Skip to content

Sleep Quality Response to Resisted Training After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Sleep Quality Response to Resisted Training After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03853668
Acronym
exercises
Enrollment
80
Registered
2019-02-26
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2018-07-01
Last updated
2019-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Deprivation

Keywords

sleep quality, aerobic and resisted exercises, CABG

Brief summary

Background:There are still many gaps in research concerning the effect of different physical training modalities on sleep quality in the population underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgeries(CABG).Purpose:The present study was conducted to compare the quality of sleep in subjects who underwent CABG, were submitted to two types of training (i.e, aerobic exercise alone or combined aerobic and resistance training

Detailed description

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: There are still many gaps in research concerning the effect of different physical training modalities on sleep quality in the cardiac population. Thus, the objective of the present study was to compare the quality of sleep in subjects who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery submitted to two types of training (ie, aerobic exercise alone or combined aerobic and resistance training). PATIENTS/METHODS: 80 Participants aged 45-65 years were randomized to two groups: aerobic group (AG), combined aerobic and resistance group (ARG). Training lasted ten consecutive weeks with 30 uninterrupted sessions. The actigraph (Actiwatch Minimitter Company, Incorporated (INC) - Sunriver, OR, USA) was placed on the non-dominant wrist and activities were monitored continuously while being recorded at one minute intervals. The participants kept the device for a period of 96 hours before the first and last training sessions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALexercise

control group (n=40) did aerobic exercises on treadmill for 10 weeks experimental group (n=40) did combined aerobic and resisted exercises for 10 weeks

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients who have underwent CABG surgery since 6-8 weeks 2. Their ages ranges from 40 and 80 years of age 3. Medically stable patients. 4. patients did CABG-only treatment (not combined with valve replacement surgery) 5. Current complaint of poor Sleep quality (SQ) (score \> 5 of the SQ scale) 6. Body mass index ≤ 35 kg/m2 (no obstructive sleep apnea)

Exclusion criteria

1. Any patient is known to have any unstable medical condition 2. History of chronic insomnia for at least one year before surgery 3. Indication of receiving treatments for depression and anxiety 4. Musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that might interfere with the execution or the assessment of the exercise.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sleep quality to be assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)up to 12 months1.The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval.
sleep fragmentation index to be assessed by actigraphyup to 12 months2.Actigraphy is a valid tool to assist in determining sleep patterns in normal, healthy adult populations, normal infants and children, and patients suspected of certain sleep disorders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional aerobic capacity to be assessed by 6 minute walk test (6MWT)6 monthsThe 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026