Skip to content

Serrated Lesions Detection With Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy

Serrated Lesions Detection With Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03856957
Enrollment
257
Registered
2019-02-27
Start date
2018-06-11
Completion date
2019-07-01
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, Serrated Lesion

Keywords

Serrated Lesion, Endocuff, Detection

Brief summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in Western countries. CRC is currently considered a preventable disease and screening has been endorsed by several societies, since it has been shown that screening and surveillance are effective in reducing both CRC incidence and mortality. However, recently, concern has risen regarding colonoscopy effectiveness, especially in the right colon. The most accepted explanation for this effectiveness variability is attributed to sessile serrated lesions (SSL), which are more frequent in the proximal colon, more difficult to detect because of their flat morphology and associated with interval CRC, which is the occurrence of CRC after screening colonoscopy and before the next scheduled procedure. Several techniques are emerging to increase the sensitivity of colonoscopy for pre-cancerous lesions, especially adenomas. Recently an endoscopic cap, the Endocuff, was developed to improve adenoma detection. Several studies demonstrated improved adenoma detection with Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy when compared with conventional colonoscopy. Still, the available data for its' role in detecting SSL is very limited. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in detection of colorectal SSL.

Interventions

DEVICEEndocuff colonoscopy

Colonoscopy performed with Endocuff for mucosal inspection and interventions (eg. polypectomy).

DEVICEcontrol

colonoscopy without endocuff

Sponsors

Hospital Beatriz Ângelo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopies

Exclusion criteria

* Known polyposis syndromes * Personal colorectal cancer history * Previous colorectal surgery * Severe diverticulosis * Colonic stricture * Inflammatory bowel disease * Primary sclerosing cholangitis * Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average number of serrated lesions ≥ 10 mm detected per colonoscopyimmediateAverage number of serrated lesions ≥ 10 mm detected per colonoscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average number of serrated lesions < 10 mm detected per colonoscopyimmediateAverage number of serrated lesions \< 10 mm detected per colonoscopy
Average number of adenomas detected per colonoscopyimmediateAverage number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy
Adenoma detection rateimmediateNumber of patients with at least one adenoma/total number of participants
Adenocarcinoma detection rateimmediateNumber of patients with at least one adenocarcinoma/total number of participants
Serrated lesions detection rateimmediateNumber of patients with at least one serrated lesion/total number of participants
Cecal incubation timeimmediatetime from the rectum to cecum in minutes
Withdrawal timeimmediatetime from the cecum to the rectum in minutes
Incidence of procedure related adverse eventsimmediateNumber of adverse events
Cecal intubation rateimmediateProportion of colonoscopies with cecal intubation x100

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026