Skip to content

COMPARISON OF PIEZOSURGERY AND CONVENTIONAL ROTARY INSTRUMENTS IN IMPACTED THIRD MOLAR SURGERY

A PROSPECTIVE SPLIT MOUTH CLINICAL STUDY: OF PIEZOSURGERY AND CONVENTIONAL ROTARY INSTRUMENTS IN IMPACTED THIRD MOLAR SURGERY

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03857035
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-02-27
Start date
2019-02-04
Completion date
2019-05-07
Last updated
2019-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Keywords

Trismus, piezosurgery, pain, swelling

Brief summary

The purpose is to compare the effects of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus and patients' comfort after mandibular third molar surgery.

Detailed description

The investigators plan a prospective and split mouth study. Thirty patients will be randomly selected. Inclusion criteria were being older than 18 of age, having asymptomatic bilateral mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar (Pell and Gregory class II, position B) fully covered with mucosa and bone, and being otherwise medically healthy. One side of the patients will be randomly selected and labeled as experimental group. In experimental group, impacted third molar will be extracted using piezosurgery. The other side will be accepted as control group. In the control group, impacted third molar will be extracted using conventional rotary instruments.There will at least one month between two surgeries. The investigators will compare postoperative pain, swelling, trismus and patients' comfort.

Interventions

OTHERPiezosurgery group

Piezosurgery technique will be examined about impacted third molar surgery.

Sponsors

Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria were being older than 18 of age, having asymptomatic bilateral mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar (Pell and Gregory class II, position B) fully covered with mucosa and bone, and being otherwise medically healthy.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All the patients will be given a form containing verbal rating scale ranging from 0 to 5, showing the degree of swelling.Up to 1 weekThe edema measurement will be done during the one week after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain will be assessed using a visual analogue scale.Up to 1 weekThe level of postoperative pain will be evaluated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale , with zero representing no pain and 10 representing excruciating pain. Pain measurement will be done preoperatively, postoperative 2nd day, 7th day after the surgery.
Trismus will be evaluated using a caliper at maximum mouth opening.Up to 1 weekTrismus will be assessed by measuring the maximum interincisal opening (in millimetres) - the distance between the incisal margin of the upper and lower central incisors. Trismus measurement will be done preoperatively, postoperative 2nd day, 7th day after the surgery.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026