Skip to content

Reducing Post-Hospital Mortality in HIV-infected Adults in Tanzania

Reducing Post-Hospital Mortality in HIV-infected Adults in Tanzania

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03858998
Enrollment
500
Registered
2019-03-01
Start date
2019-03-05
Completion date
2024-05-31
Last updated
2025-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

This research is being done to assess the efficacy of a case management intervention to improve the one year mortality rate of hospitalized, HIV-infected, Tanzanian adults.

Detailed description

This research is being done to assess the efficacy of a case management intervention to improve the one year mortality rate of hospitalized, HIV-infected, Tanzanian adults. The study is being conducted at hospitals in Mwanza, Tanzania. 500 participants will be enrolled: 250 will be randomized to the case management intervention and 250 will randomized to routine clinical care. The case management intervention consists of 5 sessions over 90 days, and is designed to link hospitalized, HIV-infected patients to long term care at an HIV clinic. Participants will be followed for two years in order to evaluate primary and secondary study objectives. Secondary outcome measures time frames have been updated to add the 24-month time point for consistency with the pre-specified endpoints in the study protocol.

Interventions

A 90-day case management intervention to link hospitalized HIV-infected participants with local HIV clinics.

OTHERControl

Current routine HIV care in Tanzania.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * HIV-infected * ART (anti-retroviral therapy) naïve or have been on ART but have not used ART for \> 7 days * Lives in the region of Mwanza * Able to be referred to an HIV clinic inside the region of Mwanza * Has mobile phone or access to mobile phone * Planning to stay in the region of Mwanza for the next 24 months * Able to speak Kiswahili or English * Capable and willing to provide informed consent * Willing to provide locator information and two designated contact persons * Willing to have a home visits from a study team member

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant * On anti-retrovirals at hospital admission and already linked to an HIV clinic * Medical, psychiatric or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with completion of study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization12 monthsThe number of participants who die in the first 12 months post-hospitalization will be recorded. Death will be determined by phone calls to relatives and will be confirmed by verbal autopsies, obituaries, hospital records, or death certificates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ART Adherence3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 monthsART adherence will be assessed using the ACTG 4-Day ART Recall Questionnaire. Adherence will be calculated as a percentage, using 1 - (number of missed doses/number of prescribed doses).
Viral Suppression12 and 24 monthsSuppressed viral load will be defined as a binary outcome based upon the WHO definition of viral suppression as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level \<1000 copies/µl.
Traditional Health BeliefsBaseline,12, and 24 monthsTraditional health beliefs will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Insights and Beliefs Scale, scored from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more traditional health beliefs. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Self-EfficacyBaseline, 12, and 24 monthsSelf-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale, scored from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate a higher level of self-efficacy.
StigmaBaseline, 12, and 24 monthsStigma will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using questions based off the AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, scored from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stigma.
Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic3, 6, 9,12, and 24 monthsHIV clinic attendance will be monitored by review of HIV clinic records. HIV clinic attendance is defined as alive and attended clinic within a window of 90 days (+/- 45 days) around the time points.
Perceived Need for HIV ServicesBaseline, 12, and 24 monthsPerceived need for HIV services will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the ART Medications Attitude Scale, scored from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate a lower perceived need for HIV services.
SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthBaseline, 12, and 24 monthsPhysical weakness will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SF-12 Health Survey. The SF-12 measures physical health (physical component score (PCS)), scored from 0 to 100, and mental health (mental component score (MCS)), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical and mental health.
Acceptability12 and 24 monthsQualitative interviews will be conducted with a sub-set of participants to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. The acceptability of the Daraja intervention was defined as a binary outcome based on the results of the qualitative interviews. The sub-set will be comprised of 20 intervention participants, 20 routine care control participants, and 20 health care workers (nurses and physicians). Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm.
Incremental Cost of the Intervention12 monthsA microcosting analysis was conducted to identify the resources needed to implement and sustain the Daraja intervention and estimate the associated costs. Resource identification was accomplished primarily through in-person site visits and semi-structured interviews with relevant personnel. Nationally representative unit costs were assigned to the relevant resources. Resources were categorized as fixed start-up, time-dependent, or variable, and contextualized as being required for implementation or sustainment. The intervention implementation period was defined as the first 12 months following start-up, and consisted of the resources in all 3 of the aforementioned categories, and the sustainment period is intended to reflect a typical year following the implementation period, and consists of time-dependent and variable resources, given that the costs associated with fixed start-up resources become negligible over time. Incremental cost was reported as a number in 2023 USD.
Cost Per Life Saved12 monthsThe difference in costs between the arms from the healthcare perspective will be compared to the observed difference in survival between the arms to calculate incremental cost per life saved. Parametric methods based on parameters obtained from bootstrapping will be used to estimate an acceptability curves, which will illustrate the probability that the intervention is a good value for different willingness-to-pay thresholds
Social SupportBaseline, 12, and 24 monthsSocial support will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SPS-10 Scale, scored from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate a higher level of social support.

