Skip to content

Use of a Pre-Surgical Toolkit in Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Participants With Cancer

Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients Through Implementation of an Efficient Pre-Surgical Toolkit (OPTI-Surg)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03857620
Enrollment
325
Registered
2019-02-28
Start date
2019-07-24
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Health Care Provider, Malignant Neoplasm, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Brief summary

This trial studies how well the use of a pre-surgical toolkit (OPTI-Surg) works in improving surgical care and outcomes in older participants with cancer. In many elderly patients, surgery can greatly affect physical condition and the ability to return to pre-surgery levels of physical functioning. Providing pre-surgical recommendations may help improve participants' recovery rate and functioning after surgery.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare 8-week postoperative function among elderly patients between sites randomized to implement the OPTI-Surg toolkit with or without a coach versus sites randomized to usual care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare postoperative morbidity between sites randomized to implement the OPTI-Surg toolkit with or without a coach versus sites randomized to usual care. II. To compare the penetration of the OPTI-Surg toolkit between sites randomized to implement the OPTI-Surg toolkit with a coach versus sites randomized to implement the OPTI-Surg toolkit without a coach. Trial Design: OUTLINE: Healthcare providers/institutions are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. Patients/participants receive the intervention based on which arm their healthcare provider is in. ARM I: Healthcare providers/institutions perform usual care. ARM II: Healthcare providers/institutions receive OPTI-Surg training and informational materials. ARM III: Healthcare providers/institutions receive OPTI-Surg training and informational materials and meet with a coach. After conclusion of study, participants are followed up at 8 and 12 weeks post surgery, and healthcare providers/institutions are followed up 6-9 months after the last patient is registered.

Interventions

OTHERBest Practice

Receive usual care

OTHERInformational Intervention

Receive OPTI-Surg program materials

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

OTHERInformational Intervention with Coaching

Receive OPTI-Surg program materials plus individual coaching

Sponsors

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have known or suspected cancer diagnosis and have one of the following cancer-directed operations planned: * Gastrectomy * Colectomy * Proctectomy * Esophagectomy * Pancreatectomy * Hepatectomy * Total cystectomy * Partial or total nephrectomy * Lung lobectomy/pneumonectomy * Patients with known metastatic disease with a plan for curative intent resection are eligible (e.g. curative liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer). * Patients with double primaries undergoing planned curative operation for both are eligible (e.g. synchronous colon cancers undergoing colectomy to treat both). * Patients must be able to speak and complete questionnaires in English.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing emergent surgery are not eligible. * Patients under active treatment such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiation treatment, etc. for second primary, are not eligible. * Patients with second primary are not eligible. * Patients with known metastatic disease who are undergoing palliative resection are not eligible. * Patients with psychiatric illness or other mental impairment that would preclude their ability to give informed consent or to participate in the prehabilitation program are not eligible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire8 weeks post surgeryThe CHAMPS questionnaire includes 41 questions that measures frequency and duration of activities. The primary endpoint is the estimated Caloric Expenditure Per Week measure from the CHAMPS, which is calculated by weighting the duration variable of the 28 exercise-related activities using the corresponding metabolic equivalents (METs) value, then multiplying by 60 to convert METs/minute to METs/hour, then multiplying by participant weight in kg/200 to calculate the caloric expenditure/week score, and then summing the individual item caloric expenditure scores across all 28 items. This scale score was transformed into the unit of kcal. The minimum possible value of the scale is 0 and there is not a defined maximum possible value. Higher scores equate to more kilocalories burned per week, which is a better outcome in the context of this trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-V)12 weeksPostoperative complications were assessed at 12 weeks following surgery using the Clavien-Dindo classification: Grade I: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course w/out the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions Grade II: Requiring pharmacological treatment w/ drug other than such allowed for Grade I complications Grade III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IIIa: Intervention not under general anesthesia Grade IIIb: Intervention under general anesthesia Grave IV: Life-threatening complication Grade IVa: Single organ dysfunction Grade IVb: Multiorgan dysfunction Grave V: Death A generalized linear mixed model (with logit link function) with random practice effect to account for clustering within practice will be used to compare postoperative complications within 12 weeks of surgery between the combined OPTI-Surg no-coach \& coach arms vs usual care followed by pairwise comparisons
Compliance Rate With Administration of Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)Day of surgical consultEFS is a validated measure of frailty that identifies distinct frailty domains that are potential targets for additional pre-operative optimization. For frailty domains that score 1 or 2 points, optimization referrals will be recommended. Clinic or research staff at sites randomized to OPTI-Surg intervention arms will screen and identify eligible patients for administration of the EFS and provide printed surgery preparation materials. A generalized linear mixed model (with logit link function) with a random practice effect to account for clustering within practice will be used to compare compliance rate for screening between the no-coach and coach arms.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRGeorge J. Chang, MD, MS

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three-hundred and twenty-five participants (94 Arm I, 114 Arm II, 117 Arm III) were enrolled between April 2019 to September 2022 from 29 sites (10 Arm I, 9 Arm II, 10 Arm III). Recruitment was temporarily paused from March 25, 2020 to June 15, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data as of 3/15/2024 that was summarized for manuscript submission, is reported here.

