HIV Infections
Conditions
Brief summary
This research is being done to assess the efficacy of a case management intervention to improve the one year mortality rate of hospitalized, HIV-infected, Tanzanian adults.
Detailed description
This research is being done to assess the efficacy of a case management intervention to improve the one year mortality rate of hospitalized, HIV-infected, Tanzanian adults. The study is being conducted at hospitals in Mwanza, Tanzania. 500 participants will be enrolled: 250 will be randomized to the case management intervention and 250 will randomized to routine clinical care. The case management intervention consists of 5 sessions over 90 days, and is designed to link hospitalized, HIV-infected patients to long term care at an HIV clinic. Participants will be followed for two years in order to evaluate primary and secondary study objectives. Secondary outcome measures time frames have been updated to add the 24-month time point for consistency with the pre-specified endpoints in the study protocol.
Interventions
A 90-day case management intervention to link hospitalized HIV-infected participants with local HIV clinics.
Current routine HIV care in Tanzania.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older * HIV-infected * ART (anti-retroviral therapy) naïve or have been on ART but have not used ART for \> 7 days * Lives in the region of Mwanza * Able to be referred to an HIV clinic inside the region of Mwanza * Has mobile phone or access to mobile phone * Planning to stay in the region of Mwanza for the next 24 months * Able to speak Kiswahili or English * Capable and willing to provide informed consent * Willing to provide locator information and two designated contact persons * Willing to have a home visits from a study team member
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant * On anti-retrovirals at hospital admission and already linked to an HIV clinic * Medical, psychiatric or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with completion of study procedures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization | 12 months | The number of participants who die in the first 12 months post-hospitalization will be recorded. Death will be determined by phone calls to relatives and will be confirmed by verbal autopsies, obituaries, hospital records, or death certificates. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ART Adherence | 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months | ART adherence will be assessed using the ACTG 4-Day ART Recall Questionnaire. Adherence will be calculated as a percentage, using 1 - (number of missed doses/number of prescribed doses). |
| Viral Suppression | 12 and 24 months | Suppressed viral load will be defined as a binary outcome based upon the WHO definition of viral suppression as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level \<1000 copies/µl. |
| Traditional Health Beliefs | Baseline,12, and 24 months | Traditional health beliefs will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Insights and Beliefs Scale, scored from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more traditional health beliefs. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6. |
| Self-Efficacy | Baseline, 12, and 24 months | Self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale, scored from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate a higher level of self-efficacy. |
| Stigma | Baseline, 12, and 24 months | Stigma will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using questions based off the AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, scored from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stigma. |
| Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 3, 6, 9,12, and 24 months | HIV clinic attendance will be monitored by review of HIV clinic records. HIV clinic attendance is defined as alive and attended clinic within a window of 90 days (+/- 45 days) around the time points. |
| Perceived Need for HIV Services | Baseline, 12, and 24 months | Perceived need for HIV services will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the ART Medications Attitude Scale, scored from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate a lower perceived need for HIV services. |
| SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | Baseline, 12, and 24 months | Physical weakness will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SF-12 Health Survey. The SF-12 measures physical health (physical component score (PCS)), scored from 0 to 100, and mental health (mental component score (MCS)), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical and mental health. |
| Acceptability | 12 and 24 months | Qualitative interviews will be conducted with a sub-set of participants to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. The acceptability of the Daraja intervention was defined as a binary outcome based on the results of the qualitative interviews. The sub-set will be comprised of 20 intervention participants, 20 routine care control participants, and 20 health care workers (nurses and physicians). Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm. |
| Incremental Cost of the Intervention | 12 months | A microcosting analysis was conducted to identify the resources needed to implement and sustain the Daraja intervention and estimate the associated costs. Resource identification was accomplished primarily through in-person site visits and semi-structured interviews with relevant personnel. Nationally representative unit costs were assigned to the relevant resources. Resources were categorized as fixed start-up, time-dependent, or variable, and contextualized as being required for implementation or sustainment. The intervention implementation period was defined as the first 12 months following start-up, and consisted of the resources in all 3 of the aforementioned categories, and the sustainment period is intended to reflect a typical year following the implementation period, and consists of time-dependent and variable resources, given that the costs associated with fixed start-up resources become negligible over time. Incremental cost was reported as a number in 2023 USD. |
