Skip to content

Developing a Pain Identification and Communication Toolkit

Developing a Pain Identification and Communication Toolkit for Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03853291
Acronym
PICT
Enrollment
85
Registered
2019-02-25
Start date
2019-03-08
Completion date
2021-08-11
Last updated
2022-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Dementia

Brief summary

The proposed research will develop, refine, and pilot test the Pain Identification and Communication Toolkit (PICT), an intervention to help family caregivers of community-dwelling persons with dementia identify pain symptoms and communicate those symptoms to health care providers. Informed by self-efficacy theory, PICT will include: a) training in administering an observational assessment tool to identify pain in persons with dementia, b) coaching in effective communication about the person with dementia's pain symptoms, c) future planning for steps to take when pain is detected, and d) updating caregivers' skills through routine practice with the pain assessment tool. All components will be vetted and iteratively field-tested with a sample of racially and ethnically diverse caregivers of community-dwelling persons with dementia and health care providers. A two-group pilot randomized trial will examine the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary impact of PICT on caregivers' initiation of pain-related communication with health care providers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPICT Workbook

PICT Workbook: The PICT workbook is a 31-page manual, which includes: a) training using an observational assessment tool to detect pain in PWD, b) coaching and feedback by a research nurse in effective strategies for communicating with providers about PWD's pain, c) future planning for what steps to take when a pain symptom is detected, and d) updating the caregiver's skill set. Participants in the intervention condition also attended four weekly 30-minute sessions with an interventionist through a combination of online (video observation) and telephone coaching to go over the Workbook.

Pamphlet with information about pain and dementia and links to Alzheimer's Association

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
Rutgers University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For all phases: Inclusion Criteria: * Family caregiver * Age 21 or older * English speaking * Cognitively intact * Provides at least 8 hours of care per week to a person with dementia and pain * Has provided care for at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Paid caregiver * Age 20 or younger * Non-English speaking * Cognitively impaired * Does not provide at least 8 hours of care per week to a person with dementia who also has a pain diagnosis * Has not provided care for at least 6 months * Currently enrolled in hospice * The patient to whom the caregiver provides assistance is in enrolled in hospice * Care recipient does not have dementia diagnosis or pain diagnosis For field test and interview phases: Healthcare professionals: * Currently providing clinical services to persons with dementia and/or chronic pain * Has provided these clinical services for at least 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants in the Intervention Condition Who Completed All SessionsPost-intervention, 3 months
Feasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants RecruitedBaseline
Acceptability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Report That the Intervention Was Very Effective or Moderately Effective in Helping Them Feel More Confident in Their Ability to Communicate Pain to Healthcare ProvidersPost-intervention, 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Caregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related ConcernsBaseline, Post-intervention-3 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PICT Workbook
PICT Workbook: The PICT workbook is a 31 page manual, which includes: a) training using an observational assessment tool to detect pain in PWD, b) coaching and feedback by a research nurse in effective strategies for communicating with providers about PWD's pain, c) future planning for what steps to take when a pain symptom is detected, and d) updating the caregiver's skill set. Participants in the intervention condition also attended four weekly 30-minute sessions with an interventionist through a combination of online (video observation) and telephone coaching to go over the Workbook.
18
Information Pamphlet
Informational pamphlet about pain in dementia and a link to the Alzheimer's Association website. Information Pamphlet: Pamphlet with information about pain and dementia and links to Alzheimer's Association
16
Family Caregivers - Interview Phase
Interviews will be conducted with family caregivers and health care providers in-person in private offices at WCMC/NYP or over the telephone. The primary objectives of the qualitative interviews are to: a) adapt the PAINAD for use with caregivers by asking them to comment on its format and content; and b) generate an initial question pool for the Question Prompt List. After reviewing the PICT workbook, caregivers will complete a brief qualitative questionnaire about the content, format, and perceived utility of PICT, as well as ways to enhance its cultural relevance. They will also complete a semi-structured interview to clarify their perspectives. Health care providers will answer a similar set of questions. Results from this first field-test will inform the next version of PICT and address key issues, such as the feasibility of using research nurses to administer the intervention, anticipation of participant burden for caregivers, and adequacy of PICT format and instructions.
18
Healthcare Providers - Interview Phase
Interviews will be conducted with family caregivers and health care providers in-person in private offices at WCMC/NYP or over the telephone. The primary objectives of the qualitative interviews are to: a) adapt the PAINAD for use with caregivers by asking them to comment on its format and content; and b) generate an initial question pool for the Question Prompt List. After reviewing the PICT workbook, caregivers will complete a brief qualitative questionnaire about the content, format, and perceived utility of PICT, as well as ways to enhance its cultural relevance. They will also complete a semi-structured interview to clarify their perspectives. Health care providers will answer a similar set of questions. Results from this first field-test will inform the next version of PICT and address key issues, such as the feasibility of using research nurses to administer the intervention, anticipation of participant burden for caregivers, and adequacy of PICT format and instructions.
16
Family Caregivers - Field Test Phase
Once initial versions of the PICT manual and workbook are developed, they will be iteratively field-tested and vetted by family caregivers and health care providers. After reviewing the PICT workbook, caregivers will complete a brief qualitative questionnaire about the content, format, and perceived utility of PICT, as well as ways to enhance its cultural relevance. They will also complete a brief (15-20 minute) semi-structured interview to clarify their perspectives. Health care providers will answer a similar set of questions. Results from this first field-test will inform the modified version of PICT and will address key issues, such as the feasibility of using research nurses (and other practice staff) to administer the intervention, anticipation of participant burden for caregivers, and adequacy of PICT format and instructions.
6
Healthcare Providers - Field Test Phase
Once initial versions of the PICT manual and workbook are developed, they will be iteratively field-tested and vetted by family caregivers and health care providers. After reviewing the PICT workbook, caregivers will complete a brief qualitative questionnaire about the content, format, and perceived utility of PICT, as well as ways to enhance its cultural relevance. They will also complete a brief (15-20 minute) semi-structured interview to clarify their perspectives. Health care providers will answer a similar set of questions. Results from this first field-test will inform the modified version of PICT and will address key issues, such as the feasibility of using research nurses (and other practice staff) to administer the intervention, anticipation of participant burden for caregivers, and adequacy of PICT format and instructions.
11
Total85

