactFindlay MacAskill, MRCS
findlay.macaskill@gstt.nhs.uk07748182772

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026