| Cost Per Life Saved | 12 months | The difference in costs between the arms from the healthcare perspective will be compared to the observed difference in survival between the arms to calculate incremental cost per life saved. Parametric methods based on parameters obtained from bootstrapping will be used to estimate an acceptability curves, which will illustrate the probability that the intervention is a good value for different willingness-to-pay thresholds |
| Social Support | Baseline, 12, and 24 months | Social support will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SPS-10 Scale, scored from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate a higher level of social support. |
Countries
Tanzania
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Hospitalized people with HIV who were either not treated (antiretroviral-naïve) or had discontinued ART and were hospitalized for any reason were enrolled between March 2019 and February 2022.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention A 90-day case management intervention to link hospitalized HIV-infected participants with local HIV clinics. | 250 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care Current routine HIV care in Tanzania. | 250 |
| Total | 500 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enhanced Standard of Care | Total | Linkage Case Management Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 36 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 37 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 | 38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 |
| HIV/ART status Newly diagnosed HIV | 191 Participants | 402 Participants | 211 Participants |
| HIV/ART status Previously diagnosed HIV and discontinued ART (≥ 7 days) | 59 Participants | 98 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 250 Participants | 500 Participants | 250 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Tanzania | 250 participants | 500 participants | 250 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 194 Participants | 384 Participants | 190 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 56 Participants | 116 Participants | 60 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 43 / 250 | 42 / 250 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 250 | 0 / 250 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 250 | 0 / 250 |
Outcome results
Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization
The number of participants who die in the first 12 months post-hospitalization will be recorded. Death will be determined by phone calls to relatives and will be confirmed by verbal autopsies, obituaries, hospital records, or death certificates.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization | 43 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participant Deaths in the First 12 Months Post-hospitalization | 42 Participants |
Acceptability
Qualitative interviews will be conducted with a sub-set of participants to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. The acceptability of the Daraja intervention was defined as a binary outcome based on the results of the qualitative interviews. The sub-set will be comprised of 20 intervention participants, 20 routine care control participants, and 20 health care workers (nurses and physicians). Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
Population: We assessed the acceptability of the Daraja intervention across the study groups through qualitative interviews. The subset of participants for qualitative interviews were purposively selected from the list of participants who had completed 12 months from enrollment. We selected 20 intervention participants, 20 control participants and 20 healthcare workers providing care to people with HIV. Health care workers were not enrolled as participants in the trial nor randomized to a study arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Acceptability | Acceptability - 24 months | 20 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Acceptability | Acceptability -12 months | 20 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Acceptability | Acceptability -12 months | 20 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Acceptability | Acceptability - 24 months | 20 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Acceptability | Acceptability -12 months | 20 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Acceptability | Acceptability - 24 months | 20 Participants |
ART Adherence
ART adherence will be assessed using the ACTG 4-Day ART Recall Questionnaire. Adherence will be calculated as a percentage, using 1 - (number of missed doses/number of prescribed doses).
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | ART Adherence | 6 months | 95.7 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | ART Adherence | 12 months | 86.9 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 33.3 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | ART Adherence | 9 months | 90.9 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 28.2 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | ART Adherence | 24 months | 85.0 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 35.5 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | ART Adherence | 3 months | 95.1 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | ART Adherence | 24 months | 72.1 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 44.7 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | ART Adherence | 3 months | 94.6 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | ART Adherence | 6 months | 91.6 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 27.1 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | ART Adherence | 9 months | 93.0 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | ART Adherence | 12 months | 77.8 percentage of ART adherence | Standard Deviation 41.5 |
Cost Per Life Saved
The difference in costs between the arms from the healthcare perspective will be compared to the observed difference in survival between the arms to calculate incremental cost per life saved. Parametric methods based on parameters obtained from bootstrapping will be used to estimate an acceptability curves, which will illustrate the probability that the intervention is a good value for different willingness-to-pay thresholds
Time frame: 12 months
Population: This measure could not be calculated because it assumed an outcome that was not observed.