Countries

Tanzania

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Hospitalized people with HIV who were either not treated (antiretroviral-naïve) or had discontinued ART and were hospitalized for any reason were enrolled between March 2019 and February 2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Linkage Case Management Intervention
A 90-day case management intervention to link hospitalized HIV-infected participants with local HIV clinics.
250
Enhanced Standard of Care
Current routine HIV care in Tanzania.
250
Total500

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced Standard of CareTotalLinkage Case Management Intervention
Age, Continuous36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
HIV/ART status
Newly diagnosed HIV
191 Participants402 Participants211 Participants
HIV/ART status
Previously diagnosed HIV and discontinued ART (≥ 7 days)
59 Participants98 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
250 Participants500 Participants250 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
250 participants500 participants250 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
194 Participants384 Participants190 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants116 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
43 / 25042 / 250
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2500 / 250
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2500 / 250

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization

The number of participants who die in the first 12 months post-hospitalization will be recorded. Death will be determined by phone calls to relatives and will be confirmed by verbal autopsies, obituaries, hospital records, or death certificates.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization43 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization42 Participants
p-value: 0.9195% CI: [-0.06, 0.07]Chi-squared
Secondary

Acceptability

Qualitative interviews will be conducted with a sub-set of participants to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. The acceptability of the Daraja intervention was defined as a binary outcome based on the results of the qualitative interviews. The sub-set will be comprised of 20 intervention participants, 20 routine care control participants, and 20 health care workers (nurses and physicians). Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm.

Time frame: 12 and 24 months

Population: We assessed the acceptability of the Daraja intervention across the study groups through qualitative interviews. The subset of participants for qualitative interviews were purposively selected from the list of participants who had completed 12 months from enrollment. We selected 20 intervention participants, 20 control participants and 20 healthcare workers providing care to people with HIV. Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Linkage Case Management InterventionAcceptabilityAcceptability - 24 months20 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionAcceptabilityAcceptability -12 months20 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareAcceptabilityAcceptability -12 months20 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareAcceptabilityAcceptability - 24 months20 Participants
Health Care WorkersAcceptabilityAcceptability -12 months20 Participants
Health Care WorkersAcceptabilityAcceptability - 24 months20 Participants
Secondary

ART Adherence

ART adherence will be assessed using the ACTG 4-Day ART Recall Questionnaire. Adherence will be calculated as a percentage, using 1 - (number of missed doses/number of prescribed doses).

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionART Adherence6 months95.7 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 19.5
Linkage Case Management InterventionART Adherence12 months86.9 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 33.3
Linkage Case Management InterventionART Adherence9 months90.9 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 28.2
Linkage Case Management InterventionART Adherence24 months85.0 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 35.5
Linkage Case Management InterventionART Adherence3 months95.1 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 21.5
Enhanced Standard of CareART Adherence24 months72.1 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 44.7
Enhanced Standard of CareART Adherence3 months94.6 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 22
Enhanced Standard of CareART Adherence6 months91.6 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 27.1
Enhanced Standard of CareART Adherence9 months93.0 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 25
Enhanced Standard of CareART Adherence12 months77.8 percentage of ART adherenceStandard Deviation 41.5
Secondary

Cost Per Life Saved

The difference in costs between the arms from the healthcare perspective will be compared to the observed difference in survival between the arms to calculate incremental cost per life saved. Parametric methods based on parameters obtained from bootstrapping will be used to estimate an acceptability curves, which will illustrate the probability that the intervention is a good value for different willingness-to-pay thresholds

Time frame: 12 months

Population: This measure could not be calculated because it assumed an outcome that was not observed.

