Skip to content

Medico-economics and QoL of Obese Patients Followed by Medical Analysis Laboratories (BIOSAOS )

Medico-economic and Quality of Life Evaluations in Obese Patients Followed by Medical Analysis Laboratories

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03861468
Acronym
BIOSAOS
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-03-04
Start date
2019-09-14
Completion date
2022-12-06
Last updated
2023-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome, Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

obesity hypoventilation syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, bicarbonates, STOP-BANG

Brief summary

Obesity is a major risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, OSA is still largely under diagnosed in patients with a high cardiovascular risk. In this population the STOP-BANG questionnaire facilitates OSA screening. Moreover, blood bicarbonate concentration is a simple tool to screen for chronic respiratory disease and if elevated, is a marker of cardiometabolic comorbidities in obese patients. A combination of blood bicarbonate concentration and STOP BANG score could provide a cost-effective method of screening for OSA in obese patients. Such screening could enable earlier management and might significantly reduce the costs of treatment and improve the quality of life of patients at 2 years.

Detailed description

OSA is a frequent condition in the general population (3% of women and 10% of men), but remains largely undiagnosed. Obesity is a risk factor for OSA. Sleep apnea is associated with diurnal and nocturnal symptoms (snoring, somnolence, fatigue), and with increased cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. Currently, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment for OSA and the cost-effectiveness of this treatment has already been demonstrated. Easy-to-use procedures to identify OSA patients earlier and thus to initiate treatment earlier, need to be developed and validated. The STOP-BANG questionnaire has been designed to facilitate the screening of OSA patients. Moreover, a measure of blood bicarbonate concentration is a simple method for screening for chronic respiratory diseases and a marker of cardiometabolic comorbidities. A combination of blood bicarbonate measurement and STOP-BANG score could permit earlier screening and less expensive care of obese patients. The hypothesize is that such OSA screening in the obese population (bicarbonates + STOPBANG) associated with earlier care (with treatment if necessary) could lead to improvement in quality of life of obese patients at 2 years.

Interventions

Screening for OSA using a combination of bicarbonate assay and STOP-BANG questionnaire and further management by a pneumologist as necessary

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Poitiers University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Union hospital, Toulouse
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Alpes Leman, Annemasse
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital La Louvière, Lille
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Oriade Laboratory, Vizille
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cerballiance laboratories, Lille
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Oriade laboratory, Annemasse
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open, controlled, randomized clinical trial (cluster randomization)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged from 18 to 80 years * Obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m²) * Referred by GPs to the medical analysis laboratory for usual biological assessment * Patients with no respiratory follow-up already in place * Patient affiliated with a social protection plan * Bicarbonate - Concentration ≥ 27 mmol/L * STOP-BANG score ≥ 3 * Informed written consent signed by the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Acute disease or recently diagnosed chronic disease (\< 2 months) * Hospitalization for respiratory, metabolic or cardiovascular event (\< 2 months) * Renal insufficiency stage 4 or 5, or autoimmune disease, or viral hepatitis, or cirrhosis * Cited persons in Sections L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (pregnant woman, parturient, nursing mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, a person who is the subject of a judicial or administrative legal protection) * Patients already included in an interventional study (end of the study \< 1 month)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-year medico-economic impact of the implementation of early care in obese patients with OSA24 monthsincremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 24 months calculated from the difference in healthcare costs between the 2 groups (early care vs usual care) adjusted to the difference in the number of quality adjusted life years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact on laboratory test results (troponin) at 12 months12 monthstroponin
Impact on laboratory test results (troponin) at 24 months24 monthstroponin
Impact on laboratory test results (NT-proBNP) at 12 months12 monthsNT-proBNP
Impact on laboratory test results (NT-proBNP) at 24 months24 monthsNT-proBNP
Impact on laboratory test results on cholesterol at 12 months12 monthscholesterol
Impact on laboratory test results on cholesterol at 24 months24 monthscholesterol
Impact on laboratory test results on triglycerides at 12 months12 monthstriglycerides
Economic impact of the implementation of early care in obese patients with OSA over 3 years on the healthcare costs3 yearsThe economic impact on healthcare costs from the Health Insurer's perspective will be calculated from the difference in healthcare costs between the two groups (early care vs usual care)
To evaluate the sensitivity of the screening tool24 monthsThe sensitivity will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
To evaluate the specificity of the screening tool24 monthsThe specificity will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
To evaluate the negative Predictive Value24 monthsThe negative predictive value will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
To evaluate the positive predictive value of the screening tool24 monthsThe positive predictive value will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on blood pressure at 12 months12 monthsBlood pressure at home
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on blood pressure at 24 months24 monthsBlood pressure at home
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on quality of life at 12 months12 monthsThe EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire, This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health status. 0 means the worst health status.
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on quality of life at 24 months24 monthsThe EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire, This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health status. 0 means the worst health status.
Impact on laboratory test results on triglycerides at 24 months24 monthstriglycerides
Clinical impact of the early care pathway (early care) on quality of life at 24 months24 monthsStroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL), This questionnaire is intended to study the relationship between sleep and the quality of life. This scale is numbered from 0 to 4. higher values represent a worse outcome
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on pharmacological treatments at 12 months12 monthsnumber of pharmacological treatments
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on pharmacological treatments at 24 months24 monthsnumber of pharmacological treatments
Impact on laboratory test results on glycaemia at 12 months12 monthsglycaemia
Impact on laboratory test results on glycaemia at 24 months24 monthsglycaemia
Impact on laboratory test results on Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index at 12 months12 monthsHomeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index
Impact on laboratory test results on Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index at 24 months24 monthsHomeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index
Impact on laboratory test results on hepatic transaminases at 12 months12 monthstransaminases (ASAT, ALAT)
Impact on laboratory test results on hepatic transaminases at 24 months24 monthstransaminases (ASAT, ALAT)
Impact on laboratory test results on creatinine at 12 months12 monthscreatinine
Impact on laboratory test results on creatinine at 24 months24 monthscreatinine
Impact on laboratory test results on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at 12 months12 monthsC-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Impact on laboratory test results on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at 24 months24 monthsC-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Impact on laboratory test results on alpha2-macroglobulin at 12 months12 monthsalpha2-macroglobulin
Impact on laboratory test results on alpha2-macroglobulin at 24 months24 monthsalpha2-macroglobulin
Clinical impact of the early care pathway (early care) on quality of life at 12 months12 monthsStroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL), This questionnaire is intended to study the relationship between sleep and the quality of life. This scale is numbered from 0 to 4. higher values represent a worse outcome

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026