Pre-assignment details

This was a cluster-randomized trial at the practice level. Thirty sites with practice types of major abdominal (18 sites), thoracic (6 sites) or urologic (6 sites) were randomized initially in a 1:1:1 fashion to each arm. A total of 9 sites withdrew prior to accruing a patient due to inability to meet accrual expectations/had issues with resource allocation. Eight additional sites were randomized. A total of 29 sites remained with the study participation and accrued at least 1 patient.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Usual Care)
Healthcare providers/institutions perform usual care.
94
Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)
Healthcare providers/institutions receive OPTI-Surg training and informational materials.
114
Arm III (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials, Coach)
Healthcare providers/institutions receive OPTI-Surg training and informational materials and meet with a coach.
117
Total325

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Usual Care)Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)Arm III (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials, Coach)Total
Age, Continuous76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83
75.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.12
76.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.91
Baseline Weight77.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
81 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.68
82.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.38
80.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.06
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants0 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants13 Participants12 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants4 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
80 Participants97 Participants86 Participants263 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
94 participants114 participants117 participants325 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants50 Participants55 Participants148 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants64 Participants62 Participants177 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 945 / 1147 / 117
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 9416 / 11413 / 117
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 943 / 1143 / 117

Outcome results

Primary

Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire

The CHAMPS questionnaire includes 41 questions that measures frequency and duration of activities. The primary endpoint is the estimated Caloric Expenditure Per Week measure from the CHAMPS, which is calculated by weighting the duration variable of the 28 exercise-related activities using the corresponding metabolic equivalents (METs) value, then multiplying by 60 to convert METs/minute to METs/hour, then multiplying by participant weight in kg/200 to calculate the caloric expenditure/week score, and then summing the individual item caloric expenditure scores across all 28 items. This scale score was transformed into the unit of kcal. The minimum possible value of the scale is 0 and there is not a defined maximum possible value. Higher scores equate to more kilocalories burned per week, which is a better outcome in the context of this trial.

Time frame: 8 weeks post surgery

Population: All eligible participants who undergo major cancer surgery, consent to complete CHAMPS questionnaires, have a baseline CHAMPS score and have a CHAMPS score at 8 weeks post-surgery +/- 2 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Usual Care)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) QuestionnaireBaseline2.5 kcalStandard Deviation 2.53
Arm I (Usual Care)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire8 weeks post-surgery2.2 kcalStandard Deviation 1.94
Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) QuestionnaireBaseline2.3 kcalStandard Deviation 2.45
Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire8 weeks post-surgery2.2 kcalStandard Deviation 2.26
Arm III (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials, Coach)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) QuestionnaireBaseline3.0 kcalStandard Deviation 2.96
Arm III (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials, Coach)Physical Function 8 Weeks Post-surgery as Measured by the Caloric Expenditure Scale Per Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Questionnaire8 weeks post-surgery1.9 kcalStandard Deviation 1.76
Comparison: Combined Arm II (OPTI-Surg) \& Arm III (OPTI-Surg plus Coach) vs. Arm I (Usual Care)p-value: 0.5395% CI: [-0.85, 0.45]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.8495% CI: [-0.67, 0.81]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-1.21, 0.26]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-0.19, 1.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Compliance Rate With Administration of Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)

EFS is a validated measure of frailty that identifies distinct frailty domains that are potential targets for additional pre-operative optimization. For frailty domains that score 1 or 2 points, optimization referrals will be recommended. Clinic or research staff at sites randomized to OPTI-Surg intervention arms will screen and identify eligible patients for administration of the EFS and provide printed surgery preparation materials. A generalized linear mixed model (with logit link function) with a random practice effect to account for clustering within practice will be used to compare compliance rate for screening between the no-coach and coach arms.

Time frame: Day of surgical consult

Population: All eligible participants from Arm II (OPTI-Surg) and Arm III (OPTI-Surg plus Coach) who undergo major cancer surgery who are evaluable for postoperative complications outcome. Notes: Generalized linear mixed model analysis not performed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Usual Care)Compliance Rate With Administration of Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)99 percentage of participants
Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)Compliance Rate With Administration of Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-V)

Postoperative complications were assessed at 12 weeks following surgery using the Clavien-Dindo classification: Grade I: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course w/out the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions Grade II: Requiring pharmacological treatment w/ drug other than such allowed for Grade I complications Grade III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IIIa: Intervention not under general anesthesia Grade IIIb: Intervention under general anesthesia Grave IV: Life-threatening complication Grade IVa: Single organ dysfunction Grade IVb: Multiorgan dysfunction Grave V: Death A generalized linear mixed model (with logit link function) with random practice effect to account for clustering within practice will be used to compare postoperative complications within 12 weeks of surgery between the combined OPTI-Surg no-coach & coach arms vs usual care followed by pairwise comparisons

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All eligible participants who undergo major cancer surgery (no documentation of postoperative complications will be considered as not having any postoperative complications).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Usual Care)Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-V)25.6 percentage of participants
Arm II (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials)Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-V)44.8 percentage of participants
Arm III (OPTI-Surg Training and Materials, Coach)Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-V)26.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Combined Arm II (OPTI-Surg) \& Arm III (OPTI-Surg plus Coach) vs. Arm I (Usual Care)p-value: 0.595% CI: [0.23, 2.09]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.2195% CI: [0.13, 1.62]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.9695% CI: [0.3, 3.54]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [0.13, 1.54]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026