Skip to content

Effects of TENS on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing AVR

Effects of TENS on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing AVR

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03859115
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-03-01
Start date
2019-03-15
Completion date
2021-01-04
Last updated
2021-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Protection

Keywords

transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, sevoflurane, propofol, anesthesia, myocardial protection

Brief summary

Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement are randomized to receive TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) or sham stimulation at one arm for 30 min under various anesthetic conditions: no anesthesia (preanesthesia), sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia. Cardioprotective effects of TENS are compared through Langendorff rat heart perfusion system using plasma dialysate from patients.

Detailed description

Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement are randomized to one of six groups: preanesthesia-TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), preanesthesia-sham, sevoflurane-TENS, sevoflurane-sham, propofol-TENS, propofol-sham. Patients receive TENS or sham stimulation (without electrical pulse generation) at one arm for 30 min under no anesthesia (preanesthesia) or sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia. In all patients, blood samples are obtained before and after TENS or sham procedure to make plasma dialysate to perfuse rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury through Langendorff system. Cardioprotective effects are determined by comparing infarct sizes of rat hearts perfused with human plasma dialysate, which reflects cardioprotective effects of TENS in human subjects. By comparing infarct size differences, the myocardial protective effects of TENS in various anesthetic conditions can be determined in human subjects undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Interventions

transcutaneous nerve stimulation with electrical pulse generation

PROCEDUREsham intervention

sham stimulation without electrical pulse generation

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing aortic valve replacement

Exclusion criteria

* co-medications: metformin, nitroglycerine, nicorandil * discomfort at TENS or loss of intact skin * uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus * severely impaired renal or hepatic function * peripheral vasculopathy or neuropathy * did not consent to participate * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infarct size after TENS30 minutesInfarct size of rat hearts perfused with dialysate after TENS compared with sham

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026