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyDetermined to be ineligible110000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up120000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFamily Caregivers - Interview PhaseFamily Caregivers - Field Test PhaseTotalPICT WorkbookInformation PamphletHealthcare Providers - Field Test PhaseHealthcare Providers - Interview Phase
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.63
61.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.35
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants10 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants5 Participants73 Participants15 Participants14 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants11 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants0 Participants8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants6 Participants59 Participants12 Participants11 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants6 participants85 participants18 participants16 participants11 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants6 Participants72 Participants15 Participants16 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants0 Participants13 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 160 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 160 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 160 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Report That the Intervention Was Very Effective or Moderately Effective in Helping Them Feel More Confident in Their Ability to Communicate Pain to Healthcare Providers

Time frame: Post-intervention, 3 months

Population: For the intervention condition: 2 participants did not complete the intervention, n=1 lost to follow-up, n=1 determined ineligible post-enrollment. Data from the information pamphlet arm was not collected. Data were not collected from participants in the interview and field test arms/phases.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PICT WorkbookAcceptability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Report That the Intervention Was Very Effective or Moderately Effective in Helping Them Feel More Confident in Their Ability to Communicate Pain to Healthcare Providers13 Participants
Primary

Feasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants in the Intervention Condition Who Completed All Sessions

Time frame: Post-intervention, 3 months

Population: 2 participants did not complete the intervention, n=1 lost to follow-up, n=1 determined ineligible post-enrollment. Data were not collected from participants in the interview and field test arms/phases.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PICT WorkbookFeasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants in the Intervention Condition Who Completed All Sessions16 Participants
Primary

Feasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants Recruited

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected from participants in the interview and field test arms/phases.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PICT WorkbookFeasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants Recruited18 Participants
Information PamphletFeasibility, as Measured by the Number of Participants Recruited16 Participants
Secondary

Caregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related Concerns

Time frame: Baseline, Post-intervention-3 months

Population: 5 participants overall were not analyzed. For the workbook: n=1 lost to follow-up, n=1 deemed ineligible. For informational pamphlet: n=2 lost to follow-up, n=1 deemed ineligible. Data were not collected from participants in the interview and field test arms/phases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PICT WorkbookCaregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related ConcernsBaseline13 Participants
PICT WorkbookCaregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related Concerns3 Month Assessment12 Participants
Information PamphletCaregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related ConcernsBaseline8 Participants
Information PamphletCaregiver Initiated Pain-related Communication, as Measured by the Number of Caregivers Who Report Making Contact With Any of the Care Recipients' Health Care Providers to Discuss Pain-related Concerns3 Month Assessment8 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026