Skip to content

The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial 2

A Randomised Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03854500
Acronym
NOR-TEST 2
Enrollment
201
Registered
2019-02-26
Start date
2019-10-28
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Disorders, Ischemic Stroke, Stroke, Acute

Keywords

Tenecteplase, Thrombolysis, Alteplase

Brief summary

Background: Alteplase is the only approved acute drug treatment in ischemic stroke and aims at dissolving arterial clots causing cerebral ischemia. The overall benefit of alteplase is substantial. However, there is considerable room for improvement as 2/3 of patients with large clots may not achieve reopening of the vessel and up to 40% of the patients remain severely disabled or die. Tenecteplase, a modified tissue plasminogen activator, has been shown to be a more efficient and safer thrombolytic drug than alteplase in pre-clinical studies. Tenecteplase has replaced alteplase as thrombolytic treatment in myocardial infarction and may also be the drug of choice in ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase and alteplase had a similar safety profile in the NOR-TEST trial and there were no differences in efficacy between the two treatment groups. However, a majority of patients had mild stroke which may be associated with a natural favorable prognosis. In spite of these neutral results, tenecteplase has the potential to replace alteplase as the drug of choice, based on a better pharmacological profile and a simpler practical administration. There is, however, need for a higher number of patients to prove the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase. Hypothesis: Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg is non-inferior compared with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg.

Detailed description

Objectives: To compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg (single bolus) vs. alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes) a) within 4½ hours after symptom onset; b) within 4½ hours after awakening with stroke symptoms, and c) as bridging therapy within 4½ hours before thrombectomy. Study design: NOR-TEST-2 is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial, designed to establish non-inferiority of tenecteplase as compared with alteplase for consecutively admitted patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated within 4½ hours after symptom onset. Randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase is 1:1. Endpoints: Primary endpoint is functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days (efficacy). Secondary endpoints include rates of cerebral hemorrhages on CT/MR at 24-48 hours and mortality (safety). Patient recruitment: All patients admitted to hospital with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for standard iv thrombolysis with alteplase and with pre-stroke mRS\<3 and NIHSS score of \>5 on admission are potentially eligible for NOR-TEST-2. Based on power calculations from NOR-TEST, NOR-TEST 2 aims at including 1036 patients.

Interventions

DRUGTenecteplase

0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously

DRUGAlteplase

0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously

Sponsors

Haukeland University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled multicenter study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General inclusion criteria * 18 years or older * Ischaemic stroke with clinical symptoms corresponding to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) of \>5. All stroke sub-types and vascular distributions are eligible. A visible arterial occlusion is not required for inclusion. * Treatment \<4½ hours after stroke onset or after awakening with symptoms. * Informed consent by patient or by patient's family Specific sub-set inclusion criteria * Wake-Up Stroke: FLAIR-DWI mismatch on MRI as judged by the (neuro-) radiologist or neurologist. * Thrombectomy: Occlusion of intracerebral artery technically accessible for endovascular embolectomy as defined by local treatment protocols.

Exclusion criteria

* Prestroke modified rankin scale of ≥3 * Large areas of hypodense ischaemic changes on baseline CT; * Patients with systolic blood pressure \>185 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mm Hg in spite of acute antihypertensive treatment; * Pregnant women (are treated with alteplase); * Women with possible pregnancy (are treated with alteplase) * Beast feeding women, if a 24 hours stop of feeding is not feasible. * Clinical presentation suggesting subarachnoid haemorrhage even if baseline CT is normal; * Known bleeding diathesis; use of oral anticoagulants with no antidot, INR ≥1,4; heparin \<48 hours and increased APTT; low molecular weight heparin(oid) \<24 hours; another investigational drug \<14 days; * Patients with arterial puncture at a noncompressible site or lumbar puncture \<7 days; major surgery or serious trauma \<14 days; gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage \<14 days; clinical stroke \<2 months; history of intracranial haemorrhage; CNS neurosurgery \<2 months; serious head trauma \<2 months; pericarditis; sepsis; any serious medical illness likely to interact with treatment; confounding pre-existent neurological or psychiatric disease; unlikely to complete follow-up; * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, puts a patient at risk if treated with thrombolysis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with favorable functional outcome90 daysModified Rankin Scale 0-1 (favorable= 0-1, unfavorable 2-6)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage24-48 hoursProportion of patients with haemorrhagic infarct/haematoma as defined by CT or MRI
Any cerebral haemorrhage24-48 hoursProportion of patients haemorrhagic infarct/haematoma as defined by CT or MRI
Major neurological improvement24 hoursProportion of patients \>3 Points improvement by NIHSS score or NIHSS score 0 (NIHSS score range is 0-42)
Functional handicap90 daysOrdinal shift analysis of modified Rankin scale (0-6)
Mortality90 daysProportion of patients who died

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026