Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Intractable Pain

Spinal Cord Stimulation System in the Treatment of Chronic Pain

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03858790
Enrollment
54
Registered
2019-03-01
Start date
2019-02-28
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2019-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Nervous System Diseases, Pain, Spinal Cord Stimulation

Keywords

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using the PINS spinal cord stimulator device for chronic and intractable pain.

Detailed description

Adult patients with chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs who are candidates for a treatment with spinal cord stimulation will be prospectively randomized into 2 arms. Spinal cord stimulation parameters are programmed and adjusted during outpatient clinic visits, within the normal clinical practice.

Interventions

DEVICEPINS Spinal Cord Stimulator

Subjects will be implanted with PINS spinal cord stimulator

Sponsors

Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months. 2. VAS ≥ 5 3. Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment 4. Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits 5. Be willing and capable of giving informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or potential for with unwillingness to use contraception 2. Have a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis 3. Have evidence of psychiatric or cognitive disorder, who are unable to cooperate with surgery and program control 4. Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year 5. Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of diathermy 6. Other inappropriate situations determined by the researcher

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The difference of Visual-analogue scale (VAS) between the experimental group and the control group13 weeksPain will be evaluated in the different groups according to the Visual-analogue scale (VAS) varying from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in VAS4、12、24 weeksPain will be evaluated in the different groups according to the Visual-analogue scale (VAS) varying from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Sleep Quality4、12、24 weeksQuality of sleep will be assessed according to the number of nights with awakenings.
Changes in Beck Depression Inventory4、12、24 weeksThis will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory, a self-report measure of depression severity that is a well-characterized scale with excellent psychometric properties and is frequently used in research studies of depression. Higher values represent greater severity of depression.
Change in quality of life as measured by SF-364、12、24 weeksThe quality of life will be assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire.
Number of subjects with adverse events24 weeksThe number of adverse events will be record at each visit.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactFumin Jia, PhD
pins_medical@163.con010-60736388

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026