Knee Surgery, Point Light Display, Rehabilitation
Conditions
Brief summary
The LOARAL project concerns patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty to treat symptomatic osteoarthritis. Patient will be divided into two groups: a control group where patients will do standard rehabilitation and an experimental group where patients will do standard rehabilitation associated with the judgement of point-light display. The aim of this study is to validate the use of point-light display for the Rehabilitation of patients with a totalarthroplasty of the knee.
Interventions
Experimental group who will do usual rehabilitation and visualization of point-light human actions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Volunteers over 18 years of age who have undergone knee surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Any locomotor condition not due to knee surgery * Uncorrected visual disturbances * Comorbidity altering locomotion (history of stroke, neurological condition, inflammatory rheumatism)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the evaluation of the point light display relative to conventional rehabilitation | Rehabilitation during 3 weeks | The time to realize the time up and go test will be assessed at inclusion and at the end of the program. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the evaluation of the point light display on functional recovery | At the end of the program (3 weeks max) | Test score the time up and go and test score questionnary WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Bellamy et al., 1988). |
| Compare the evaluation of the point light display on the detection and action recognition | At the end of the program (3 weeks max) | Percentages of correct recognition of actions on the point light display |
| Compare the evaluation of the point light display on the feeling of self-efficacy personal | At the end of the program (3 weeks max) | Test score questionnary of self-efficacy personal (Dumont et al., 2000). |
Countries
France