Incremental Cost of the Intervention
A microcosting analysis was conducted to identify the resources needed to implement and sustain the Daraja intervention and estimate the associated costs. Resource identification was accomplished primarily through in-person site visits and semi-structured interviews with relevant personnel. Nationally representative unit costs were assigned to the relevant resources. Resources were categorized as fixed start-up, time-dependent, or variable, and contextualized as being required for implementation or sustainment. The intervention implementation period was defined as the first 12 months following start-up, and consisted of the resources in all 3 of the aforementioned categories, and the sustainment period is intended to reflect a typical year following the implementation period, and consists of time-dependent and variable resources, given that the costs associated with fixed start-up resources become negligible over time. Incremental cost was reported as a number in 2023 USD.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Incremental Cost of the Intervention | Year 1 costs, per client | 22 US dollar |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Incremental Cost of the Intervention | Annual sustainment costs, per client | 17 US dollar |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Incremental Cost of the Intervention | Year 1 costs, per client | 0 US dollar |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Incremental Cost of the Intervention | Annual sustainment costs, per client | 0 US dollar |
Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic
HIV clinic attendance will be monitored by review of HIV clinic records. HIV clinic attendance is defined as alive and attended clinic within a window of 90 days (+/- 45 days) around the time points.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9,12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 6 months | 190 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 12 months | 180 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 9 months | 180 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 24 months | 161 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 3 months | 215 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 24 months | 143 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 3 months | 187 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 6 months | 160 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 9 months | 158 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Number of Participants Who Attended HIV Clinic | 12 months | 158 Participants |
Perceived Need for HIV Services
Perceived need for HIV services will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the ART Medications Attitude Scale, scored from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate a lower perceived need for HIV services.
Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Perceived Need for HIV Services | Baseline | 1.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Perceived Need for HIV Services | 12 months | 1.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Perceived Need for HIV Services | 24 months | 1.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Perceived Need for HIV Services | Baseline | 1.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Perceived Need for HIV Services | 12 months | 1.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Perceived Need for HIV Services | 24 months | 1.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale, scored from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate a higher level of self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Self-Efficacy | Baseline | 22.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Self-Efficacy | 12 months | 22.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.68 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Self-Efficacy | 24 months | 22.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.96 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Self-Efficacy | Baseline | 22.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Self-Efficacy | 12 months | 21.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.39 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Self-Efficacy | 24 months | 20.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.64 |
SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health
Physical weakness will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SF-12 Health Survey. The SF-12 measures physical health (physical component score (PCS)), scored from 0 to 100, and mental health (mental component score (MCS)), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical and mental health.
Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | Physical component score (PCS )- Baseline | 37.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.13 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | Mental component score (MCS) - Baseline | 45.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.87 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | PCS - 12 months | 50.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.31 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | MCS - 12 months | 49.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | PCS - 24 months | 50.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.23 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | MCS - 24 months | 51.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.98 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | PCS - 24 months | 50.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.59 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | Physical component score (PCS )- Baseline | 37.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.04 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | MCS - 12 months | 50.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.85 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | Mental component score (MCS) - Baseline | 44.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.92 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | MCS - 24 months | 51.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.85 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | SF-12 Health Survey: Physical and Mental Health | PCS - 12 months | 51.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.06 |
Social Support
Social support will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the SPS-10 Scale, scored from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate a higher level of social support.
Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Social Support | Baseline | 34.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.66 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Social Support | 12 months | 33.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.14 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Social Support | 24 months | 33.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.74 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Social Support | Baseline | 34.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.35 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Social Support | 12 months | 32.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Social Support | 24 months | 31.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.78 |
Stigma
Stigma will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using questions based off the AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, scored from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stigma.
Time frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Stigma | Baseline | 2.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Stigma | 12 months | 2.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Stigma | 24 months | 2.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Stigma | Baseline | 2.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Stigma | 12 months | 2.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Stigma | 24 months | 2.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
Traditional Health Beliefs
Traditional health beliefs will be assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the HIV Insights and Beliefs Scale, scored from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more traditional health beliefs. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Time frame: Baseline,12, and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Traditional Health Beliefs | Baseline | 0.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Traditional Health Beliefs | 12 months | 0.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Traditional Health Beliefs | 24 months | 1.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Traditional Health Beliefs | 12 months | 0.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Traditional Health Beliefs | 24 months | 1.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Traditional Health Beliefs | Baseline | 0.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
Viral Suppression
Suppressed viral load will be defined as a binary outcome based upon the WHO definition of viral suppression as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level \<1000 copies/µl.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Viral Suppression | 12 months | 162 Participants |
| Linkage Case Management Intervention | Viral Suppression | 24 months | 153 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Viral Suppression | 12 months | 139 Participants |
| Enhanced Standard of Care | Viral Suppression | 24 months | 134 Participants |