Secondary

Incremental Cost of the Intervention

A microcosting analysis was conducted to identify the resources needed to implement and sustain the Daraja intervention and estimate the associated costs. Resource identification was accomplished primarily through in-person site visits and semi-structured interviews with relevant personnel. Nationally representative unit costs were assigned to the relevant resources. Resources were categorized as fixed start-up, time-dependent, or variable, and contextualized as being required for implementation or sustainment. The intervention implementation period was defined as the first 12 months following start-up, and consisted of the resources in all 3 of the aforementioned categories, and the sustainment period is intended to reflect a typical year following the implementation period, and consists of time-dependent and variable resources, given that the costs associated with fixed start-up resources become negligible over time. Incremental cost was reported as a number in 2023 USD.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Linkage Case Management InterventionIncremental Cost of the InterventionYear 1 costs, per client22 US dollar
Linkage Case Management InterventionIncremental Cost of the InterventionAnnual sustainment costs, per client17 US dollar
Enhanced Standard of CareIncremental Cost of the InterventionYear 1 costs, per client0 US dollar
Enhanced Standard of CareIncremental Cost of the InterventionAnnual sustainment costs, per client0 US dollar
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic

HIV clinic attendance will be monitored by review of HIV clinic records. HIV clinic attendance is defined as alive and attended clinic within a window of 90 days (+/- 45 days) around the time points.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9,12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic6 months190 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic12 months180 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic9 months180 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic24 months161 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic3 months215 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic24 months143 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic3 months187 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic6 months160 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic9 months158 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic12 months158 Participants
Secondary

Perceived Need for HIV Services

Perceived need for HIV services will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the ART Medications Attitude Scale, scored from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate a lower perceived need for HIV services.

Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionPerceived Need for HIV ServicesBaseline1.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Linkage Case Management InterventionPerceived Need for HIV Services12 months1.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Linkage Case Management InterventionPerceived Need for HIV Services24 months1.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Enhanced Standard of CarePerceived Need for HIV ServicesBaseline1.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Enhanced Standard of CarePerceived Need for HIV Services12 months1.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Enhanced Standard of CarePerceived Need for HIV Services24 months1.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale, scored from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate a higher level of self-efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline22.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Linkage Case Management InterventionSelf-Efficacy12 months22.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.68
Linkage Case Management InterventionSelf-Efficacy24 months22.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.96
Enhanced Standard of CareSelf-EfficacyBaseline22.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Enhanced Standard of CareSelf-Efficacy12 months21.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Enhanced Standard of CareSelf-Efficacy24 months20.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
Secondary

SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health

Physical weakness will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SF-12 Health Survey. The SF-12 measures physical health (physical component score (PCS)), scored from 0 to 100, and mental health (mental component score (MCS)), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical and mental health.

Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPhysical component score (PCS )- Baseline37.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.13
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMental component score (MCS) - Baseline45.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.87
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPCS - 12 months50.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.31
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMCS - 12 months49.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPCS - 24 months50.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Linkage Case Management InterventionSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMCS - 24 months51.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.98
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPCS - 24 months50.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.59
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPhysical component score (PCS )- Baseline37.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.04
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMCS - 12 months50.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.85
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMental component score (MCS) - Baseline44.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.92
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthMCS - 24 months51.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.85
Enhanced Standard of CareSF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental HealthPCS - 12 months51.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.06
Secondary

Social Support

Social support will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SPS-10 Scale, scored from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate a higher level of social support.

Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionSocial SupportBaseline34.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.66
Linkage Case Management InterventionSocial Support12 months33.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Linkage Case Management InterventionSocial Support24 months33.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74
Enhanced Standard of CareSocial SupportBaseline34.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Enhanced Standard of CareSocial Support12 months32.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Enhanced Standard of CareSocial Support24 months31.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
Secondary

Stigma

Stigma will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using questions based off the AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, scored from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stigma.

Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionStigmaBaseline2.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Linkage Case Management InterventionStigma12 months2.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Linkage Case Management InterventionStigma24 months2.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Enhanced Standard of CareStigmaBaseline2.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Enhanced Standard of CareStigma12 months2.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Enhanced Standard of CareStigma24 months2.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Secondary

Traditional Health Beliefs

Traditional health beliefs will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Insights and Beliefs Scale, scored from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more traditional health beliefs. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.

Time frame: Baseline,12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linkage Case Management InterventionTraditional Health BeliefsBaseline0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Linkage Case Management InterventionTraditional Health Beliefs12 months0.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Linkage Case Management InterventionTraditional Health Beliefs24 months1.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Enhanced Standard of CareTraditional Health Beliefs12 months0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Enhanced Standard of CareTraditional Health Beliefs24 months1.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Enhanced Standard of CareTraditional Health BeliefsBaseline0.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Secondary

Viral Suppression

Suppressed viral load will be defined as a binary outcome based upon the WHO definition of viral suppression as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level \<1000 copies/µl.

Time frame: 12 and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Linkage Case Management InterventionViral Suppression12 months162 Participants
Linkage Case Management InterventionViral Suppression24 months153 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareViral Suppression12 months139 Participants
Enhanced Standard of CareViral Suppression24 months134 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026