Skip to content

BONEBRIDGE Bone Conduction Implant in Adults

Outcomes in Adults With Mixed or Conductive Hearing Loss Implanted With the BONEBRIDGE

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03859648
Enrollment
9
Registered
2019-03-01
Start date
2019-08-26
Completion date
2022-11-04
Last updated
2024-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Mixed

Brief summary

Approximately thirty subjects with mixed or conductive hearing loss, meeting FDA-cleared candidacy criteria for the BONEBRIDGE, will be implanted and followed for three (3) months post-activation to assess safety and effectiveness of the BONEBRIDGE implant.

Interventions

Bone Conduction Implant

Sponsors

Med-El Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults, 18 years of age or older at the time of implantation * Conductive or mixed hearing loss, defined as: * Conductive hearing loss with pure-tone average (PTA) for bone conduction thresholds better than or equal to 25 dB at 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz * Mixed hearing loss with PTA for bone conduction thresholds better than or equal to 45dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz * Air-bone gap greater than or equal to 30 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz * Ability to benefit from amplification as defined by a monosyllabic (CNC) word score of 30% correct or better * Bilateral BONEBRIDGE can be considered if the difference in PTA for bone conduction thresholds is 10 dB or less between the right and left ears * Prior experience with acoustic or bone conduction hearing aids, unless candidate is unable to wear amplification for medical reasons * Able to complete testing materials in English * CT scan indicating the patient's anatomy is adequate to enable placement of the implant * Ability to undergo general anesthesia * Appropriate motivation and expectation levels * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence that hearing loss is retrocochlear in origin * Skin or scalp condition precluding use of external audio processor * Suspected cognitive impairment or organic brain dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Device Related Adverse EventsUp to three (3 months) post activationAdverse events will be collected and reported throughout the duration of the study.
Percentage Change in AZ Bio Sentence Score in NoiseBaseline and 3 months post activationPercent improvement in AZ Bio sentence in noise scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in CNC Word ScoreBaseline and 3 months post activationPercent improvement in CNC word scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation.
Number of Subjects With Stable or Better Soundfield ThresholdsBaseline and 3 months post activationThe number of subjects with stable or better aided soundfield thresholds at 3 months post activation compared to baseline unaided soundfield thresholds
Number of Subjects With Better QuickSIN Signal-to-noise-ratio PerformanceBaseline and 3 months post activationThe number of subjects with similar or better performance on the QuickSIN (Speech In Noise) task in the implanted ear compared to baseline performance
Number of Subjects With Stable Unaided Bone Conduction ThresholdsBaseline and 2 weeks post surgeryThe number of subjects with stable bone conduction thresholds at the device activation interval compared to pre-operative bone conduction thresholds.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BONEBRIDGE
All subjects implanted with the transcutaneous bone conduction implant.
8
Total8

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBONEBRIDGE
Age, Continuous47 years
Duration of hearing loss28.4 years
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Number and Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Device Related Adverse Events

Adverse events will be collected and reported throughout the duration of the study.

Time frame: Up to three (3 months) post activation

Population: One subject did not pursue surgery after baseline evaluation. This subject was removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BONEBRIDGENumber and Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Device Related Adverse Events1 Participants
Primary

Percentage Change in AZ Bio Sentence Score in Noise

Percent improvement in AZ Bio sentence in noise scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post activation

Population: One subject was lost to follow up after 1 month, and one subject did not participate in postoperative intervals due to an adverse event. These subjects were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
BONEBRIDGEPercentage Change in AZ Bio Sentence Score in Noise42.2 percent improvement
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Better QuickSIN Signal-to-noise-ratio Performance

The number of subjects with similar or better performance on the QuickSIN (Speech In Noise) task in the implanted ear compared to baseline performance

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post activation

Population: One subject was lost to follow up after 1 month, and one subject did not participate in postoperative intervals due to an adverse event. These subjects were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BONEBRIDGENumber of Subjects With Better QuickSIN Signal-to-noise-ratio Performance6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Stable or Better Soundfield Thresholds

The number of subjects with stable or better aided soundfield thresholds at 3 months post activation compared to baseline unaided soundfield thresholds

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post activation

Population: One subject was lost to follow up after 1 month, one subject did not participate in postoperative intervals due to an adverse event, and sound field data was missing for one subject. These subjects were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BONEBRIDGENumber of Subjects With Stable or Better Soundfield Thresholds5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Stable Unaided Bone Conduction Thresholds

The number of subjects with stable bone conduction thresholds at the device activation interval compared to pre-operative bone conduction thresholds.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks post surgery

Population: One subject did not participate in postoperative intervals due to an adverse event. These subjects were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BONEBRIDGENumber of Subjects With Stable Unaided Bone Conduction Thresholds7 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change in CNC Word Score

Percent improvement in CNC word scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post activation

Population: One subject was lost to follow up after 1 month, and one subject did not participate in postoperative intervals due to an adverse event. These subjects were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
BONEBRIDGEPercentage Change in CNC Word Score38.3 percent improvement

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026