Skip to content

Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03855787
Enrollment
103
Registered
2019-02-27
Start date
2019-11-11
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Calculi

Brief summary

The rationale for this study is to determine if there is a difference in complications among patients undergoing ureteroscopy for renal stones who receive a stent compared to not receiving a stent postoperatively.

Detailed description

Kidney stones affect 9% individuals within the United States, and the prevalence is increasing. Over the last few decades, ureteroscopy has become the most commonly performed stone procedure. However the complication rate after ureteroscopy is not insignificant. Reducing morbidity after ureteroscopy would improve patient outcomes and reduce health care utilization. A major contributor to patient morbidity after ureteroscopy is the ureteral stent, which is placed at the time of surgery and left in place 1-2 weeks after surgery. The rationale for utilizing stents is to prevent urinary obstruction from edema or stone fragments. On the other hand, stents cause hematuria, pain, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Additionally, stent-related symptoms are often misdiagnosed as urinary tract infections leading to unnecessary antibiotic use. The clinical utility of ureteral stents after ureteroscopy has not been well studied, specifically a stone located in the kidney. Prior studies on stent-less ureteroscopic procedures have focused on treatment of ureteral stones and not stones located in the kidney, have had restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria, are primarily from single center institutions, and most being performed \ 15 years ago. Surgical techniques and device innovations have changed the procedure since that time. To date, there have been only 2 studies that included stone located in the kidney showing no difference in unplanned hospital revisits, however both combined analyses with ureteral stones and selection bias was an issue for both studies. In addition, there is a lack of studies assessing opiate use, impact of quality of life with stent placement, and loss of work related to stent placement

Interventions

PROCEDUREUreteroscopy

Ureteroscopy for 1.5cm or less renal stones.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Université de Montréal
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Penn State Health
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* nonobstructing renal stone 1.5cm total stone diameter (if multiple stones, then sum of maximum diameters) or less undergoing ureteroscopy

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 years * pregnancy status * ureteral stone * preoperative hydronephrosis * indwelling nephrostomy tube * planning bilateral ureteroscopy or subsequent staged ureteroscopy * solitary kidney or eGFR \<60 mL/min (CKD stage 3 or greater) * variant anatomy including horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, prior urinary tract reconstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total number of complications30 days after ureteroscopyTotal number of complications - Defined as ER visits related to procedure, unanticipated provider visit, and hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) form 6abaseline to 5-10 days after ureteroscopyThis survey assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life, including engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. There are 6 questions on the survey. The survey score uses at T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in a referent population. A higher score denotes greater pain interference in one's life.
WISQOL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire)baseline to 5-10 days after ureteroscopyThis is a disease specific quality-of-life instrument designed to assess the impact on patients of stones in the urinary tract. The survey is a 28-item instrument with a 5-point LIkert scale for each item. There are a total of 140 points total, and a difference of 10 points can be considered clinically significant.
Cumulative opiate morphine equivalent dosing (MED)baseline to 5-10 days after ureteroscopyThis will be the calculated morphine equivalent dosage of all opiate medications that are prescribed after surgery to follow-up at 5-10 days.
% return to work5-10 days after ureteroscopyThis is the number of participants that have returned to work at the time of follow-up at 5-10 days divided by the total participants in the group.
Number of participants with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI)Baseline 5-10 days after ureteroscopyThis will be defined as a urine culture positivity (50,000 cfu/mL or more) with urinary symptoms.
Number of participants with abnormal imaging findings4-8 weeks after ureteroscopyHydronephrosis, hematoma, urinoma on routine postop imaging

Countries

Canada, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRyan Hsi, MD

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026